I was sent an article by e-mail this morning, you know, one of those that casts a shadow over your day and has you yearning for something to hit.
For years here in Stoke-on-Trent, lots of us have been fighting against the Renew and Regeneration programmes set up by the city council, not to regenerate the area, but to provide high paying jobs to their incompetent and criminal friends.
Millions have been wasted, half the bloody city has been demolished, and yet the re-vitalisation of this city still hasn't taken place because of the arrogant and corrupt systems that rule over contracts and the hiring and firing of personnel.
The Civic Centre at Stoke is now in the midst of its 3rd investigation by the Fraud Squad, guided to this position by the totally corrupted Labour party, and yet they are still allowed to cheat their way to electoral success because the network they have set up locally, regionally, and nationally, allows them to do so!
The article I was sent refers to the parachuted in Oxfordshire ponce, Tristram Hunt, who is furious over the coalition governments closure of the Labour partys regeneration slushfunds, like Advantage West Midlands,
NSRP, Renew, and these other development quangos that afford so many marxists a champagne lifestyle.
What he doesn't point out, is that it was his crooked, cheating party that landed us in all this trouble in the first place!
And the decision met with a furious response from Stoke-on-Trent Central MP Tristram Hunt, who said last night: "This is a betrayal of the people of Stoke-on-Trent and the people who have been living with years of demolition."
Yes, we have been living for years with spreading demolition and bugger all else, because that's what your Labour cronies have dumped on us!
60 years of Labour rule, and the city is on its last legs, just how stupid are the people that keep voting in a regime that is killing off the city?!
The first thing we need to do in the fight to win back this city is to get as many of our people as possible elected to the city council. There are only going to be 44 councillors after the boundary changes, which means we only need 23 for a majority that will allow us by-pass all this communist BS, and drag this city back to where it should be, a working class city with good jobs, good prospects for our youngsters, and a housing and benefit system that support the native people of this city, not those that have been here 5 minutes and who know nothing of our culture and customs.
In 4 years time, we have to be looking to oust the 3 Labour MPs who have been suplanted into the political system of this city. There was a Labour government for 13 years and these bloody Labourites achieved nothing but destruction and despair, so what do you expect from them now that their government has been rejected?
What we need is proper people in Westminster representing this city, people not afraid to stand up and tell it like it is, people who are not afraid to roll up their sleeves and get their hands dirty, in the fight to save this city from Labours marxism, and the PC liberalism of the rest of these thieves and liars.
contact us at; efpstoke@gmail.com
Friday, 29 October 2010
Wednesday, 27 October 2010
Muslim-on-Trent.
In 2004, the North Staffs Race Equality Council had income of £1,010,000.
In 2005, this same organisation had income of £1,100,000.
For the next 3 years, the NSREC never published any accounts, despite this breaking the Charity Commission regulations.
In January 2009, the NSREC folded, declared itself bankrupt, and closed its doors, and all of this was done with no investigation into the closure at all.
Judging by the success of the NSREC in 04/05, it seems reasonable to expect it to have done similarly well in
06/07/08, so monies that are to this day unaccounted for would be at least £3 million.
The NSREC was run by muslims, and was used as a way of channelling public money into the bme community, with 14 of the 16 executive positions being held by muslims, but it is the breach of another law that really catches the eye.
Charities have to by law, be none political, yet reading through the officers and committee members of the NSREC, is like a roll call of local councillors.
Of the top 4 honourary positions, 3 were muslim, with Bagh Ali and Karamat Ali both serving councillors, and Sajida Ahmed an ex-councillor. Other councillors involved were, Mohammed Pervez( membership panel), Elaine Blake( exec committee), Randolph Conteh( exec committee), Anita Gill( exec committee), Mohammed Matloob( exec committee).
By law, charities are to be none political, so if this is none political, where are the Tory councillors, the BNP councillors? This entire organisation was nothing more than a muslim lovefest from start to finish, and the so called upstanding citizens involved in this mess have turned out to be nothing more than liars and cheats, and now Stoke-on-Trent city council are producing the ingredients for it to happen again.
In 2008, Stoke-on-Trent city council agreed to planning permission for a £1.5 million mosque in Normacot, to appease the ever growing muslim population that has colonised the south of our city.
By the time the Regent Street mosque in Hanley is finished, it will have cost almost £2 million, the muslims now want to build a £1.5 million mosque in Normacot. The question I have is this; if they can raise £3.5/£4 million for two buildings, what the hell are Stoke-on-Trent taxpayers been made to give them money for?
We have immigrant councillors that do not concern themselves with the white people of their wards, and if you want proof of this, just ask the white people of Tunstall what the muslim councillors do for them.
We have a list of outsiders that are running the city council, when what this city needs is people from inside it running the council, people who have genuine affection for the city and its people, and we need this soon or the city will become nothing more than a dumping ground for all the third world dross.
It's about time that the Stoke EDL division started to make its presence felt as well. Asda, Tesco, Waitrose,
Somerfield, all selling halal meat, our schools all serving halal meat, yet not a peep from the EDL!
One giant eyesore of a mosque in Hanley, another planned for Normacot, yet not a peep from Stoke EDL!
All of us native people need to come together to rescue our city from the grasping hands of immigrants and political chancers, and that will include getting everyone registered to vote, so come election time, we can oust these interlopers and take this city back for the people of Stoke-on-Trent.
Here's an article from yesterdays Sentinel.
http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk/news/Designers-work-final-mosque-plans/article-2798370-detail/article.html
contact us at efpstoke@gmail.com
In 2005, this same organisation had income of £1,100,000.
For the next 3 years, the NSREC never published any accounts, despite this breaking the Charity Commission regulations.
In January 2009, the NSREC folded, declared itself bankrupt, and closed its doors, and all of this was done with no investigation into the closure at all.
Judging by the success of the NSREC in 04/05, it seems reasonable to expect it to have done similarly well in
06/07/08, so monies that are to this day unaccounted for would be at least £3 million.
The NSREC was run by muslims, and was used as a way of channelling public money into the bme community, with 14 of the 16 executive positions being held by muslims, but it is the breach of another law that really catches the eye.
Charities have to by law, be none political, yet reading through the officers and committee members of the NSREC, is like a roll call of local councillors.
Of the top 4 honourary positions, 3 were muslim, with Bagh Ali and Karamat Ali both serving councillors, and Sajida Ahmed an ex-councillor. Other councillors involved were, Mohammed Pervez( membership panel), Elaine Blake( exec committee), Randolph Conteh( exec committee), Anita Gill( exec committee), Mohammed Matloob( exec committee).
By law, charities are to be none political, so if this is none political, where are the Tory councillors, the BNP councillors? This entire organisation was nothing more than a muslim lovefest from start to finish, and the so called upstanding citizens involved in this mess have turned out to be nothing more than liars and cheats, and now Stoke-on-Trent city council are producing the ingredients for it to happen again.
In 2008, Stoke-on-Trent city council agreed to planning permission for a £1.5 million mosque in Normacot, to appease the ever growing muslim population that has colonised the south of our city.
By the time the Regent Street mosque in Hanley is finished, it will have cost almost £2 million, the muslims now want to build a £1.5 million mosque in Normacot. The question I have is this; if they can raise £3.5/£4 million for two buildings, what the hell are Stoke-on-Trent taxpayers been made to give them money for?
We have immigrant councillors that do not concern themselves with the white people of their wards, and if you want proof of this, just ask the white people of Tunstall what the muslim councillors do for them.
We have a list of outsiders that are running the city council, when what this city needs is people from inside it running the council, people who have genuine affection for the city and its people, and we need this soon or the city will become nothing more than a dumping ground for all the third world dross.
It's about time that the Stoke EDL division started to make its presence felt as well. Asda, Tesco, Waitrose,
Somerfield, all selling halal meat, our schools all serving halal meat, yet not a peep from the EDL!
One giant eyesore of a mosque in Hanley, another planned for Normacot, yet not a peep from Stoke EDL!
All of us native people need to come together to rescue our city from the grasping hands of immigrants and political chancers, and that will include getting everyone registered to vote, so come election time, we can oust these interlopers and take this city back for the people of Stoke-on-Trent.
Here's an article from yesterdays Sentinel.
http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk/news/Designers-work-final-mosque-plans/article-2798370-detail/article.html
contact us at efpstoke@gmail.com
Monday, 25 October 2010
The English Defence League??
Friday, 22 October 2010
The irony seems to have by-passed those EDL leaders who front an organisation called the English Defence League, but which includes afro-caribbeans, jews, hindus. These may well be upstanding guys, but they're not bloody English!
And Tommy Robinsons determination to drag the jews into this organisation by promoting Israel, what the hell does that have to do with saving our country from this foreign invasion?
Here's an article from Nemesis that was posted on the Northwestnationalists site.
SUPPRESSED BY THE LIBERAL ESTABLISHMENT: THE FRAGILE NATURE OF LEICESTER’S MULTICULTURAL PROMISE
By Nemesis
On Saturday 9th October up to 1,000 members of the English Defence League (EDL) targeted Leicester as part of their national strategy to stage protests against the emergence of Islamo-fascism and the growing threat of Muslim terrorism.
Whilst I have reservations against facets of the EDL – the growing rift between leadership and the rank-and-file, their tactics and their over-stressed reliance on their quest for multicultural support – I believe that the EDL marks one of the most important developments within British Nationalism for decades.
Despite criticism from the State-sponsored assets of the BNP and other Nationalists the EDL have provided a platform to voice the opinions and anger of millions of white working-class people, mainly males, and have created a major force to challenge the liberal Establishment. The EDL has overnight become a vehicle for many white working-class males to vent their anger and energies at an increasingly belligerent and untrustworthy Establishment which only represents the interests of the global capitalists and Corporations. Hence the reason why the Establishment has allied itself with the growing power of Muslims both with the UK and across Europe.
However, it is wrong for the EDL and any other nationalist movement to equate the Taliban with home-grown Islamic terrorist groups and ideology. The real enemy is Militant Islam and Muslim Colonisation. The reason is that the Taliban were created by Western Intelligence organisations in the 1990s and since then this ‘threat’ has been used by Governments to instill fear amongst Western populations and to justify the West’s involvment in the Middle East, primarily for oil and Israel.
The CIA worked with Pakistan to create the Taliban as a bulwark against the former Soviet Union. Most of the money to arm the Taliban originated from Saudi Arabia. In the 1980s even the SAS became involved in training the Mujahideen, taking orders from the CIA. Osama bin Laden is even reported to have been personally recruited by the CIA in 1979 in Istanbul. In 1988, bin Laden discussed the establishment of a new military group, which became known as Al-Qaeda, and the US became involved in their training. Al-Qaeda means ‘the database’ and was originally the master file of mujahiden who had been recruited and trained with help from the CIA to help defeat the Soviets.
Thus it would be the wrong strategy for the EDL to fall into the hands of the State and its lies by identifying against the ‘Taliban’ and Islamic terrorists. The real threat is against home-grown Islamic terrorists and extremists, all of which have been encouraged by the West and the UK in particular to come to our lands in exchange for easier access to Middle Eastern oil. We must ignore the propaganda of the Intelligence Agencies and the of the Establishment into identifying the enemy which they themselves have created in order to accept a united international leadership for a false war against ‘terrorism’, ie for oil and Israel. This false threat is simply helping the International Global Elite to form a New World Order. We must be aware of the false reality that is being placed overt us by thee State Illusionists and Puppet-Masters. The BNP under Griffin and Barnes has already been coerced into accepting this false perception of reality, becoming simply an anti-Muslim movement working with Israel and the NWO. The EDL cannot afford to be used in this way and instead must focus on Militant Islam and the Islamic Colonisation of Britain as the threats that must be opposed.
The EDL needs also to reassert its original roots of representing England for the English (and of course Scotland for the Scots, Wales for the Welsh and so on), instead of trying to appeal to the multicultural community, most of whom cannot be considered English, or Scottish, or Welsh ethnically. These national forms of identity are ethnically-driven and cannot be taken by for example, a south Asian, an Afro-Caribbean or African. By all means members of the multicultural communities can show their opposition to Islam and Islamic terrorism by supporting the EDL, but the EDL must in the future be an ethnic identity organisation FOR the English (or Scottish or Welsh with their own separate Defence League organisations). It gives the wrong signal to the public that anyone can be English (or Scottish or Welsh), making our indigenous British identities worthless. The EDL must be for the English. The SDL for the Scots, and the WDL for the Welsh.
The local establishment – the local newspaper, the Leicester Mercury (known locally as the Leicester Mockery for its un-newsworthy stories and PC bias), BBC Radio Leicester and Leicester City Council – all conspired to hype up the EDL march weeks in advance and pressure the Government into banning it (which they successfully did, although the EDL continued with their staged protest by limiting it to a static protest which is within the banning order). The local establishment mouthpieces of propaganda put out a considerable amount of hype and opposition to the EDL, both before and after the event that it was clear that the EDL posed a serious threat to them. In fact, what the Establishment feared was a challenge to their Marxist orthodoxy of the multicultural society, and since Leicester is generally regarded as a ‘success’ story (ie whites are soon to be come a minority within their own city in the very near future), the EDL protest was regarded as dangerous and subversive by those in power.
This shows the fragility of so-called race relations within Leicester. Surely, if the race relations industry and local establishment believes in their multicultural experiment so much then they would welcome a challenge, and if the local multicultural society was as strong as they try and let us think then any threat to that structure would have been ignored or derided. Instead the bastions of local multicultural orthodoxy tried to counter the EDL threat by setting up local events on the Friday before with a ‘peace vigil’ (ie Marxist UAF and liberal do-gooders) and a mini-festival organised by the Marxist puppet-masters, ‘Hope Not Hate’,with Marxist idiots like Billy Bragg and Reverend and the Makers, plus assorted multicult puppets to keep the somatised and brainwashed crowds happy, mostly colonists and some white liberal idiots who clearly lack any semblance of intelligence, preferring their opinions to be given to them by others rather than thinking for themselves.
The level of hype was such that one could have been forgiven into thinking that the city was intending to be visited by an invasion force hell bent on wrecking the city. On the evening prior to the event saw a number of shop fronts being boarded up in advance of the EDL protest and the confrontation by the far-Left Establishment traitors, the UAF.
A group of us went around Leicester city on the Friday removing as many of the so-called green ‘peace’ ribbons that had been strewn around lamp posts and trees by the fanatical Marxist army of idiots and do-gooders, We did our civic duty in clearing up the Leicester streets by dumping the silly ribbons where they belong – in the bin. Green was chosen by the Marxist idiots in protest at the EDL as it was regarded as a ‘non-partisan colour’. Since the UAF and ‘Hope Not Hate’ clowns had organised this political protest the ribbons should have been red to signify their Marxist credentials.
As it was the EDL protest passed off relatively peacefully with only 17 arrested and not the major riot that had been anticipated. The EDL had gathered in several pubs near Hotel Street that had been allocated to them by the police and these gatherings passed off peacefully with great solidarity and good-natured drinking and patriotic fervor. It was only until the EDL were abused and goaded by local Muslim gangs and crowds of UAF supporters (and probably police agent provacateurs) that some members of the EDL reacted out of frustration.
It would be better for the strategy of the EDL if they did not co-operate with the police or authorities. Any form of co-operation with the hated authorities, the enemy within, is usually marked by betrayal by them. The EDL should consider working autonomously and spontaneously, and not give the authorities any notice of protests. The aim of the EDL is to smash Militant Islam and they cannot work with the Inner Enemy, which is the Left-liberal Establishment. You cannot expect to rout and smash an enemy by co-operating with those who work and even favour the Muslim extremists. Both must be by-passed and if necessary confronted at some level and at some stage. The Establishment are simply traitors and cannot be trusted, only confronted and smashed.
At about 4pm as the static protest began to be moved out a healthy group of 200 EDL supporters managed to break out of the protest area and through police lines, skirmishing with Muslim gangs and UAF up around the inner city areas close to the Asian and Black stronghold of Highfields, known locally as ‘The Jungle’. A huge crowd of Muslims had gathered, some from West Midlands Muslim gangs, in Highfields and around their mosques, but were prevented from invading the city centre by police.
It was self-evident that the police, in implementing the local social cohesion strategic plans with the local authority, were desperate to prevent the EDL from going near Highfields where rioting may have ignited. Violent clashes between Muslims and blacks against the white EDL occurred around the eastern inner ring-road area of the city, close to Highfields, many of the Asian Muslim gangs being driven back into their colonised territory of Highfields. It was a delight to see white youths, many of them English, chasing the once belligerent gangs of Muslim Asians out of the city centre, back into their dirty slums of Highfields. For so long these arrogant Muslim gangs have been able to take over the city centre as they have done so in Highfields, and swagger around as if they own the place, ignored by the local police. On that Saturday the EDL retook those streets and taught the Muslim colonists that although the white liberal politicians and Establishment are appeasers and have fallen down at the colonists’ feet to worship ‘diversity’ and ‘equality’, there are some white men and women who have not given up and are prepared to fight the Muslim aggressors.
Let this be a lesson to the Muslim colonists and the Marxist aggressors. When the EDL visit Leicester again it is hoped that the EDL turn-out will be far larger, better organised and led, and more determined to retake the city streets from those colonists and their white Marxist appeasers.
Video of the EDL in action in Leicester
http://www.truthtube.tv/play.php?vid=4448
These are video clips of the UAF/Muslims preparing to die and go to their ‘paradise’ (as stated in one of the titles of these clips) when opposing the EDL Leicester demo, and antagonising the EDL, with Asians showing blatant racism towards the white English.
The white liberal Establishment need to wake up to the truth of the reality of Militant Islam and the failure of the Multicultural Experiment. They should show these videos to a wider public instead of apologising for Muslims and attacking the EDL for defending our culture.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHDm2Rnaobc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-lREVwahRc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8icfEtUuShk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYENQVMqvFs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQX4qwNW-qI
This is what happened when the Muslim gangs were confronted by only a fraction of the EDL in Leicester.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvTjslswcSk
Tell me that Leicester does not have hundreds of Muslim extremists:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHDm2Rnaobc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-lREVwahRc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8icfEtUuShk
If these would ever meet head on with a full EDL demo I am confident that it would result in massive local social disturbances and a racial clash. The police would not be able to control the clashes, and nor would they be able or interested in controlling the massed ranks of local Asian Muslim gangs.
Our British ruling liberal elite leaders have allowed this mass immigration dangerous colonisation into Leicester and other parts of England.
I hate the British liberal elite with vengeance!
Civil unrest is coming.
THE TRAITOROUS LIBERAL ELITE AND ESTABLISHMENT HAVE BEEN WARNED. WHAT THEY HAVE DONE WITHIN THE LAST 40 YEARS WILL HAUNT THEM.
THE ENGLISH ARE BEGINNING TO STIR AND THE RESISTANCE IS GROWING.
JOIN IT NOW!
contact us at; efpstoke@gmail.com
Friday, 22 October 2010
£900k down the toilet!
Ex-mayor Mark Merediths boyfriend, Merv "the perv" Smith, has been re-elected to his former position of councillor, either by gerrymandering by the Labour party, or the stupidity of the people that live in his ward, and I genuinely hope it's gerrymandering.
Carrying on from where his lunatic uaf boyfriend stopped, Merv the perv is now advocating the spending of another £900,000 on tarting up the approaches to Hanley. Now there are a number of problems with this idea.
First off, in the middle of a severe financial crisis, the least sensible thing to do is spend just under a £1 million on something that will earn no money. On top of the £2 million Meredith spent already tarting up the entrances to Hanley, this smacks of the most naive use of funds possible!
The second problem is why spend money on the approaches to Hanley, when half of the said town has been demolished and not replaced? They constantly talk about the plans being drawn up for the rebuilding of Hanley, but that is the only money these morons spend. Somewhere in the Civic Centre is a bloody cupboardful of drawn up plans, that have cost us a fortune, but that will never be used.
And as for that so-called modern design bus station, it looks like a crashed UFO!
Look at some of the other wastes of money these Labour donkeys are responsible for. Meredith spent £730,000 on carpets, curtains, and furnishings for the top floor of the Civic Centre, and he is also responsible for the cutting down of 21 trees and replacing them with?.............................. that's right, a sculpture of a tree!! That was another £350,000!
There was £15 million overspend on the Cultural Quarter, £10 million bill for the failed Worldgate project,
£6 million overspend on the Tunstall Northern By-pass, £2 million wasted on the tarting up of Hanley, there was the removal of £60 million back to government because Stoke-on-Trent city council were too slow in spending it!
It's a miserable tale of one cock up after another!
I don't know why the city council don't just drop all pretence, demolish what's left of Hanley, and spend what's left of our budget laying in a golden path to the Regent Street mosque, the epicentre of everything this crappy council hold dear.
Carrying on from where his lunatic uaf boyfriend stopped, Merv the perv is now advocating the spending of another £900,000 on tarting up the approaches to Hanley. Now there are a number of problems with this idea.
First off, in the middle of a severe financial crisis, the least sensible thing to do is spend just under a £1 million on something that will earn no money. On top of the £2 million Meredith spent already tarting up the entrances to Hanley, this smacks of the most naive use of funds possible!
The second problem is why spend money on the approaches to Hanley, when half of the said town has been demolished and not replaced? They constantly talk about the plans being drawn up for the rebuilding of Hanley, but that is the only money these morons spend. Somewhere in the Civic Centre is a bloody cupboardful of drawn up plans, that have cost us a fortune, but that will never be used.
And as for that so-called modern design bus station, it looks like a crashed UFO!
Look at some of the other wastes of money these Labour donkeys are responsible for. Meredith spent £730,000 on carpets, curtains, and furnishings for the top floor of the Civic Centre, and he is also responsible for the cutting down of 21 trees and replacing them with?.............................. that's right, a sculpture of a tree!! That was another £350,000!
There was £15 million overspend on the Cultural Quarter, £10 million bill for the failed Worldgate project,
£6 million overspend on the Tunstall Northern By-pass, £2 million wasted on the tarting up of Hanley, there was the removal of £60 million back to government because Stoke-on-Trent city council were too slow in spending it!
It's a miserable tale of one cock up after another!
I don't know why the city council don't just drop all pretence, demolish what's left of Hanley, and spend what's left of our budget laying in a golden path to the Regent Street mosque, the epicentre of everything this crappy council hold dear.
Monday, 18 October 2010
Why no news on fight in the park??
Last week, a friend of mine contacted me to tell me he had been turned away from driving past central forest park by the police.
No reason for this was given.
My friend however, was at the time taking his niece home, and her mobile phone was receiving message after message concerning the goings on in the park.
Unknown to us at the time, preparations were under way for Samba Mela- a celebration of the enforced multiculturalism which stains this city- but something went drastically wrong.
The messages on my friends nieces phone indicate that a series of fights had broken out across the site, and that the asian instigators of this unwanted festival were on the receiving end of a good hiding, but what we can't figure out, because the establishment has covered up this incident, is what the hell it was all about.
Now it's clearly something to do with immigrants, otherwise the names and faces of the white perpetrators would be plastered all over the pages of the Sentinel, but no-ones talking, so if you have any knowledge of what has happened, if you were there, or saw anything, I'll put our contact details below.
This is important. The only time things of this nature get covered up is when the establishment don't want us to see the extent of trouble from their favourite people, so when you've read this, please pass it on, talk to the youngsters in and around your family, and let's see if we can discover what it is that so many seem intent on hiding.
contact us at; efpstoke@gmail.com
text or call- 07955 142 653
No reason for this was given.
My friend however, was at the time taking his niece home, and her mobile phone was receiving message after message concerning the goings on in the park.
Unknown to us at the time, preparations were under way for Samba Mela- a celebration of the enforced multiculturalism which stains this city- but something went drastically wrong.
The messages on my friends nieces phone indicate that a series of fights had broken out across the site, and that the asian instigators of this unwanted festival were on the receiving end of a good hiding, but what we can't figure out, because the establishment has covered up this incident, is what the hell it was all about.
Now it's clearly something to do with immigrants, otherwise the names and faces of the white perpetrators would be plastered all over the pages of the Sentinel, but no-ones talking, so if you have any knowledge of what has happened, if you were there, or saw anything, I'll put our contact details below.
This is important. The only time things of this nature get covered up is when the establishment don't want us to see the extent of trouble from their favourite people, so when you've read this, please pass it on, talk to the youngsters in and around your family, and let's see if we can discover what it is that so many seem intent on hiding.
contact us at; efpstoke@gmail.com
text or call- 07955 142 653
Saturday, 16 October 2010
Jobs for the boys!
This city council is absolutely the perfect example of fraud, corruption, and dodgy dealing, and that is highlighted by its latest salaried appointment.
Hardial Bhogal, the head of Renew, and complete and utter waste of bloody time, has been promised direct employment by the senior officers of this scabby council, as "director of place".
The freemason, Common Purpose infested city council have offered him a position that encompasses that of the previous head of the NSRP( North Staffs Regeneration Partnership), Tom Macartney.
Read this article from the Guardian, 2002, to give you some idea of the calibre of this drain on council finances.
Walsall chief resigns before sacking vote
Hardial Bhogal, the head of Renew, and complete and utter waste of bloody time, has been promised direct employment by the senior officers of this scabby council, as "director of place".
The freemason, Common Purpose infested city council have offered him a position that encompasses that of the previous head of the NSRP( North Staffs Regeneration Partnership), Tom Macartney.
Read this article from the Guardian, 2002, to give you some idea of the calibre of this drain on council finances.
Walsall chief resigns before sacking vote
- Society Guardian, Tuesday 16 July 2002 15.23 BST
- Article history
A local authority branded a failure by the government was today looking for a new boss after its chief executive resigned hours before a vote on whether to sack him.
Hardial Bhogal quit as chief of Walsall council yesterday - shortly before councillors decided to dismiss him and other senior managers.
Mr Bhogal's resignation follows a damning audit commission report in June which recommended that a private sector management team should be brought in to improve the council's failing services.
A Walsall spokesman said today: "The council voted last night to comply with the recommendations from the audit commission that the senior management team be replaced. It was a very difficult decision for the councillors to make. They felt the council needed to move forward and get government help rather than government interference."
Mr Bhogal is to be temporarily replaced by the chief executive of Telford and Wrekin council, Michael Frater.
Walsall had been referred to the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister by the commission after suffering "severe service failures" and management problems.
The council had earlier been criticised by the commission, in January, when it was given until the end of April to demonstrate change. The steps which it took did not go far enough, the commission said.
Inspectors recommended that a new group of private sector managers should replace the council's current executive management, including the chief executive, for up to two years.
The local government minister, Nick Raynsford, said his department had suspended the threat of private sector intervention following the council's decision on its senior management.
"The government agrees with the council's decision to seek new leadership to take forward the demanding programme of improvement needed to improve local services in Walsall," he said.
"I am very pleased that Walsall has taken such a positive step forward in the light of the constructive criticisms they have received from recent inspection reports.
"I welcome the new role assigned to Michael Frater and have every confidence that he, working with the council's leadership and new management team, will make rapid progress in raising the standard of services provided to local people."
And then the senior officers of Stoke-on-Trent city council drag 3rd rate crud like him here, and give him a bloody massive salary!
The local elections in May are the last elections for 4 years, so if the people of Stoke-on-Trent want to see change for this city, they had better vote for it, because once that day is gone, we'll be stuck with your choices for 4 bloody years, so please make the right ones!
contact us at; efpstoke@gmail.com
Hardial Bhogal quit as chief of Walsall council yesterday - shortly before councillors decided to dismiss him and other senior managers.
Mr Bhogal's resignation follows a damning audit commission report in June which recommended that a private sector management team should be brought in to improve the council's failing services.
A Walsall spokesman said today: "The council voted last night to comply with the recommendations from the audit commission that the senior management team be replaced. It was a very difficult decision for the councillors to make. They felt the council needed to move forward and get government help rather than government interference."
Mr Bhogal is to be temporarily replaced by the chief executive of Telford and Wrekin council, Michael Frater.
Walsall had been referred to the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister by the commission after suffering "severe service failures" and management problems.
The council had earlier been criticised by the commission, in January, when it was given until the end of April to demonstrate change. The steps which it took did not go far enough, the commission said.
Inspectors recommended that a new group of private sector managers should replace the council's current executive management, including the chief executive, for up to two years.
The local government minister, Nick Raynsford, said his department had suspended the threat of private sector intervention following the council's decision on its senior management.
"The government agrees with the council's decision to seek new leadership to take forward the demanding programme of improvement needed to improve local services in Walsall," he said.
"I am very pleased that Walsall has taken such a positive step forward in the light of the constructive criticisms they have received from recent inspection reports.
"I welcome the new role assigned to Michael Frater and have every confidence that he, working with the council's leadership and new management team, will make rapid progress in raising the standard of services provided to local people."
And then the senior officers of Stoke-on-Trent city council drag 3rd rate crud like him here, and give him a bloody massive salary!
The local elections in May are the last elections for 4 years, so if the people of Stoke-on-Trent want to see change for this city, they had better vote for it, because once that day is gone, we'll be stuck with your choices for 4 bloody years, so please make the right ones!
contact us at; efpstoke@gmail.com
Friday, 15 October 2010
Turkeys voting for Christmas?
I'm confused.
Prior to being kicked out of office, the Labour government went on a deliberate spending spree, racking up the debt as much as they could for the incoming government.
Understanding full well that cuts would have to be made, and that spending would have to be brought under control, you have to ask why they would do something so deliberately spiteful?
It is clear to most people that Labour are unfit to rule, yet the unions are trying to push employees into strikes designed to unsettle this coalition government, but they say nothing of where the blame lies for the complete and total mess this country is in.
We know why this is, it's because the unions own the Labour party, and Milliband in particular. Without the help of the corrupt and marxist unions, Ed Milliband would never have won the leadership challenge.
He says he is his own man.
Cobblers. He is bought and paid for by the unions, and despite assurances to the contrary, just you wait till the unions start to pull his strings, he'll be dancing to their tune like a marxist Britney Spears!
The entire ideology of Labour is anti-white and anti-British, and the flooding of this country with third world immigrants, their outright refusal to give us a referendum on the EU, their anti-democratic laws that take away our freedom of speech, of association, and of expression, only go to highlight just how bad they are for the British people and their culture.
So why do they keep getting voted in??
And on a local level it's just as bad.
Stoke-on-Trent has been ravaged by pro-immigration, pro-marxist Liberals, who have taken what was a busy industrial region of England, and turned it into a desolate, jobless, demolition site, yet these destructive people get voted back in!!
If the people of Stoke-on-Trent want to see things change, if they want to see jobs and manufacturing brought back for themselves and their children, if we are to provide a feasible future for our youth so that the city itslef then has a future, we need to get rid of the system that is running the Civic Centre at the minute, and replace it with one that will put the English first when it comes to jobs, housing, and benefits.
And there is no way round this. If you wish to avoid the changing of Stoke-on-Trent from an industrial English city into a third world dumping ground for the West Midlands, then what you have to do is simple.
VOTE!!
Things will not change unless you vote for that change, so for those of you out there with your pathetic excuses for letting this country down, think on it.
If you vote for change, change is what you'll get, and all you need to do is get off your arses and walk to the school or church, or whatever building is acting as you polling station, and cast your vote!
None of the 3 main parties are worthy of your vote, all 3 are putting policies in that go directly against what is best for you and this country, and it's time this behaviour was stopped.
Your ONLY choice if you want to stop the destruction of this city, and this country, is to vote for nationalist representatives. Anything else, and you are just another turkey voting for Christmas.
Prior to being kicked out of office, the Labour government went on a deliberate spending spree, racking up the debt as much as they could for the incoming government.
Understanding full well that cuts would have to be made, and that spending would have to be brought under control, you have to ask why they would do something so deliberately spiteful?
It is clear to most people that Labour are unfit to rule, yet the unions are trying to push employees into strikes designed to unsettle this coalition government, but they say nothing of where the blame lies for the complete and total mess this country is in.
We know why this is, it's because the unions own the Labour party, and Milliband in particular. Without the help of the corrupt and marxist unions, Ed Milliband would never have won the leadership challenge.
He says he is his own man.
Cobblers. He is bought and paid for by the unions, and despite assurances to the contrary, just you wait till the unions start to pull his strings, he'll be dancing to their tune like a marxist Britney Spears!
The entire ideology of Labour is anti-white and anti-British, and the flooding of this country with third world immigrants, their outright refusal to give us a referendum on the EU, their anti-democratic laws that take away our freedom of speech, of association, and of expression, only go to highlight just how bad they are for the British people and their culture.
So why do they keep getting voted in??
And on a local level it's just as bad.
Stoke-on-Trent has been ravaged by pro-immigration, pro-marxist Liberals, who have taken what was a busy industrial region of England, and turned it into a desolate, jobless, demolition site, yet these destructive people get voted back in!!
If the people of Stoke-on-Trent want to see things change, if they want to see jobs and manufacturing brought back for themselves and their children, if we are to provide a feasible future for our youth so that the city itslef then has a future, we need to get rid of the system that is running the Civic Centre at the minute, and replace it with one that will put the English first when it comes to jobs, housing, and benefits.
And there is no way round this. If you wish to avoid the changing of Stoke-on-Trent from an industrial English city into a third world dumping ground for the West Midlands, then what you have to do is simple.
VOTE!!
Things will not change unless you vote for that change, so for those of you out there with your pathetic excuses for letting this country down, think on it.
If you vote for change, change is what you'll get, and all you need to do is get off your arses and walk to the school or church, or whatever building is acting as you polling station, and cast your vote!
None of the 3 main parties are worthy of your vote, all 3 are putting policies in that go directly against what is best for you and this country, and it's time this behaviour was stopped.
Your ONLY choice if you want to stop the destruction of this city, and this country, is to vote for nationalist representatives. Anything else, and you are just another turkey voting for Christmas.
Thursday, 14 October 2010
Ideas for a better city.
We all moan and groan at the 3rd rate job being done by the senior officers of this council, and of the terrible state this city is in, but it isn't enough to complain, if we really want to get this city started, then we need to come up with our own ideas on how to do it.
Spencer Cartilidge, Mark Leat, Sam Tunstall, Terry Cope, and myself, have talked briefly about what we need to see implemented by the city council in order to see this city rise, these are some of the ideas we came up with.
contact us at; efpstoke@gmail.com
Spencer Cartilidge, Mark Leat, Sam Tunstall, Terry Cope, and myself, have talked briefly about what we need to see implemented by the city council in order to see this city rise, these are some of the ideas we came up with.
- Slash council officer salaries- they take far too much. Halving the salary bill for senior officers would save millions for the people of this city.
- Allocate houses to Stoke-on-Trent people first
- Extend the canal system instead of building all these roads, use it for local travel and haulage, and to attract visitors to the area..
- Withdraw from all bodies that aren't solely concerned with Stoke-on-Trent. They are called Stoke-on-Trent city council for a reason, that reason being that is what they are supposed to look after, not north Staffs, or the West Midlands.
- Make it a part of the contract that anyone working for Stoke-on-Trent city council, lives within the city limits.
- Abolish free parking for city council employees. Everyone else has to pay, including doctors and nurses, so there's no reason why the city counci shouldn't be doing the same.
- This city council should do much more of its own recycling. Done properly, there are both jobs and profits in this.
- England First would put up proper Christmas decorations, not this politically correct crap our present council put up.
- Have the city council run council housing, not have it farmed out to housing associations more interested in housing immigrants than local people.
- Have the city council put contracts through local businesses, then have those businesses take on apprentices in exchange for being given council contracts.
contact us at; efpstoke@gmail.com
Wednesday, 13 October 2010
Even the far left say we're full!
I'm shocked and stunned!
When the far left dross from the far left website of spits'n'spots come out into the open and say that there is no more room in Stoke-on-Trent for the endless queue of asylum seekers, I thought I had suffered an embolism., but according to chief stirrer Tony 'The' Walley, this is the situation.
Read this, and try not laugh at the hypocrisy of what he says.
11 Oct 2010
When the far left dross from the far left website of spits'n'spots come out into the open and say that there is no more room in Stoke-on-Trent for the endless queue of asylum seekers, I thought I had suffered an embolism., but according to chief stirrer Tony 'The' Walley, this is the situation.
Read this, and try not laugh at the hypocrisy of what he says.
Tony Walley - On My Stoke-on-Trent Soapbox
11 Oct 2010
I haven’t had a good old rant for a while and while life in Stoke-on-Trent isn’t that bad, some of the issues attracting national press coverage is getting me slightly hot under the collar.
Asylum Seekers – A Home From Home?
Birmingham City Council, the country’s largest Local Authority, has decided that it will not house anymore Asylum Seekers in the future.
Birmingham City Council will not renew its five-year contract with the UK Border Agency, meaning not a single immigrant will be granted asylum there by the public sector after June next year.
No, so where do you think they will be looking to stick all these immigrants?
That's right! Stoke-on-Trent.
The Councillor in charge of housing, Cllr John Lines, said that the move was not to save money, neither was it racist or political. He said it was designed to protect Brummies.
Wolverhampton are also considering ending their agreement with the UK Border Agency.
In the past year, some 1000 Asylum Seekers have been settled in Birmingham but the Agency has only paid for the housing of 200 of them.
Britain’s second city has an estimated 6500 homeless, some living rough on the streets.
To me it is refreshing for a mainstream politician to come out and make his city’s sons and daughters his No 1 priority. It matters not about creed or colour, it’s about looking after your own in times of need.
What a bloody hypocrite! Whenever we have said that a sons and daughters policy should be in place, they called us racists!!
In Stoke-on-Trent , at the end of December 2009, there were 515 Asylum Seekers [not including their dependents] housed in the City. Most were living in accommodation not supplied by our City Council.
In a progressive society, we should give asylum to the most needy cases. All civil societies across the world should help shoulder the burden.
More lefty billshut! The UN states that asylum seekers should go to the NEAREST SAFE COUNTRY. Britiain is not the nearsest safe country to any of the places these immigrants come from, so we should turn them away!
Asylum and Immigration are inevitable but must be kept to levels where the native population do not feel second best.
Can you believe the hypocrisy of this lefty tosser?!
It's too bloody late, we natives are treated as second best in our own country, and it's thanks to morons like you!!
The Politics of the far right have prospered on the lies and myths their supporters have perpetrated that have gone unchallenged by our mainstream political parties.
At the last general election, immigration was forced to the top of the agenda. Politicians actually started to recognise [not that they didn’t know, they just chose to ignore it] that the issue was a real concern to Joe & Josie Public. It doesn’t make our society racist, it just means that our population have genuine concerns for theirs, and their children’s future.
So which is it?
First off you slate the nationalists for bringing up the subject, then you say those responsible for creating this situation now need to do something about it!
At last! Confirmation from the left that nationalists have been right all along by calling for the housing of native people first!
If there is an ongoing debate on asylum and immigration, with our mainstream politicians taking the lead [Ed Miliband didn’t shy away from the issue during the Labour Leadership Contest], the move to the far right will become a distant memory of the past.
In your dreams, tubby!
The politics of hate, division and intolerance can be put to bed once and for all!.
Only if we get you and your fellow PC liberal, marxist freemasons booted out of power!
The politics of hate are the politics of the left, and they hate the white British!
Wolverhampton, Birmingham, and now Coventry, have all said they are full up and cannot house anymore asylum seekers. The danger for Stoke-on-Trent is that the far left scum that hold power here, will ignore the wishes of the natives of this city, and stuff it full of these immigrants.
The north of the city where I live already resembles the United Nations, yet local indigenous people can't get a property!
At the next elections, the people of Stoke-on-Trent have to vote these people out, or they will have to say goodbye to their city as it becomes a dumping ground for all the foreign flotsam in the West Midlands.
When you've read this, make sure and pass it on, so the people of this city get some understanding of what's being done to them behind their backs.
contact us at; efpstoke@gmail.com
Asylum Seekers – A Home From Home?
Birmingham City Council, the country’s largest Local Authority, has decided that it will not house anymore Asylum Seekers in the future.
Birmingham City Council will not renew its five-year contract with the UK Border Agency, meaning not a single immigrant will be granted asylum there by the public sector after June next year.
No, so where do you think they will be looking to stick all these immigrants?
That's right! Stoke-on-Trent.
The Councillor in charge of housing, Cllr John Lines, said that the move was not to save money, neither was it racist or political. He said it was designed to protect Brummies.
"Hundreds of Brummies, hundreds of my people are in B&Bs instead of council-provided homes. Why should that be? My people have got to come first. "The asylum seekers arrive here, they have a blooming family and they keep having children - it's a burden on the system.
"If people say I'm racist then I'd say we've got Brummies of all colours here, third or fourth generation Asians and blacks, but if you say I'm putting Birmingham people first, then, yes, I am."
Cllr Lines is a Conservative Councillor and is the Cabinet Member for Housing and it seems that his concerns are spreading."If people say I'm racist then I'd say we've got Brummies of all colours here, third or fourth generation Asians and blacks, but if you say I'm putting Birmingham people first, then, yes, I am."
Wolverhampton are also considering ending their agreement with the UK Border Agency.
In the past year, some 1000 Asylum Seekers have been settled in Birmingham but the Agency has only paid for the housing of 200 of them.
Britain’s second city has an estimated 6500 homeless, some living rough on the streets.
To me it is refreshing for a mainstream politician to come out and make his city’s sons and daughters his No 1 priority. It matters not about creed or colour, it’s about looking after your own in times of need.
What a bloody hypocrite! Whenever we have said that a sons and daughters policy should be in place, they called us racists!!
In Stoke-on-Trent , at the end of December 2009, there were 515 Asylum Seekers [not including their dependents] housed in the City. Most were living in accommodation not supplied by our City Council.
In a progressive society, we should give asylum to the most needy cases. All civil societies across the world should help shoulder the burden.
More lefty billshut! The UN states that asylum seekers should go to the NEAREST SAFE COUNTRY. Britiain is not the nearsest safe country to any of the places these immigrants come from, so we should turn them away!
Asylum and Immigration are inevitable but must be kept to levels where the native population do not feel second best.
Can you believe the hypocrisy of this lefty tosser?!
It's too bloody late, we natives are treated as second best in our own country, and it's thanks to morons like you!!
The Politics of the far right have prospered on the lies and myths their supporters have perpetrated that have gone unchallenged by our mainstream political parties.
At the last general election, immigration was forced to the top of the agenda. Politicians actually started to recognise [not that they didn’t know, they just chose to ignore it] that the issue was a real concern to Joe & Josie Public. It doesn’t make our society racist, it just means that our population have genuine concerns for theirs, and their children’s future.
So which is it?
First off you slate the nationalists for bringing up the subject, then you say those responsible for creating this situation now need to do something about it!
At last! Confirmation from the left that nationalists have been right all along by calling for the housing of native people first!
If there is an ongoing debate on asylum and immigration, with our mainstream politicians taking the lead [Ed Miliband didn’t shy away from the issue during the Labour Leadership Contest], the move to the far right will become a distant memory of the past.
In your dreams, tubby!
The politics of hate, division and intolerance can be put to bed once and for all!.
Only if we get you and your fellow PC liberal, marxist freemasons booted out of power!
The politics of hate are the politics of the left, and they hate the white British!
Wolverhampton, Birmingham, and now Coventry, have all said they are full up and cannot house anymore asylum seekers. The danger for Stoke-on-Trent is that the far left scum that hold power here, will ignore the wishes of the natives of this city, and stuff it full of these immigrants.
The north of the city where I live already resembles the United Nations, yet local indigenous people can't get a property!
At the next elections, the people of Stoke-on-Trent have to vote these people out, or they will have to say goodbye to their city as it becomes a dumping ground for all the foreign flotsam in the West Midlands.
When you've read this, make sure and pass it on, so the people of this city get some understanding of what's being done to them behind their backs.
contact us at; efpstoke@gmail.com
Tuesday, 12 October 2010
3rd rate councillors wrecking this city.
I have lost count of the number of times stupid, incompetent, or even criminal decisions have been made by councillors of this city, to the detriment of this city.
If you want proof of that, look around, this is no longer a city, it's just one big demolition site!
And the crap councillors we have are the nub of the problem, because it is these people that are letting schemes and policies through that do nothing for the city; its people or its reputation.
The complete and utter waste of space that is Joy Garner, sidestepped out of making the decision on whether or not the Licensing committee would agree to the issuing of a 24 hr license to Tesco in order to sell alcohol.
Now since the moronic inception by Blair of 24 hour drinking, violent crime has more than doubled. In granting licenses to these supermarkets to sell cheap booze, whilst at the same time overseeing the closure of almost 30 pubs per week! (http://www.beerandpub.com/documents/publications/news/NR%200508%20-%20pub%20numbers.pdf).
And look at who made the decision to allow this, (behind closed doors once again!)
Why would anyone agree to this when its only possible effect on the community will be negative?
In particular, why would a muslim councillor agree to this? I thought they looked upon alcohol as a sinful thing, so why encourage selling even more of it?
Alcohol should be sold in pubs, clubs, and official off licenses, not supermarkets that stack it high, sell it cheap, in their constant search for ever larger profits, despite the fact they profit to the tune of £7 billion a year, give or take. When are Tesco's going to show some responsibility to the communities they leech off?
There should be a complete halt to the issuing of alcohol licenses to every bloody cornershop in the city as well.
Its funny how the muslims make a song and dance about alcohol, that is until the profits are heading into their pockets, all of a sudden their objections are missing, clearly because they are too busy counting the profits!
Our local government is terminally corrupt, businesses likle Tesco's are clearly concerned with nothing but the profit column, and no-one from the establishment seems to be concerned with the damage being inflicted on this city by selfish policies pushed forward by greedy and unscrupulous local politicians.
The Civic Centre needs cleaned out from top to bottom, like so many other towns and cities in this country.
If we can start to stop the rot locally, perhaps we can slow it down nationally.
contact us at; efpstoke@gmail.com
If you want proof of that, look around, this is no longer a city, it's just one big demolition site!
And the crap councillors we have are the nub of the problem, because it is these people that are letting schemes and policies through that do nothing for the city; its people or its reputation.
The complete and utter waste of space that is Joy Garner, sidestepped out of making the decision on whether or not the Licensing committee would agree to the issuing of a 24 hr license to Tesco in order to sell alcohol.
Now since the moronic inception by Blair of 24 hour drinking, violent crime has more than doubled. In granting licenses to these supermarkets to sell cheap booze, whilst at the same time overseeing the closure of almost 30 pubs per week! (http://www.beerandpub.com/documents/publications/news/NR%200508%20-%20pub%20numbers.pdf).
And look at who made the decision to allow this, (behind closed doors once again!)
Why would anyone agree to this when its only possible effect on the community will be negative?
In particular, why would a muslim councillor agree to this? I thought they looked upon alcohol as a sinful thing, so why encourage selling even more of it?
Alcohol should be sold in pubs, clubs, and official off licenses, not supermarkets that stack it high, sell it cheap, in their constant search for ever larger profits, despite the fact they profit to the tune of £7 billion a year, give or take. When are Tesco's going to show some responsibility to the communities they leech off?
There should be a complete halt to the issuing of alcohol licenses to every bloody cornershop in the city as well.
Its funny how the muslims make a song and dance about alcohol, that is until the profits are heading into their pockets, all of a sudden their objections are missing, clearly because they are too busy counting the profits!
Our local government is terminally corrupt, businesses likle Tesco's are clearly concerned with nothing but the profit column, and no-one from the establishment seems to be concerned with the damage being inflicted on this city by selfish policies pushed forward by greedy and unscrupulous local politicians.
The Civic Centre needs cleaned out from top to bottom, like so many other towns and cities in this country.
If we can start to stop the rot locally, perhaps we can slow it down nationally.
contact us at; efpstoke@gmail.com
Monday, 11 October 2010
Housing immigrants before our own.
There are several of us that have warned of the dangers of having to house the overspill from Birmingham, yet despite Stoke-on-Trents housing list of 12,000 people, the city council continues to put imigrants into the vacant properties it runs.
And it's now become clear why this is the case.
Both Coventry and Birmingham city councils have both said they have no more places for asylum seekers, and are going to withdraw from the government funded programme that encouraged this behaviour.
The question is now, where will the government look to house its favoured people?
Stoke-on-Trent, that's where! In the north of the city where I live, the black immigrant population has taken a massive jump, yet when you ask the city council about it, they don't keep the numbers, they don't know what you're talking about. Well the census should shed some light on just how many more immigrants have been shoehorned into Stoke-on-Trent, and just how big the lie is that council have no knowledge of such things.
Stoke-on-Trent is going to end up as the northern tip of a council estate that runs from Birmingham, up. We
will see the greenbelt between Birmingham and Stoke disappear, as it is eaten up for housing for this endless flood of immigration that is using up what little reserves we have, whilst at the same time putting an unbearable strain on our services, and still this government refuses to stop it!
I've seen and heard lots of locals declare their love for this city and its people, but then in the very next breath say how they don't vote!
Well, here are your choices, register to vote, and vote for real change, or watch as your city becomes a dumping ground for third world tat that will milk you dry. These are the two possible futures that face the people of this city, you'd better decide what it is you want.
And it's now become clear why this is the case.
Both Coventry and Birmingham city councils have both said they have no more places for asylum seekers, and are going to withdraw from the government funded programme that encouraged this behaviour.
The question is now, where will the government look to house its favoured people?
Stoke-on-Trent, that's where! In the north of the city where I live, the black immigrant population has taken a massive jump, yet when you ask the city council about it, they don't keep the numbers, they don't know what you're talking about. Well the census should shed some light on just how many more immigrants have been shoehorned into Stoke-on-Trent, and just how big the lie is that council have no knowledge of such things.
Stoke-on-Trent is going to end up as the northern tip of a council estate that runs from Birmingham, up. We
will see the greenbelt between Birmingham and Stoke disappear, as it is eaten up for housing for this endless flood of immigration that is using up what little reserves we have, whilst at the same time putting an unbearable strain on our services, and still this government refuses to stop it!
I've seen and heard lots of locals declare their love for this city and its people, but then in the very next breath say how they don't vote!
Well, here are your choices, register to vote, and vote for real change, or watch as your city becomes a dumping ground for third world tat that will milk you dry. These are the two possible futures that face the people of this city, you'd better decide what it is you want.
Sunday, 10 October 2010
Getting our act together.
Mark Leat and myself travelled up to Preston yesterday to meet with the Chairman of the English First Party-Mark Cotterill- and to attend a memorial meeting in honour of British nationalisms greatest figure, John Tyndall.
It was a joy to meet other nationalists from around the country, and listen to speeches from a first class top table that had decades of experience and knowledge between them.
The one thing we were all agreed on, was the need for some kind of umbrella organisation under which all the different nationalist groups could gather. We would like to see a British union of Nationalist organisations, somewhere we could all work together whilst retaining our group identities.
With the news that 4 ex-BNP paid officials have handed in a 100 page complaint to Powys police over Nick Griffins alleged fraud over £100,000, the rapidly collapsing BNP is stranding thousands of decent nationalists who find themselves not wanting to spend money on re-joining, because it is not being used for what it should be, but the ex-officers group Reform BNP are dragging their heels over the starting of a new group to which all these nationalists could join, so they are left in limbo with nowhere to go.
England First Party, Stoke Division would just like to let you nationalists know that there is a home for you here with us, if you so desire.
Text or call. Mobile No. 07955 142653, or e-mail us at efpstoke@gmail.com
It was a joy to meet other nationalists from around the country, and listen to speeches from a first class top table that had decades of experience and knowledge between them.
The one thing we were all agreed on, was the need for some kind of umbrella organisation under which all the different nationalist groups could gather. We would like to see a British union of Nationalist organisations, somewhere we could all work together whilst retaining our group identities.
With the news that 4 ex-BNP paid officials have handed in a 100 page complaint to Powys police over Nick Griffins alleged fraud over £100,000, the rapidly collapsing BNP is stranding thousands of decent nationalists who find themselves not wanting to spend money on re-joining, because it is not being used for what it should be, but the ex-officers group Reform BNP are dragging their heels over the starting of a new group to which all these nationalists could join, so they are left in limbo with nowhere to go.
England First Party, Stoke Division would just like to let you nationalists know that there is a home for you here with us, if you so desire.
Text or call. Mobile No. 07955 142653, or e-mail us at efpstoke@gmail.com
Thursday, 7 October 2010
Why immigration isn't stopping.
I just want to step outside of local politics just for this blog, because there are facts you need to know that the government are keeping from you, and it is directly affecting our communities here in Stoke-on-Trent.
The United Nations has a set of written rules concerning immigration, it's called the "UNs declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples."
This is a set of rules that marks out clearly what the rights are of people in their own country, and when it comes to Britain, Article 8 of the declaration has special significance. This is the Article we could use to clear our country of this unwanted, and not voted for, mass immigration.
Here's Article 8, read this and see what I mean.
Article 8
1. Indigenous peoples and individuals have the right not to be subjected to forced assimilation or destruction of their culture.
2. States shall provide effective mechanisms for prevention of, and redress for:
(a) Any action which has the aim or effect of depriving them of their integrity as distinct peoples, or of their cultural values or ethnic identities;
(b) Any action which has the aim or effect of dispossessing them of their lands, territories or resources;
(c) Any form of forced population transfer which has the aim or effect of violating or undermining any of their rights;
(d) Any form of forced assimilation or integration;
(e) Any form of propaganda designed to promote or incite racial or ethnic discrimination directed against them.
All this crap you hear from the political parties about Britain having no indigenous people, just a bunch of mongrels, well, this is the reason why.
The government refuse to sign up to this declaration, because if they did, there would be hundreds of Brits all rushing to prosecute the government! If we signed up to this, all our immigration problems would be solved!
So what we have is the British government refusing to acknowledge that there are native British people, because if they did, their plans for knackering up this country would fall apart.
What we need to know now is if it legal for these lying, thieving scum to represent themselves as the British government, if no such place exists...................
I'm adding the entire document, take a look through.
Article 1
Indigenous peoples have the right to the full enjoyment, as a collective or as individuals, of all human rights and fundamental freedoms as recognized in the Charter of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights(4) and international human rights law.
Article 2
Indigenous peoples and individuals are free and equal to all other peoples and individuals and have the right to be free from any kind of discrimination, in the exercise of their rights, in particular that based on their indigenous origin or identity.
Article 3
Indigenous peoples have the right to self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.
Article 4
Indigenous peoples, in exercising their right to self-determination, have the right to autonomy or self-government in matters relating to their internal and local affairs, as well as ways and means for financing their autonomous functions.
Article 5
Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and strengthen their distinct political, legal, economic, social and cultural institutions, while retaining their right to participate fully, if they so choose, in the political, economic, social and cultural life of the State.
Article 6
Every indigenous individual has the right to a nationality.
Article 7
1. Indigenous individuals have the rights to life, physical and mental integrity, liberty and security of person.
2. Indigenous peoples have the collective right to live in freedom, peace and security as distinct peoples and shall not be subjected to any act of genocide or any other act of violence, including forcibly removing children of the group to another group.
Article 8
1. Indigenous peoples and individuals have the right not to be subjected to forced assimilation or destruction of their culture.
2. States shall provide effective mechanisms for prevention of, and redress for:
(a) Any action which has the aim or effect of depriving them of their integrity as distinct peoples, or of their cultural values or ethnic identities;
(b) Any action which has the aim or effect of dispossessing them of their lands, territories or resources;
(c) Any form of forced population transfer which has the aim or effect of violating or undermining any of their rights;
(d) Any form of forced assimilation or integration;
(e) Any form of propaganda designed to promote or incite racial or ethnic discrimination directed against them.
Article 9
Indigenous peoples and individuals have the right to belong to an indigenous community or nation, in accordance with the traditions and customs of the community or nation concerned. No discrimination of any kind may arise from the exercise of such a right.
Article 10
Indigenous peoples shall not be forcibly removed from their lands or territories. No relocation shall take place without the free, prior and informed consent of the indigenous peoples concerned and after agreement on just and fair compensation and, where possible, with the option of return.
Article 11
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to practise and revitalize their cultural traditions and customs. This includes the right to maintain, protect and develop the past, present and future manifestations of their cultures, such as archaeological and historical sites, artefacts, designs, ceremonies, technologies and visual and performing arts and literature.
2. States shall provide redress through effective mechanisms, which may include restitution, developed in conjunction with indigenous peoples, with respect to their cultural, intellectual, religious and spiritual property taken without their free, prior and informed consent or in violation of their laws, traditions and customs.
Article 12
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to manifest, practise, develop and teach their spiritual and religious traditions, customs and ceremonies; the right to maintain, protect, and have access in privacy to their religious and cultural sites; the right to the use and control of their ceremonial objects; and the right to the repatriation of their human remains.
2. States shall seek to enable the access and/or repatriation of ceremonial objects and human remains in their possession through fair, transparent and effective mechanisms developed in conjunction with indigenous peoples concerned.
Article 13
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to revitalize, use, develop and transmit to future generations their histories, languages, oral traditions, philosophies, writing systems and literatures, and to designate and retain their own names for communities, places and persons.
2. States shall take effective measures to ensure that this right is protected and also to ensure that indigenous peoples can understand and be understood in political, legal and administrative proceedings, where necessary through the provision of interpretation or by other appropriate means.
Article 14
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to establish and control their educational systems and institutions providing education in their own languages, in a manner appropriate to their cultural methods of teaching and learning.
2. Indigenous individuals, particularly children, have the right to all levels and forms of education of the State without discrimination.
3. States shall, in conjunction with indigenous peoples, take effective measures, in order for indigenous individuals, particularly children, including those living outside their communities, to have access, when possible, to an education in their own culture and provided in their own language.
Article 15
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to the dignity and diversity of their cultures, traditions, histories and aspirations which shall be appropriately reflected in education and public information.
2. States shall take effective measures, in consultation and cooperation with the indigenous peoples concerned, to combat prejudice and eliminate discrimination and to promote tolerance, understanding and good relations among indigenous peoples and all other segments of society.
Article 16
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to establish their own media in their own languages and to have access to all forms of non-indigenous media without discrimination.
2. States shall take effective measures to ensure that State-owned media duly reflect indigenous cultural diversity. States, without prejudice to ensuring full freedom of expression, should encourage privately owned media to adequately reflect indigenous cultural diversity.
Article 17
1. Indigenous individuals and peoples have the right to enjoy fully all rights established under applicable international and domestic labour law.
2. States shall in consultation and cooperation with indigenous peoples take specific measures to protect indigenous children from economic exploitation and from performing any work that is likely to be hazardous or to interfere with the child’s education, or to be harmful to the child’s health or physical, mental, spiritual, moral or social development, taking into account their special vulnerability and the importance of education for their empowerment.
3. Indigenous individuals have the right not to be subjected to any discriminatory conditions of labour and, inter alia, employment or salary.
Article 18
Indigenous peoples have the right to participate in decision-making in matters which would affect their rights, through representatives chosen by themselves in accordance with their own procedures, as well as to maintain and develop their own indigenous decision-making institutions.
Article 19
States shall consult and cooperate in good faith with the indigenous peoples concerned through their own representative institutions in order to obtain their free, prior and informed consent before adopting and implementing legislative or administrative measures that may affect them.
Article 20
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and develop their political, economic and social systems or institutions, to be secure in the enjoyment of their own means of subsistence and development, and to engage freely in all their traditional and other economic activities.
2. Indigenous peoples deprived of their means of subsistence and development are entitled to just and fair redress.
Article 21
1. Indigenous peoples have the right, without discrimination, to the improvement of their economic and social conditions, including, inter alia, in the areas of education, employment, vocational training and retraining, housing, sanitation, health and social security.
2. States shall take effective measures and, where appropriate, special measures to ensure continuing improvement of their economic and social conditions. Particular attention shall be paid to the rights and special needs of indigenous elders, women, youth, children and persons with disabilities.
Article 22
1. Particular attention shall be paid to the rights and special needs of indigenous elders, women, youth, children and persons with disabilities in the implementation of this Declaration.
2. States shall take measures, in conjunction with indigenous peoples, to ensure that indigenous women and children enjoy the full protection and guarantees against all forms of violence and discrimination.
Article 23
Indigenous peoples have the right to determine and develop priorities and strategies for exercising their right to development. In particular, indigenous peoples have the right to be actively involved in developing and determining health, housing and other economic and social programmes affecting them and, as far as possible, to administer such programmes through their own institutions.
Article 24
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to their traditional medicines and to maintain their health practices, including the conservation of their vital medicinal plants, animals and minerals. Indigenous individuals also have the right to access, without any discrimination, to all social and health services.
2. Indigenous individuals have an equal right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. States shall take the necessary steps with a view to achieving progressively the full realization of this right.
Article 25
Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and strengthen their distinctive spiritual relationship with their traditionally owned or otherwise occupied and used lands, territories, waters and coastal seas and other resources and to uphold their responsibilities to future generations in this regard.
Article 26
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to the lands, territories and resources which they have traditionally owned, occupied or otherwise used or acquired.
2. Indigenous peoples have the right to own, use, develop and control the lands, territories and resources that they possess by reason of traditional ownership or other traditional occupation or use, as well as those which they have otherwise acquired.
3. States shall give legal recognition and protection to these lands, territories and resources. Such recognition shall be conducted with due respect to the customs, traditions and land tenure systems of the indigenous peoples concerned.
Article 27
States shall establish and implement, in conjunction with indigenous peoples concerned, a fair, independent, impartial, open and transparent process, giving due recognition to indigenous peoples’ laws, traditions, customs and land tenure systems, to recognize and adjudicate the rights of indigenous peoples pertaining to their lands, territories and resources, including those which were traditionally owned or otherwise occupied or used. Indigenous peoples shall have the right to participate in this process.
Article 28
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to redress, by means that can include restitution or, when this is not possible, just, fair and equitable compensation, for the lands, territories and resources which they have traditionally owned or otherwise occupied or used, and which have been confiscated, taken, occupied, used or damaged without their free, prior and informed consent.
2. Unless otherwise freely agreed upon by the peoples concerned, compensation shall take the form of lands, territories and resources equal in quality, size and legal status or of monetary compensation or other appropriate redress.
Article 29
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to the conservation and protection of the environment and the productive capacity of their lands or territories and resources. States shall establish and implement assistance programmes for indigenous peoples for such conservation and protection, without discrimination.
2. States shall take effective measures to ensure that no storage or disposal of hazardous materials shall take place in the lands or territories of indigenous peoples without their free, prior and informed consent.
3. States shall also take effective measures to ensure, as needed, that programmes for monitoring, maintaining and restoring the health of indigenous peoples, as developed and implemented by the peoples affected by such materials, are duly implemented.
Article 30
1. Military activities shall not take place in the lands or territories of indigenous peoples, unless justified by a relevant public interest or otherwise freely agreed with or requested by the indigenous peoples concerned.
2. States shall undertake effective consultations with the indigenous peoples concerned, through appropriate procedures and in particular through their representative institutions, prior to using their lands or territories for military activities.
Article 31
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain, control, protect and develop their cultural heritage, traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions, as well as the manifestations of their sciences, technologies and cultures, including human and genetic resources, seeds, medicines, knowledge of the properties of fauna and flora, oral traditions, literatures, designs, sports and traditional games and visual and performing arts. They also have the right to maintain, control, protect and develop their intellectual property over such cultural heritage, traditional knowledge, and traditional cultural expressions.
2. In conjunction with indigenous peoples, States shall take effective measures to recognize and protect the exercise of these rights.
Article 32
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to determine and develop priorities and strategies for the development or use of their lands or territories and other resources.
2. States shall consult and cooperate in good faith with the indigenous peoples concerned through their own representative institutions in order to obtain their free and informed consent prior to the approval of any project affecting their lands or territories and other resources, particularly in connection with the development, utilization or exploitation of mineral, water or other resources.
3. States shall provide effective mechanisms for just and fair redress for any such activities, and appropriate measures shall be taken to mitigate adverse environmental, economic, social, cultural or spiritual impact.
Article 33
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to determine their own identity or membership in accordance with their customs and traditions. This does not impair the right of indigenous individuals to obtain citizenship of the States in which they live.
2. Indigenous peoples have the right to determine the structures and to select the membership of their institutions in accordance with their own procedures.
Article 34
Indigenous peoples have the right to promote, develop and maintain their institutional structures and their distinctive customs, spirituality, traditions, procedures, practices and, in the cases where they exist, juridical systems or customs, in accordance with international human rights standards.
Article 35
Indigenous peoples have the right to determine the responsibilities of individuals to their communities.
Article 36
1. Indigenous peoples, in particular those divided by international borders, have the right to maintain and develop contacts, relations and cooperation, including activities for spiritual, cultural, political, economic and social purposes, with their own members as well as other peoples across borders.
2. States, in consultation and cooperation with indigenous peoples, shall take effective measures to facilitate the exercise and ensure the implementation of this right.
Article 37
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to the recognition, observance and enforcement of treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements concluded with States or their successors and to have States honour and respect such treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements.
2. Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as diminishing or eliminating the rights of indigenous peoples contained in treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements.
Article 38
States in consultation and cooperation with indigenous peoples, shall take the appropriate measures, including legislative measures, to achieve the ends of this Declaration.
Article 39
Indigenous peoples have the right to have access to financial and technical assistance from States and through international cooperation, for the enjoyment of the rights contained in this Declaration.
Article 40
Indigenous peoples have the right to access to and prompt decision through just and fair procedures for the resolution of conflicts and disputes with States or other parties, as well as to effective remedies for all infringements of their individual and collective rights. Such a decision shall give due consideration to the customs, traditions, rules and legal systems of the indigenous peoples concerned and international human rights.
Article 41
The organs and specialized agencies of the United Nations system and other intergovernmental organizations shall contribute to the full realization of the provisions of this Declaration through the mobilization, inter alia, of financial cooperation and technical assistance. Ways and means of ensuring participation of indigenous peoples on issues affecting them shall be established.
Article 42
The United Nations, its bodies, including the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, and specialized agencies, including at the country level, and States shall promote respect for and full application of the provisions of this Declaration and follow up the effectiveness of this Declaration.
Article 43
The rights recognized herein constitute the minimum standards for the survival, dignity and well-being of the indigenous peoples of the world.
Article 44
All the rights and freedoms recognized herein are equally guaranteed to male and female indigenous individuals.
Article 45
Nothing in this Declaration may be construed as diminishing or extinguishing the rights indigenous peoples have now or may acquire in the future.
Article 46
1. Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, people, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act contrary to the Charter of the United Nations or construed as authorizing or encouraging any action which would dismember or impair, totally or in part, the territorial integrity or political unity of sovereign and independent States.
2. In the exercise of the rights enunciated in the present Declaration, human rights and fundamental freedoms of all shall be respected. The exercise of the rights set forth in this Declaration shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law and in accordance with international human rights obligations. Any such limitations shall be non-discriminatory and strictly necessary solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and for meeting the just and most compelling requirements of a democratic society.
3. The provisions set forth in this Declaration shall be interpreted in accordance with the principles of justice, democracy, respect for human rights, equality, non-discrimination, good governance and good faith.
The United Nations has a set of written rules concerning immigration, it's called the "UNs declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples."
This is a set of rules that marks out clearly what the rights are of people in their own country, and when it comes to Britain, Article 8 of the declaration has special significance. This is the Article we could use to clear our country of this unwanted, and not voted for, mass immigration.
Here's Article 8, read this and see what I mean.
Article 8
1. Indigenous peoples and individuals have the right not to be subjected to forced assimilation or destruction of their culture.
2. States shall provide effective mechanisms for prevention of, and redress for:
(a) Any action which has the aim or effect of depriving them of their integrity as distinct peoples, or of their cultural values or ethnic identities;
(b) Any action which has the aim or effect of dispossessing them of their lands, territories or resources;
(c) Any form of forced population transfer which has the aim or effect of violating or undermining any of their rights;
(d) Any form of forced assimilation or integration;
(e) Any form of propaganda designed to promote or incite racial or ethnic discrimination directed against them.
All this crap you hear from the political parties about Britain having no indigenous people, just a bunch of mongrels, well, this is the reason why.
The government refuse to sign up to this declaration, because if they did, there would be hundreds of Brits all rushing to prosecute the government! If we signed up to this, all our immigration problems would be solved!
So what we have is the British government refusing to acknowledge that there are native British people, because if they did, their plans for knackering up this country would fall apart.
What we need to know now is if it legal for these lying, thieving scum to represent themselves as the British government, if no such place exists...................
I'm adding the entire document, take a look through.
Article 1
Indigenous peoples have the right to the full enjoyment, as a collective or as individuals, of all human rights and fundamental freedoms as recognized in the Charter of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights(4) and international human rights law.
Article 2
Indigenous peoples and individuals are free and equal to all other peoples and individuals and have the right to be free from any kind of discrimination, in the exercise of their rights, in particular that based on their indigenous origin or identity.
Article 3
Indigenous peoples have the right to self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.
Article 4
Indigenous peoples, in exercising their right to self-determination, have the right to autonomy or self-government in matters relating to their internal and local affairs, as well as ways and means for financing their autonomous functions.
Article 5
Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and strengthen their distinct political, legal, economic, social and cultural institutions, while retaining their right to participate fully, if they so choose, in the political, economic, social and cultural life of the State.
Article 6
Every indigenous individual has the right to a nationality.
Article 7
1. Indigenous individuals have the rights to life, physical and mental integrity, liberty and security of person.
2. Indigenous peoples have the collective right to live in freedom, peace and security as distinct peoples and shall not be subjected to any act of genocide or any other act of violence, including forcibly removing children of the group to another group.
Article 8
1. Indigenous peoples and individuals have the right not to be subjected to forced assimilation or destruction of their culture.
2. States shall provide effective mechanisms for prevention of, and redress for:
(a) Any action which has the aim or effect of depriving them of their integrity as distinct peoples, or of their cultural values or ethnic identities;
(b) Any action which has the aim or effect of dispossessing them of their lands, territories or resources;
(c) Any form of forced population transfer which has the aim or effect of violating or undermining any of their rights;
(d) Any form of forced assimilation or integration;
(e) Any form of propaganda designed to promote or incite racial or ethnic discrimination directed against them.
Article 9
Indigenous peoples and individuals have the right to belong to an indigenous community or nation, in accordance with the traditions and customs of the community or nation concerned. No discrimination of any kind may arise from the exercise of such a right.
Article 10
Indigenous peoples shall not be forcibly removed from their lands or territories. No relocation shall take place without the free, prior and informed consent of the indigenous peoples concerned and after agreement on just and fair compensation and, where possible, with the option of return.
Article 11
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to practise and revitalize their cultural traditions and customs. This includes the right to maintain, protect and develop the past, present and future manifestations of their cultures, such as archaeological and historical sites, artefacts, designs, ceremonies, technologies and visual and performing arts and literature.
2. States shall provide redress through effective mechanisms, which may include restitution, developed in conjunction with indigenous peoples, with respect to their cultural, intellectual, religious and spiritual property taken without their free, prior and informed consent or in violation of their laws, traditions and customs.
Article 12
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to manifest, practise, develop and teach their spiritual and religious traditions, customs and ceremonies; the right to maintain, protect, and have access in privacy to their religious and cultural sites; the right to the use and control of their ceremonial objects; and the right to the repatriation of their human remains.
2. States shall seek to enable the access and/or repatriation of ceremonial objects and human remains in their possession through fair, transparent and effective mechanisms developed in conjunction with indigenous peoples concerned.
Article 13
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to revitalize, use, develop and transmit to future generations their histories, languages, oral traditions, philosophies, writing systems and literatures, and to designate and retain their own names for communities, places and persons.
2. States shall take effective measures to ensure that this right is protected and also to ensure that indigenous peoples can understand and be understood in political, legal and administrative proceedings, where necessary through the provision of interpretation or by other appropriate means.
Article 14
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to establish and control their educational systems and institutions providing education in their own languages, in a manner appropriate to their cultural methods of teaching and learning.
2. Indigenous individuals, particularly children, have the right to all levels and forms of education of the State without discrimination.
3. States shall, in conjunction with indigenous peoples, take effective measures, in order for indigenous individuals, particularly children, including those living outside their communities, to have access, when possible, to an education in their own culture and provided in their own language.
Article 15
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to the dignity and diversity of their cultures, traditions, histories and aspirations which shall be appropriately reflected in education and public information.
2. States shall take effective measures, in consultation and cooperation with the indigenous peoples concerned, to combat prejudice and eliminate discrimination and to promote tolerance, understanding and good relations among indigenous peoples and all other segments of society.
Article 16
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to establish their own media in their own languages and to have access to all forms of non-indigenous media without discrimination.
2. States shall take effective measures to ensure that State-owned media duly reflect indigenous cultural diversity. States, without prejudice to ensuring full freedom of expression, should encourage privately owned media to adequately reflect indigenous cultural diversity.
Article 17
1. Indigenous individuals and peoples have the right to enjoy fully all rights established under applicable international and domestic labour law.
2. States shall in consultation and cooperation with indigenous peoples take specific measures to protect indigenous children from economic exploitation and from performing any work that is likely to be hazardous or to interfere with the child’s education, or to be harmful to the child’s health or physical, mental, spiritual, moral or social development, taking into account their special vulnerability and the importance of education for their empowerment.
3. Indigenous individuals have the right not to be subjected to any discriminatory conditions of labour and, inter alia, employment or salary.
Article 18
Indigenous peoples have the right to participate in decision-making in matters which would affect their rights, through representatives chosen by themselves in accordance with their own procedures, as well as to maintain and develop their own indigenous decision-making institutions.
Article 19
States shall consult and cooperate in good faith with the indigenous peoples concerned through their own representative institutions in order to obtain their free, prior and informed consent before adopting and implementing legislative or administrative measures that may affect them.
Article 20
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and develop their political, economic and social systems or institutions, to be secure in the enjoyment of their own means of subsistence and development, and to engage freely in all their traditional and other economic activities.
2. Indigenous peoples deprived of their means of subsistence and development are entitled to just and fair redress.
Article 21
1. Indigenous peoples have the right, without discrimination, to the improvement of their economic and social conditions, including, inter alia, in the areas of education, employment, vocational training and retraining, housing, sanitation, health and social security.
2. States shall take effective measures and, where appropriate, special measures to ensure continuing improvement of their economic and social conditions. Particular attention shall be paid to the rights and special needs of indigenous elders, women, youth, children and persons with disabilities.
Article 22
1. Particular attention shall be paid to the rights and special needs of indigenous elders, women, youth, children and persons with disabilities in the implementation of this Declaration.
2. States shall take measures, in conjunction with indigenous peoples, to ensure that indigenous women and children enjoy the full protection and guarantees against all forms of violence and discrimination.
Article 23
Indigenous peoples have the right to determine and develop priorities and strategies for exercising their right to development. In particular, indigenous peoples have the right to be actively involved in developing and determining health, housing and other economic and social programmes affecting them and, as far as possible, to administer such programmes through their own institutions.
Article 24
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to their traditional medicines and to maintain their health practices, including the conservation of their vital medicinal plants, animals and minerals. Indigenous individuals also have the right to access, without any discrimination, to all social and health services.
2. Indigenous individuals have an equal right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. States shall take the necessary steps with a view to achieving progressively the full realization of this right.
Article 25
Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and strengthen their distinctive spiritual relationship with their traditionally owned or otherwise occupied and used lands, territories, waters and coastal seas and other resources and to uphold their responsibilities to future generations in this regard.
Article 26
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to the lands, territories and resources which they have traditionally owned, occupied or otherwise used or acquired.
2. Indigenous peoples have the right to own, use, develop and control the lands, territories and resources that they possess by reason of traditional ownership or other traditional occupation or use, as well as those which they have otherwise acquired.
3. States shall give legal recognition and protection to these lands, territories and resources. Such recognition shall be conducted with due respect to the customs, traditions and land tenure systems of the indigenous peoples concerned.
Article 27
States shall establish and implement, in conjunction with indigenous peoples concerned, a fair, independent, impartial, open and transparent process, giving due recognition to indigenous peoples’ laws, traditions, customs and land tenure systems, to recognize and adjudicate the rights of indigenous peoples pertaining to their lands, territories and resources, including those which were traditionally owned or otherwise occupied or used. Indigenous peoples shall have the right to participate in this process.
Article 28
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to redress, by means that can include restitution or, when this is not possible, just, fair and equitable compensation, for the lands, territories and resources which they have traditionally owned or otherwise occupied or used, and which have been confiscated, taken, occupied, used or damaged without their free, prior and informed consent.
2. Unless otherwise freely agreed upon by the peoples concerned, compensation shall take the form of lands, territories and resources equal in quality, size and legal status or of monetary compensation or other appropriate redress.
Article 29
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to the conservation and protection of the environment and the productive capacity of their lands or territories and resources. States shall establish and implement assistance programmes for indigenous peoples for such conservation and protection, without discrimination.
2. States shall take effective measures to ensure that no storage or disposal of hazardous materials shall take place in the lands or territories of indigenous peoples without their free, prior and informed consent.
3. States shall also take effective measures to ensure, as needed, that programmes for monitoring, maintaining and restoring the health of indigenous peoples, as developed and implemented by the peoples affected by such materials, are duly implemented.
Article 30
1. Military activities shall not take place in the lands or territories of indigenous peoples, unless justified by a relevant public interest or otherwise freely agreed with or requested by the indigenous peoples concerned.
2. States shall undertake effective consultations with the indigenous peoples concerned, through appropriate procedures and in particular through their representative institutions, prior to using their lands or territories for military activities.
Article 31
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain, control, protect and develop their cultural heritage, traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions, as well as the manifestations of their sciences, technologies and cultures, including human and genetic resources, seeds, medicines, knowledge of the properties of fauna and flora, oral traditions, literatures, designs, sports and traditional games and visual and performing arts. They also have the right to maintain, control, protect and develop their intellectual property over such cultural heritage, traditional knowledge, and traditional cultural expressions.
2. In conjunction with indigenous peoples, States shall take effective measures to recognize and protect the exercise of these rights.
Article 32
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to determine and develop priorities and strategies for the development or use of their lands or territories and other resources.
2. States shall consult and cooperate in good faith with the indigenous peoples concerned through their own representative institutions in order to obtain their free and informed consent prior to the approval of any project affecting their lands or territories and other resources, particularly in connection with the development, utilization or exploitation of mineral, water or other resources.
3. States shall provide effective mechanisms for just and fair redress for any such activities, and appropriate measures shall be taken to mitigate adverse environmental, economic, social, cultural or spiritual impact.
Article 33
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to determine their own identity or membership in accordance with their customs and traditions. This does not impair the right of indigenous individuals to obtain citizenship of the States in which they live.
2. Indigenous peoples have the right to determine the structures and to select the membership of their institutions in accordance with their own procedures.
Article 34
Indigenous peoples have the right to promote, develop and maintain their institutional structures and their distinctive customs, spirituality, traditions, procedures, practices and, in the cases where they exist, juridical systems or customs, in accordance with international human rights standards.
Article 35
Indigenous peoples have the right to determine the responsibilities of individuals to their communities.
Article 36
1. Indigenous peoples, in particular those divided by international borders, have the right to maintain and develop contacts, relations and cooperation, including activities for spiritual, cultural, political, economic and social purposes, with their own members as well as other peoples across borders.
2. States, in consultation and cooperation with indigenous peoples, shall take effective measures to facilitate the exercise and ensure the implementation of this right.
Article 37
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to the recognition, observance and enforcement of treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements concluded with States or their successors and to have States honour and respect such treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements.
2. Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as diminishing or eliminating the rights of indigenous peoples contained in treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements.
Article 38
States in consultation and cooperation with indigenous peoples, shall take the appropriate measures, including legislative measures, to achieve the ends of this Declaration.
Article 39
Indigenous peoples have the right to have access to financial and technical assistance from States and through international cooperation, for the enjoyment of the rights contained in this Declaration.
Article 40
Indigenous peoples have the right to access to and prompt decision through just and fair procedures for the resolution of conflicts and disputes with States or other parties, as well as to effective remedies for all infringements of their individual and collective rights. Such a decision shall give due consideration to the customs, traditions, rules and legal systems of the indigenous peoples concerned and international human rights.
Article 41
The organs and specialized agencies of the United Nations system and other intergovernmental organizations shall contribute to the full realization of the provisions of this Declaration through the mobilization, inter alia, of financial cooperation and technical assistance. Ways and means of ensuring participation of indigenous peoples on issues affecting them shall be established.
Article 42
The United Nations, its bodies, including the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, and specialized agencies, including at the country level, and States shall promote respect for and full application of the provisions of this Declaration and follow up the effectiveness of this Declaration.
Article 43
The rights recognized herein constitute the minimum standards for the survival, dignity and well-being of the indigenous peoples of the world.
Article 44
All the rights and freedoms recognized herein are equally guaranteed to male and female indigenous individuals.
Article 45
Nothing in this Declaration may be construed as diminishing or extinguishing the rights indigenous peoples have now or may acquire in the future.
Article 46
1. Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, people, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act contrary to the Charter of the United Nations or construed as authorizing or encouraging any action which would dismember or impair, totally or in part, the territorial integrity or political unity of sovereign and independent States.
2. In the exercise of the rights enunciated in the present Declaration, human rights and fundamental freedoms of all shall be respected. The exercise of the rights set forth in this Declaration shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law and in accordance with international human rights obligations. Any such limitations shall be non-discriminatory and strictly necessary solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and for meeting the just and most compelling requirements of a democratic society.
3. The provisions set forth in this Declaration shall be interpreted in accordance with the principles of justice, democracy, respect for human rights, equality, non-discrimination, good governance and good faith.
Wednesday, 6 October 2010
Immigrants, drug dealers, pikeys,paedophiles. These are the people who get housed first!
There is a 12,000 long waiting list for council houses in the city of Stoke-on-Trent, so how come the city council only seem to house immigrants, drug dealers, pikeys, and paedophiles?
There isn't a council estate that isn't in the process of being ravaged by scum, so why are the city council inflicting this on us? As we have a duty to uphold the tenancy agreement, surely the city council have a duty to the decent, law abiding council tenants?
It would appear not.
England First Party Stoke-on-Trent Division would like to see a local lettings policy, and for Residents Associations to be given the right to veto the housing of certain people within their area. Why the city council feel the need to house some of the scum that we get foisted on us, God only knows, but it isn't good enough.
With 12,000 people to choose from, how about giving us some decent, non-criminal sorts as neighbours, there have to be plenty on the list, and whilst you're at it, tighten up the rules for private landlords. There is no point evicting some oik, just to have a private landlord rent them a house round the corner from where they were just evicted!
We would also want to see the city council use all available powers to make sure that they were not housing scum in amongst us, and to this end we believe that there should be a set of written rules to which the city council has to follow, starting with their right to check with the police for recent criminal activity.
The way this should go is as follows; if a prospective council tenant has form for violence, drug use or dealing, paedophilia (within the past 5 years), or is an immigrant, then they should be refused the right to a council property, and instead should be made to take private accomodation. Council tenants that house such people should have their tenancies terminated, and not be re-housed by the city council for a fixed period
All it would take would be a few simple rules like these to cure our council estates of the runaway counts of ant-social behaviour, something that would favour the residents and the city council, and something that would build stronger communities.
There isn't a council estate that isn't in the process of being ravaged by scum, so why are the city council inflicting this on us? As we have a duty to uphold the tenancy agreement, surely the city council have a duty to the decent, law abiding council tenants?
It would appear not.
England First Party Stoke-on-Trent Division would like to see a local lettings policy, and for Residents Associations to be given the right to veto the housing of certain people within their area. Why the city council feel the need to house some of the scum that we get foisted on us, God only knows, but it isn't good enough.
With 12,000 people to choose from, how about giving us some decent, non-criminal sorts as neighbours, there have to be plenty on the list, and whilst you're at it, tighten up the rules for private landlords. There is no point evicting some oik, just to have a private landlord rent them a house round the corner from where they were just evicted!
We would also want to see the city council use all available powers to make sure that they were not housing scum in amongst us, and to this end we believe that there should be a set of written rules to which the city council has to follow, starting with their right to check with the police for recent criminal activity.
The way this should go is as follows; if a prospective council tenant has form for violence, drug use or dealing, paedophilia (within the past 5 years), or is an immigrant, then they should be refused the right to a council property, and instead should be made to take private accomodation. Council tenants that house such people should have their tenancies terminated, and not be re-housed by the city council for a fixed period
All it would take would be a few simple rules like these to cure our council estates of the runaway counts of ant-social behaviour, something that would favour the residents and the city council, and something that would build stronger communities.
Tuesday, 5 October 2010
How much?!
If Stoke-on-Trent city council would run its fleet vehicles on recycled veggie oil, we could save the best part of a £1 million per year, because the councils diesels bill for 12 months is £1,033,000!
Over £1 million a year just for diesel.
There is a company called Bio-Pod that sell a complete system for converting used veggie oil into clean, vehicle fuel, and for £175,000+vat, you can have a system that can refine 7.5 million litres per year.
Now if the city council would collect in all the waste veggie oil themselves, instead of giving to Biffa, the oil used could be refined at Cromer road, where there are already storage tanks.
Once you have the big lorries running on this recycled fuel( bin lorries, gritters), you can expand the recycling of all other materials because the cost of collection should drop massively. Collections should be free. The collection of timber, and timber based products like furniture, beds, etc, should be collected for free. This encourages people not to flytip, and gives the city council free fuel for the incinerator at Stoke.
There should be a paper recycling plant in the city as well.
The local market that would be available for taking paper is massive, what with schools, the police, the NHS, and the council itself.
There should also be facilities for the recycling of kerbstones, paving slabs, and house bricks from the numerous demolition sites around the city. I'm sure we could get cleaning up these items as part of community service, this too would save a lot of money.
There are masses of savings to be made without adversely affecting services, yet the city council refuse to take them up, instead, they prefer to spend money on brand new kerbs and flagstones when cleaned up recycled ones would do just as well.
It's your money they are wasting, it's up to you to make them spend your money in the most efficient way possible, remember this when it comes time to vote.
Over £1 million a year just for diesel.
There is a company called Bio-Pod that sell a complete system for converting used veggie oil into clean, vehicle fuel, and for £175,000+vat, you can have a system that can refine 7.5 million litres per year.
Now if the city council would collect in all the waste veggie oil themselves, instead of giving to Biffa, the oil used could be refined at Cromer road, where there are already storage tanks.
Once you have the big lorries running on this recycled fuel( bin lorries, gritters), you can expand the recycling of all other materials because the cost of collection should drop massively. Collections should be free. The collection of timber, and timber based products like furniture, beds, etc, should be collected for free. This encourages people not to flytip, and gives the city council free fuel for the incinerator at Stoke.
There should be a paper recycling plant in the city as well.
The local market that would be available for taking paper is massive, what with schools, the police, the NHS, and the council itself.
There should also be facilities for the recycling of kerbstones, paving slabs, and house bricks from the numerous demolition sites around the city. I'm sure we could get cleaning up these items as part of community service, this too would save a lot of money.
There are masses of savings to be made without adversely affecting services, yet the city council refuse to take them up, instead, they prefer to spend money on brand new kerbs and flagstones when cleaned up recycled ones would do just as well.
It's your money they are wasting, it's up to you to make them spend your money in the most efficient way possible, remember this when it comes time to vote.
Monday, 4 October 2010
Trouble in the rubble.
I said it yesterday, and I'll say it again today, the more you pay these morons the worse the service you get.
Once again these genius plotters and planners at Stoke-on-Trent city council have outdone themselves in the incompetent/stupidity category, demolishing half the bloody city without having contractors lined up to take the sites on. Now, they find themselves unable to carry on as the Homes and Communities Agency, Renew, and the other west midland based regen quangos, no longer have the funds available to complete, and it could be years before they do.
Once again Stoke-on-Trent city council have shown their utter inability to manage even the most straightforward of projects, and they leave the city with over 1300 less houses, but with a housing list of 12,000.
There are huge savings to be made in the city, so the council should now get its bloody finger out and start drawing in these savings. Some of the money to be had could then be used on building projects actually done by the city council through local contractors.
I've spoken to Phil Dawson from the councils neighbourhood renewal team a couple of times now, and shown him plans from a company called MapleTimberFrames, who design super efficient, pre constructed housing, who handed me plans for a pair of semis, water and wind tight, for £31,500.
This is the way forward, but you try getting it through to these morons at the top of the council food chain.
Of course, the real problem with this situation is that hundreds of Stoke-on-Trent residents are now going to have to live next to rubble strewn demolition sites that are going to attract fly tippers, rats, and kids, none of which are welcome neighbours.
If you own your own property, watch in despair as its value tumbles because that plot next door to you just became a magnet for kids and youths doing who knows what.
And what the hell are the councillors doing in these affected areas of the city? Why would they allow this demolition to go ahead without guarantees of funding, and the name of the construction company contracted to do the building?
I feel particularly sorry for the people of Middleport, who have been afflicted by this council insanity for so long now, and its clear that neither the council, or the councillors involved have no idea how to end this ongoing saga.
It is apparent that the systems used to run this city have to change, or this city will be no more, and that is something that will only happen by changing councillors at the next election.
The choice is yours, new ideas from people who love this city, or the same old destructive crap you've got now.
Once again these genius plotters and planners at Stoke-on-Trent city council have outdone themselves in the incompetent/stupidity category, demolishing half the bloody city without having contractors lined up to take the sites on. Now, they find themselves unable to carry on as the Homes and Communities Agency, Renew, and the other west midland based regen quangos, no longer have the funds available to complete, and it could be years before they do.
 |
| A familiar sight all over the city |
Once again Stoke-on-Trent city council have shown their utter inability to manage even the most straightforward of projects, and they leave the city with over 1300 less houses, but with a housing list of 12,000.
There are huge savings to be made in the city, so the council should now get its bloody finger out and start drawing in these savings. Some of the money to be had could then be used on building projects actually done by the city council through local contractors.
I've spoken to Phil Dawson from the councils neighbourhood renewal team a couple of times now, and shown him plans from a company called MapleTimberFrames, who design super efficient, pre constructed housing, who handed me plans for a pair of semis, water and wind tight, for £31,500.
This is the way forward, but you try getting it through to these morons at the top of the council food chain.
 |
| Fegg Hayes, still not demolished. |
Of course, the real problem with this situation is that hundreds of Stoke-on-Trent residents are now going to have to live next to rubble strewn demolition sites that are going to attract fly tippers, rats, and kids, none of which are welcome neighbours.
If you own your own property, watch in despair as its value tumbles because that plot next door to you just became a magnet for kids and youths doing who knows what.
And what the hell are the councillors doing in these affected areas of the city? Why would they allow this demolition to go ahead without guarantees of funding, and the name of the construction company contracted to do the building?
I feel particularly sorry for the people of Middleport, who have been afflicted by this council insanity for so long now, and its clear that neither the council, or the councillors involved have no idea how to end this ongoing saga.
It is apparent that the systems used to run this city have to change, or this city will be no more, and that is something that will only happen by changing councillors at the next election.
The choice is yours, new ideas from people who love this city, or the same old destructive crap you've got now.
Sunday, 3 October 2010
Limiting Council Officers salaries!
There's one rule that can be seen throughout life, and that is that in general, the more you pay the less you get!
That is certainly the case with the overpaid underachievers of our city council, people that drag huge sums of money from the public purse, but give very little in return.
The problem is that these greedy pigs expect private sector pay in public sector jobs, and that scenario just isn't sustainable. Stoke-on-Trent city councils new CEO was paid last year£169,000! This guy was brought in from Devon to fix the problems with thye city council, and do you know what his big idea was?
Bring in his consultant mates at a start cost of £400,000!
Why does he think he is being paid such an extortinate salary for?!
Take a look at the following figures for employees earning £50k or more, and what it costs the taxpayers of this city to fund this private sector lifestyle.
The following figures are the official council figures from the Statement of Accounts 05/06, and can be found on page 23.
.......................................Employees 05/06........Employees 04/05.
£50,000-£60,000.............................. 81.................51
£60,001-£70,000.............................. 23.................24
£70,001-£80,000.............................. 12..................9
£80,001-£90,000.............................. 6..................5
£90,001-£100,000............................. 2..................0
£100,001-£110,000............................ 0..................0
£110,001-£120,000............................ 0.................1
£120,001-£130,000............................ 2.................0
........................................Total; 126................90
So, in the space of 1 year, management numbers rose by 36! That's over 30%!
The next set of numbers are for the years 06/07 and 07/08.
..........................................Employees 07/08. Employees 06/07.
£50,000-£60,000................................ 116..........95
£60,001-£70,000................................ 23..........19
£70,001-£80,000................................ 17..........22
£80,001-£90,000................................ 8...........8
£90,001-£100,000............................... 3...........3
£100,001-£110,000.............................. 3..........0
£110,001-£120,000.............................. 1..........0
£120,001-£130,000.............................. 3..........1
£130,001-£140,000.............................. 0..........1
£140,001-£150,000.............................. 0..........0
£150,001-£160,000.............................. 1..........0
............................................Total; 175.........146
This last set of figures is for 08/09.
..........................................Employees 08/09.
£50,000-£60,000............................... 139
£60,001-£70,000............................... 49
£70,001-£80,000............................... 10
£80,001-£90,000............................... 11
£90,001-£100,000.............................. 8
£100,001-£110,000............................. 3
£110,001-£120,000............................. 0
£120,001-£130,000............................. 1
£130,001-£140,000............................. 0
£140,001-£150,000............................. 0
£150,001-£160,000............................. 0
£160,001-£170,000............................. 1 ........................................Total; 222
So there it is, in 4 years the number of pocketliners skinning the public purse rose from 90 to 222! That's an increase of 132, or nearly 150%!!
In the last year alone, there was a jump of 47, with those receiving £60k-£70k more than doubling from 23 to 49! At the lowest possible income of £60,000, that's an annual increase in the salary budget of £1,560,000. Over £1.5 million just in one pay sector!!
In the £50-£60k bracket, the extra 23 places cost the taxpayer another £1,150,000, in the £90-£100k sector, the extra 5 positions cost a minimum of £450,000. That's over £3 million in one year, and it doesn't include all the rises!
Public sector salaries should be halved, and in some cases thriced, to stop those taking these positions solely for the money.
There are lots of comparisons to make, and don't forget that these are the councils figures, all of which can be verified from the Statement of Account documents for 05/06, 06/07, 07/08, and 08/09.
Now, take a look at the costs.
04/05.
51 at £50k = £2,550,000.
24 at £60k = £1,140,000.
9 at £70k = £630,000.
5 at £80k = £400,000.
1 at £110k = £110,000.
The total for 04/05 is £5,130,000.
05/06.
81 at £50k = £4,050,000.
23 at £60k = £1,380,000.
12 at £70k = £840,000.
6 at £80k = £480,000.
2 at £90k = £180,000.
2 at £120k = £240,000.
The total for those getting £50k or more in 05/06 is £7,170,000.
06/07.
95 at £50k = £4,750,000.
19 at £60k = £1,140,000.
22 at £70k = £1,840,000.
8 at £80k = £640,000.
3 at £90k = £270,000.
1 at £120k = £120,000
1 at £130k = £130,000.
The total for 06/07 is an eyewatering £8,890,000.
07/08.
116 at £50k = £5,800,000.
23 at £60k = £1,380,000.
17 at £70k = £1,190,000.
8 at £80k = £640,000.
3 at 90k = £270,000.
3 at £100k = £300,000.
1 at £110k = £110,000.
3 at £120k = £360,000.
1 at £150k = £150,000.
The total for 07/08 is a massive £10,200,000.
08/09.
139 at £50k = £6,950,000.
49 at £60k = £2,940,000.
10 at £70k = £700,000.
11 at £80k = £880,000.
8 at £90k = £720,000.
3 at £100k = £300,000.
1 at £120k = £120,000.
1 at £160k = £160,000.
The total for 08/09 is a staggering £12,770,000.
Now remember that these figures are the MINIMUM FIGURES, without doubt, all of the totals here will be higher than noted.
In a five year span, the salary figure for those receiving £50,000 or more has jumped from just over £5 million, to an insane 12 and three quarter million!!!
With the figure added for 09/10, the total expenditure on salary payments for those getting £50k or more, now stands at £18,900,000.
You are being robbed blind, yet you vote in the same old rubbish at the local elections, rubbish that refuse to put a stop to this legalised thievery. You need to make changes, and you need to make them fast, before what money this city has is eaten up in obscene salaries, and gold plated pension payments.
You have been warned.......................
That is certainly the case with the overpaid underachievers of our city council, people that drag huge sums of money from the public purse, but give very little in return.
The problem is that these greedy pigs expect private sector pay in public sector jobs, and that scenario just isn't sustainable. Stoke-on-Trent city councils new CEO was paid last year£169,000! This guy was brought in from Devon to fix the problems with thye city council, and do you know what his big idea was?
Bring in his consultant mates at a start cost of £400,000!
Why does he think he is being paid such an extortinate salary for?!
Take a look at the following figures for employees earning £50k or more, and what it costs the taxpayers of this city to fund this private sector lifestyle.
The following figures are the official council figures from the Statement of Accounts 05/06, and can be found on page 23.
.......................................Employees 05/06........Employees 04/05.
£50,000-£60,000.............................. 81.................51
£60,001-£70,000.............................. 23.................24
£70,001-£80,000.............................. 12..................9
£80,001-£90,000.............................. 6..................5
£90,001-£100,000............................. 2..................0
£100,001-£110,000............................ 0..................0
£110,001-£120,000............................ 0.................1
£120,001-£130,000............................ 2.................0
........................................Total; 126................90
So, in the space of 1 year, management numbers rose by 36! That's over 30%!
The next set of numbers are for the years 06/07 and 07/08.
..........................................Employees 07/08. Employees 06/07.
£50,000-£60,000................................ 116..........95
£60,001-£70,000................................ 23..........19
£70,001-£80,000................................ 17..........22
£80,001-£90,000................................ 8...........8
£90,001-£100,000............................... 3...........3
£100,001-£110,000.............................. 3..........0
£110,001-£120,000.............................. 1..........0
£120,001-£130,000.............................. 3..........1
£130,001-£140,000.............................. 0..........1
£140,001-£150,000.............................. 0..........0
£150,001-£160,000.............................. 1..........0
............................................Total; 175.........146
This last set of figures is for 08/09.
..........................................Employees 08/09.
£50,000-£60,000............................... 139
£60,001-£70,000............................... 49
£70,001-£80,000............................... 10
£80,001-£90,000............................... 11
£90,001-£100,000.............................. 8
£100,001-£110,000............................. 3
£110,001-£120,000............................. 0
£120,001-£130,000............................. 1
£130,001-£140,000............................. 0
£140,001-£150,000............................. 0
£150,001-£160,000............................. 0
£160,001-£170,000............................. 1 ........................................Total; 222
So there it is, in 4 years the number of pocketliners skinning the public purse rose from 90 to 222! That's an increase of 132, or nearly 150%!!
In the last year alone, there was a jump of 47, with those receiving £60k-£70k more than doubling from 23 to 49! At the lowest possible income of £60,000, that's an annual increase in the salary budget of £1,560,000. Over £1.5 million just in one pay sector!!
In the £50-£60k bracket, the extra 23 places cost the taxpayer another £1,150,000, in the £90-£100k sector, the extra 5 positions cost a minimum of £450,000. That's over £3 million in one year, and it doesn't include all the rises!
Public sector salaries should be halved, and in some cases thriced, to stop those taking these positions solely for the money.
There are lots of comparisons to make, and don't forget that these are the councils figures, all of which can be verified from the Statement of Account documents for 05/06, 06/07, 07/08, and 08/09.
Now, take a look at the costs.
04/05.
51 at £50k = £2,550,000.
24 at £60k = £1,140,000.
9 at £70k = £630,000.
5 at £80k = £400,000.
1 at £110k = £110,000.
The total for 04/05 is £5,130,000.
05/06.
81 at £50k = £4,050,000.
23 at £60k = £1,380,000.
12 at £70k = £840,000.
6 at £80k = £480,000.
2 at £90k = £180,000.
2 at £120k = £240,000.
The total for those getting £50k or more in 05/06 is £7,170,000.
06/07.
95 at £50k = £4,750,000.
19 at £60k = £1,140,000.
22 at £70k = £1,840,000.
8 at £80k = £640,000.
3 at £90k = £270,000.
1 at £120k = £120,000
1 at £130k = £130,000.
The total for 06/07 is an eyewatering £8,890,000.
07/08.
116 at £50k = £5,800,000.
23 at £60k = £1,380,000.
17 at £70k = £1,190,000.
8 at £80k = £640,000.
3 at 90k = £270,000.
3 at £100k = £300,000.
1 at £110k = £110,000.
3 at £120k = £360,000.
1 at £150k = £150,000.
The total for 07/08 is a massive £10,200,000.
08/09.
139 at £50k = £6,950,000.
49 at £60k = £2,940,000.
10 at £70k = £700,000.
11 at £80k = £880,000.
8 at £90k = £720,000.
3 at £100k = £300,000.
1 at £120k = £120,000.
1 at £160k = £160,000.
The total for 08/09 is a staggering £12,770,000.
Now remember that these figures are the MINIMUM FIGURES, without doubt, all of the totals here will be higher than noted.
In a five year span, the salary figure for those receiving £50,000 or more has jumped from just over £5 million, to an insane 12 and three quarter million!!!
With the figure added for 09/10, the total expenditure on salary payments for those getting £50k or more, now stands at £18,900,000.
You are being robbed blind, yet you vote in the same old rubbish at the local elections, rubbish that refuse to put a stop to this legalised thievery. You need to make changes, and you need to make them fast, before what money this city has is eaten up in obscene salaries, and gold plated pension payments.
You have been warned.......................
Saturday, 2 October 2010
Making jobs and money for Stoke-on-Trent.
What this city needs is money invested in it that will create jobs for the people, and income for the city council.
"How the **** do we do that?" I hear you cry.
Simple.
Remember when the city council lost £5 million when the Icelandic bank, Landsbanksi collapsed?
That £5 million was only a little part of the cash sum the city council had invested in banks and building societies all round the world, in fact, the total was £92,784,000.00. Nearly £93million, that's a lot of money.
£13 million was what's known as "on call", meaning it was a very short term investment, sometimes just overnight, but the remaining £80 million was not ring fenced.
So, it was decided that overseas investment was too dangerous at that time to risk our money, so in their infinite wisdom, the morons of the finance department agreed to the investing of £50 million of your tax money with the Labour government. For a £50 million investment, Stoke-on-Trent gets about £30,000 in interest!
What a bloody waste of money!
Instead of sticking all this cash into an account where the government gets to keep the interest, why not invest the £50 million right here in the city?
Why not do something with it that would create local jobs, and give the city a long term income?
England First Party say that the money currently being used to fund the tosspots in Westminster should be used instead to build two, bio-mass plants, one in the north of the city, one in the south.
These plants produce energy from waste products, so grass cuttings, hedge trimmings, waste food, can all be used right here in the city to produce our own electricity.
This is the real potential. Two plants might support a hundred jobs, but producing enough electricity to cover nearly all of the city means we can do deals with a range of people in order to provide many more job opportunities.
For instance, we could say to businesses in the city, we'll sell you cheap electricity if you take on a dozen full time apprentices. Their electric bill gets halved, school leavers that don't want to continue in full time education would have the chance at a proper trade, something that would give them the skills for a successful future.
We could do something with business rates, if the council ran its own buildings with this electric- heating and lighting, just for the Civic Centre alone you'd be looking at savings around £1.5-£2 million a year.
The cost of two plants in 2005, when this was put forward to the city council, was £12.6 million each, so let's say that 5 years has seen the price rise to £18 million.
Two plants will cost you £36 million, and if each makes savings of £2 million per year, that's 9 years before we've paid them off. If each plant lasts 30 years, that's 21 years of producing energy thats pure profit apart from the running costs.
Stoke-on-Trent wold gain £2 million a year for 21 years, that's £42 million profit for the city!
With two plants, that would be £84 million for the city!
And doubtlss there would be a stack of different things we could do to kickstart the local economy so that our kids aren't hanging on the street corners with nothing to do, and to ensure that they have a shot at a decent future.
If you disagree, or you've thought of something that should be included, leave a comment, I'll reply to them all.
"How the **** do we do that?" I hear you cry.
Simple.
Remember when the city council lost £5 million when the Icelandic bank, Landsbanksi collapsed?
That £5 million was only a little part of the cash sum the city council had invested in banks and building societies all round the world, in fact, the total was £92,784,000.00. Nearly £93million, that's a lot of money.
£13 million was what's known as "on call", meaning it was a very short term investment, sometimes just overnight, but the remaining £80 million was not ring fenced.
So, it was decided that overseas investment was too dangerous at that time to risk our money, so in their infinite wisdom, the morons of the finance department agreed to the investing of £50 million of your tax money with the Labour government. For a £50 million investment, Stoke-on-Trent gets about £30,000 in interest!
What a bloody waste of money!
Instead of sticking all this cash into an account where the government gets to keep the interest, why not invest the £50 million right here in the city?
Why not do something with it that would create local jobs, and give the city a long term income?
England First Party say that the money currently being used to fund the tosspots in Westminster should be used instead to build two, bio-mass plants, one in the north of the city, one in the south.
These plants produce energy from waste products, so grass cuttings, hedge trimmings, waste food, can all be used right here in the city to produce our own electricity.
This is the real potential. Two plants might support a hundred jobs, but producing enough electricity to cover nearly all of the city means we can do deals with a range of people in order to provide many more job opportunities.
For instance, we could say to businesses in the city, we'll sell you cheap electricity if you take on a dozen full time apprentices. Their electric bill gets halved, school leavers that don't want to continue in full time education would have the chance at a proper trade, something that would give them the skills for a successful future.
We could do something with business rates, if the council ran its own buildings with this electric- heating and lighting, just for the Civic Centre alone you'd be looking at savings around £1.5-£2 million a year.
The cost of two plants in 2005, when this was put forward to the city council, was £12.6 million each, so let's say that 5 years has seen the price rise to £18 million.
Two plants will cost you £36 million, and if each makes savings of £2 million per year, that's 9 years before we've paid them off. If each plant lasts 30 years, that's 21 years of producing energy thats pure profit apart from the running costs.
Stoke-on-Trent wold gain £2 million a year for 21 years, that's £42 million profit for the city!
With two plants, that would be £84 million for the city!
And doubtlss there would be a stack of different things we could do to kickstart the local economy so that our kids aren't hanging on the street corners with nothing to do, and to ensure that they have a shot at a decent future.
If you disagree, or you've thought of something that should be included, leave a comment, I'll reply to them all.
Friday, 1 October 2010
New kid on the block.
For the past 60 years, Stoke-on-Trent has suffered the indignity of socialist rule, and if you look at the state of our city now, you can see what that 60 years has achieved.
As industries ran down and jobs were lost, Labour sat on its haunches and did nothing, and as trade barriers were dropped, and Britain became flooded with cheap imports, Labour sat on its haunches and did nothing.
When the steelworks went, and the pottery industry all but died, Labour sat on its haunches and still did nothing.
And so we arrive at today.
The city is stricken, bar a handful of companies scattered across the place, there is no manufacturing any longer, there are no jobs any longer. Promises of regeneration have proved time and again to be nothing but lies, as swathes of the city are demolished, but not renewed, the city looks worse than it did after WW2, yet given all this, Labour still get voted in, they are still sat on their haunches, and Stoke-on-Trents all but terminal decline into dereliction and decay, continues unabated.
It seems as though no-one in the city is happy with what is happening to the city, yet the people responsible for the decline of this area are still at the helm, and they are still steering us towards the rocks, the same faces,
the same names, the same arrogance and incompetence.
England First Party does exactly what it says on the tin, it puts the concerns of England and the English first, but saving Stoke-on-Trent isn't about national policies, it's about what we would do locally, it's about the policies that we would implement to make this city more successful and prosperous.
Over the coming weeks, we shall publish a list of the policies that we believe will help raise this city from the bottom of the heap where it has resided for far too long, because we know that Stoke-on-Trent can still be saved from the jaws of this Labour made destruction.
There is the chance of a successful future for this city, but it means breaking away from this socialist ideology that has wrecked what was once a thriving city economy, and turned it into a wasteland of demolition and council corruption.
IF THEY HAVEN'T GOT IT RIGHT AFTER 60 YEARS, THEY ARE NOT GOING TO GET IT RIGHT!
As industries ran down and jobs were lost, Labour sat on its haunches and did nothing, and as trade barriers were dropped, and Britain became flooded with cheap imports, Labour sat on its haunches and did nothing.
When the steelworks went, and the pottery industry all but died, Labour sat on its haunches and still did nothing.
And so we arrive at today.
The city is stricken, bar a handful of companies scattered across the place, there is no manufacturing any longer, there are no jobs any longer. Promises of regeneration have proved time and again to be nothing but lies, as swathes of the city are demolished, but not renewed, the city looks worse than it did after WW2, yet given all this, Labour still get voted in, they are still sat on their haunches, and Stoke-on-Trents all but terminal decline into dereliction and decay, continues unabated.
It seems as though no-one in the city is happy with what is happening to the city, yet the people responsible for the decline of this area are still at the helm, and they are still steering us towards the rocks, the same faces,
the same names, the same arrogance and incompetence.
England First Party does exactly what it says on the tin, it puts the concerns of England and the English first, but saving Stoke-on-Trent isn't about national policies, it's about what we would do locally, it's about the policies that we would implement to make this city more successful and prosperous.
Over the coming weeks, we shall publish a list of the policies that we believe will help raise this city from the bottom of the heap where it has resided for far too long, because we know that Stoke-on-Trent can still be saved from the jaws of this Labour made destruction.
There is the chance of a successful future for this city, but it means breaking away from this socialist ideology that has wrecked what was once a thriving city economy, and turned it into a wasteland of demolition and council corruption.
IF THEY HAVEN'T GOT IT RIGHT AFTER 60 YEARS, THEY ARE NOT GOING TO GET IT RIGHT!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)