Total Pageviews

Monday, 27 December 2010

Let's set the record straight!

  Councillor Mike Coleman has been telling members that I've been slagging off the BNP.
Not true.  I've been slagging off the leaders of the BNP, a small group of people that have brought the party into disrepute with their unacceptable finacially iffy behaviour, with Griffin in particular helping to cripple the party by running it into the most massive debt, debt that now stands at over £600,000.

  My sympathies lie with the members and activists of the party, the most selfless bunch of nationalists for the most, whose donations are abused, whose branch finances are taken without request or thanks, by the head office gits that seem determined on wrecking the BNP by not paying any of the bills that are due, but by wasting such funding that they have, on ridiculous court cases, brought by ex-employees who were unfairly dismissed, as this weeks court case proved when Griffin in his infinite stupidity, pushed ahead with a case that the other parties wanted to settle out of court to save the BNP the extra expense. Griffin said no, and then promptly lost the case, a case in which the final financial settlement will be close on £200,000, all of which will come out of membership money and members donations.

  His clownish and extremely damaging behaviour just before the general election, and his litigious stupidity in sacking and suspending a host of officers that disagreed with him, highlight the reason him and his yes men have to go, though the damage inflicted on the party is now so severe its becoming too much work to rescue the tatters of what's left.

  So the next time Mike Coleman says I'm slagging off the BNP, tell him to stop talking rubbish. My heart will always be with the genuine nationalists of this country, including those decent, hardworking ones of the BNP, but I will never refrain from criticism of those that masquerade as nationalists, but who inflict division and damage upon the movement, and Griffin most definitely falls into that category.


   contact us at;

Tuesday, 21 December 2010

Mr Griffin what have you done?!

  Against all advice, from members and officers alike, Nick Griffin chose to ignoresuch sensible options as settling out of court, and chose instead to crash headlong into the legal system with his fight against the ex-BNP members known as the Decembrists.

  His arrogance has cost the BNP dear, with the court ruling in the Decembrists favour, and awarding costs of £40k, with a total bill expected to be well over £100k, so all you BNP members had better ready yourselves for the avalanche of begging letters coming to  a letterbox near you!

These two articles fill in the gaps, with one from Eddy Butlers site, the other from the NorthWestNationalists.

Nick Griffin has been ordered to pay the sum of £45,000 toward costs within the next 28 days to the people who have become known as the 'December Rebels'. Steve Blake, Kenny Smith, Ian Dawson, and Nichola Smith.

The balance of the full sum which has not been set yet is likely to be around another  £40,000

More news:

The above does not include Nick Griffin's personal legal bill of around £30,000 which brings the total to £110,000 falling due within the next three months.

Please note:

This case did not involve Matt Single or Sadie Graham.

Decembrists win Court action against Griffin ?
News is spreading round the web that moneylover Nick Griffin has had costs awarded against him of over £40,000+ . Then there's the Court costs.
A sum of well over £100,000 + is highly likely to be the final sum for costs.
It's well known the BNP is skint due to the shambles that Griffin has made of the previously succesful BNP. But like all his other ventures, ex-bankrupt Griffin has again been involved in much financial chicanery to say the least over the last 11 years.
Where this amount of money will come from to pay these costs is limited and unknown. No doubt Griffin will try to pillage BNP monies nationwide. NWN advice is for BNP units to keep a 'safe hidey hole' where Griffin cannot get his grubby hands on their money. Keep accounts secret, so that he doesn't find out about any cash you may have.
Maybe this Court case is one reason that frequent parachutist Griffin, didn't parachute into Oldham once again, to stand in a Parliamentary by-election there. He knew he was going to lose you see.
 contact us at

Wednesday, 15 December 2010

Council cutbacks, and what you should be looking for.

  For the past two years through the Potteries Community Federation, and later with the England First Party, Stoke-on-Trent division, a group of us in this city have pushed to make certain financial irregularities public, in the hope that some of you would pick up on what we were showing you and try to pressure the city council into being honest about what it was doing with huge amounts of your money, but as usual, all we got was moaning and groaning about what was happening, but no bloody action.

  Well, you don't have a choice now, because if you don't take action against the crooked system of governance that this city is run by, you can kiss goodbye to the services the city council is supposed to provide as the entire setup comes crashing to the ground amidst a million pointing fingers, all claiming that it wasn't their fault, but the governments.

  One area of financial duplicity is what I'm going to take you through now, so please pay close attention, and I'll give you a demonstration of the city councils very iffy financial behaviour.

 The two documents above show what the city council had invested on your behalf, in cash, in 2007/08, and from then to 2009.
£92,784,000, just under £93 million of taxpayers cash kept in accounts so the city council could draw off the interest, which as the second document shows, was just a couple of million per year.

After the banks crashed, and the Icelandic bank Landsbanki in particular, the loss of £5 million of the money invested by the city council caused all kinds of strange financial behaviour, not least being the decisions as to what to do with the money from here on in.

Under the financial guidance of the biggest arsehole in British politics- Gormless Broon- decisions were made that smacked of corrupt practises.
There were at the time, limits as to how much money could be invested in one place at one time, this was circumvented by Head of Finance for the city council, Paul Simpson( or Homer, as we like to call him)

Of the £93 million invested, £13 million was on call- that means it was invested on the short term as it would be required in the near future, sometimes money like this would be invested overnight- so that reduced the amount to £80 million.
£43 million of this remaining cash was used to "pay bills", an e-mail I received from Hannah Quinn at the council answering a freedom of information request I had put in stated;

The £43m is a running down of cash balances which cannot be traced to individual items of spend as it is part of an overall strategy to fund either revenue or capital by cash (rather than, say, borrowing). It is not clear where the £43m has been derived from."

   The above statement should have you phoning the Audit Commission as you read, because it says that it is not clear where the money came from, or where it went to, but wherever that might be, rest assured it is untraceable!!
 When I asked the Assistant Head of Finance, Robert Thorley, about the £43 million that had been spent through the city councils current account, he refuted it was untraceable, but when I asked for a copy of the account statement so I could trace this money myself, I was informed by Mr Thorley that I was being 'unreasonable'.
Shortly after that, reasons were manufactured by the city council to stop me asking questions, and cut me off from freedom of information. 

    That leaves us with £37 million remaining from an original investment of £93 million. If we reduce the total by another £5 million to represent what was lost, that leaves £32 million which the city council invested with the governments DMO- debt management office.
For an investment of a least £32 million, the people of Stoke-on-Trent would become richer by the measly sum of £30,000, this being all the interest the city would get from this money, whilst the Labour government raked in millions.
  Questions asked about this investment were met with hostility and denial, of the three of us that submitted questions specific to this investment, none of us have had any answer from the city council other than, "investment? What investment? Don't know what you're talking about." 

  There is at least £32 million of the taxpayers money invested on behalf of the people of this city, of which they seem to have no knowledge, and funnily, almost the exact amount that the city council claims it needs to find.

It is high time that Sassi at the Sentinel, and all the other local media outlets, stopped protecting their Common Purpose/ masonic mates, and told the public the truth of just how incompetent the finances of this city are managed, not just big investments like this, but the S106 money from planning applications, money that has been taken for other purposes than those for which it was paid, and that is a direct breaking of the law.

  Stoke-on-Trent city council has become a boys club, with corruption and unacceptably unprofessional behaviour from the council management, behaviour that is readily embraced by far too many elected council officials in exchange for position and money.
Forget the political labels, let's clean this stinking mess up once and for all, and dump on their arses all of those that helped to support and sustain this corrupt and damaging system.

  contact us at; or text to 07955 142 653

Monday, 13 December 2010

Catching up.

Two bits of information relating to the BNP today, with the first being Mike Colemans failed attempt to get halal meat removed from being served in schools.
8 said remove it, 38 voted in support of it staying. We need a list of those 38 so as to ask their constituents if they agree with this appeasing, animal cruelty stand.

  The second is taken from Eddy Butlers blog, and is a comment left by a BNP insider. What they have to say could be crucial to the BNPs success in the upcoming May elections.

  News that BNP debts are down from £560k To £220k In 3 months is incredible, especially if it were true! The new party treasurer must be growing a nose to rival Jimmy Durante with porkie telling on this scale. Is Clive Jefferson deliberately lying to the Chairman and the party faithful or is he just so stupid he thinks he is telling the truth?

Just a snippet of the real debt mountain currently being pursued:
1) Gilbert Davies solicitors £50.000
2) Romac printers £40.000
3) Mark Collett £25.000
4) Michaela McKenzie (court) £25.000
5) Smith court case (court) £50.000
6) 6 suppliers (high court) £75.000
7) Royal mail (court) £60.000
8) Adlorries (Dowson) £150.000
9) NI contributions (HM government) £60.000
10) Small claims now registered £45.000
11) Current legal bills £30.000

This is not including the £50,000-£100,000 legal bill from the Equalities Commission case due any day now. This could push party debt to over £700,000. This would amount to nearly a million pounds - is Clive Jefferson on drugs? (Not including any recent small “under £5000” debt amounts, this could easily add on a further £30.000)

This is a true account of the full debts the party faces as at this time, December 2010. The claim that the party has cut running costs from £100,000 to £28,000 a month is nothing short of fraudulent or at best the babblings of a treasurer who is so completely incompetent as to risk the party’s future by his obvious lack of basic accounting knowledge and true party expenditure.

Nick Griffin will pay a heavy price for dishing out such ridiculous statements - did he ask Mr. Jefferson to substantiate these figures? Has the scrutiny committee seen any evidence to confirm this economic miracle of the decade? Does Jefferson own a calculator or are these miscalculations the result of him not being able to count his toes as well as his fingers?

I am sure the IMF will be head hunting Clive soon. If only the banking system had a money wizard like Jefferson we would have been spared this recession (or maybe they did)!

As someone once said ‘if you’re going to lie, tell a really big one’ the bigger the lie the more chance people will believe it. “We owe around £650,000 but we will tell the grunts it is only £220,000, who would believe we would dare to lie on such a gigantic scale?”

Clive should have thought this through because when all these start showing up in court papers his deceit or stupidity will be seen and I predict Jefferson will be looking for a job back on the doors again as a bouncer.

 Nick Griffin has to go, though many of us suspect it is already too late for the BNP to be revived to a point where it became electable. A great shame that one man can bugger up an entire movement.

contact us at;

Friday, 3 December 2010

Who would have targeted the mosque?

   Read the following brief article from tonights Sentinel, about an attack on a bloody big mosque here in Stoke-on-Trent.

sentinel Image: sentinel

Arsonists use gas pipe in plot to wreck Hanley mosque

ARSONISTS have targeted Hanley’s new mosque in a racist attack.
The offenders broke into a nearby building in Regent Road in Hanley and directed a gas pipe into the mosque at around 6.30am.
They smashed their way inside the mosque, taped the pipe across an alleyway and inside the building.
But the fire was put out before there was any explosion.
Chief Inspector Wayne Jones told The Sentinel at a press conference this afternoon: “The perpetrators tried to use gas from premises next door to damage the mosque."
He added: “At this stage we are treating this incident as a racist attack on a religious building.
“I am sure the community are as appalled at this behaviour as we are."
Buy The Sentinel tomorrow for the full story.

  There are a couple of points to be made here.
One, despite their lack of success, top marks should be awarded for originality.
Two, how can you have a racist attack on a religious building? These politically correct morons still haven't got the message that muslims are not a race, so attacks about them are not racist, they are religionist!

If the politicians will insist on withholding our rights to democracy, then people will take matters into their own hands, and bloody good on 'em!
  The two major policy problems with Britain are our enforced membership of the EU, and this unending flood of immigration, and the main similarity between them is the fact that the people of this country have been denied their right to have their say on whether or not this is what they want, so these lying, thieving deceitful gits that masquerade as leaders either give us our entitlement under the rules of democratic principles, or they can expect a lot more of this kind of behaviour, some of which will hopefully be targeted at them!

contact us at;

Tuesday, 30 November 2010

Now it's racist to register a dislike of halal!

Mike Coleman puts the complaints of parents to the council over their feeding of our children throughh the muslim practise of animal slaughter, and the bloody marxists pull their faces!
Yet we are by and large, a nation of animal lovers and deeply against cruelty to them, the powers that be by-pass the laws of this land so foreigners can torture animals to death in the persuance of their backward and barbaric religion.

   This favouring of foreigners over the indigenous people has to stop, this our country, and we have our own religion, culture, history and indentity, none of which need replacing, and in particular by these third world usurpers.
This was sent to me by a government employee, another example of how the native people of Britain are being screwed by the politicians, in favour of foreign scroungers, and refugees and asylum seekers that shouldn't even be here!

This is interesting!
Let me see if I understand all this ..........
Are you aware of the following?

The British Government provides the following financial assistance: -
Weekly allowance
Weekly Spouse allowance
Additional weekly hardship allowance


If I was a refugee, why would I look for work?

Please forward to all your contacts so that we can lobby for an increase in the aged pension.

After all, the average pensioner has paid taxes and contributed to the growth of this country
For the last 40 to 60 years.
   Our pensioners are constantly abused and degraded by the political establishment, being paid a pittance compared to what these foreigners get, and who haven't put a bloody thing into this country!
Our armed forces are equipped with inferior weapons and equipment, but there are billions of pounds to give away in the shape of foreign aid!

  Whether at local or national  level, this selling out of our own people in favour of foreigners with no loyalty to this country, and with their hands out for what they can get, should be totally uncceptable, so for Gods sake make a difference the next time you get a chance to cast your vote!

contact us at;

Monday, 29 November 2010

Another fine mess they're getting us into.

The city council asked for comments after declaring that the Pride in our city scheme, where dustin lorries make free collections on the estates of the city once or twice a year, are to be dropped in order to save £67,000 per year.

   Below is my e-mail to them, and the suggestions as to what they should be doing.
Read it, then feel free to add your own thoughts on the matter. I will add the e-mail address to write to.

   Once again, it is the stupidity and incompetence of Stoke-on-Trent's city council that becomes the first noticeable attribute on display.
  Instead of scrapping a scheme that has real impact across the city, why not give up your rights to free parking? This will save the city £700,000 per year!
  If you had listened to our proposals and started to run the bin lorries on veggie oil, it would cost next to nothing to run this scheme, in fact, you would be able to greatly extend it.
  It's always the same with you people when times are tough, you promise not to touch frontline services, yet the first place to get cuts is frontline services, you close down successful and efficient schemes like Pride in our City to save £67,000, but you waste £36,000 on the politically corrupt Common Purpose training!
  And the incompetence of the city councillors is highlighted perfectly by Terry Follows mewlings about discretionary services. Why don't you vote in a CEO that doesn't cost the city £200,000 a year?
Better still, why don't you councillors trim the fat from the £50k and over pay bracket that costs the taxpayers nearly £19 million per year!!!
  The savings are there to be made so that sensible, working schemes like Pride in our city can be kept from cuts by you bloody council idiots that seem to be intent on cutting everything possible that doesn't affect yourselves!
  There is no need for cutting programmes like this because there is plenty of room for cost cutting and savings. Unfortunately, the city council appears to be headed by self-centred, selfish money grabbers, who have no real interest in what's best for the city, just what's best for them, and so it will continue to be the case that the city will continue its slide into destitution and demolition, and any glimmer of hope of this city beginning to rise from the ashes of despair and destruction that you lot have dumped it in, will have to wait until the people of this city finally realise what a burden you are, and bloody well vote you out of office!
                                 Craig Pond, England First Party.
contact us at ;

Saturday, 27 November 2010

Killing Britains Traditions.

   Sometimes it's easy to see the damaging effects of the marxists political agenda.
Look at our enforced membership of the EU, or the relentless flood of third world immigration into Britain, but there are decisions made that have an equally damaging effect that might not be so easy to spot.

  Amongst the vast list of stunningly stupid policy ideas that NuLabour came up with was this one, which at first might seem to be the most destructive of Labours policies, until you take a closer look at it that is. Then, the negative effects of such  a policy come to light, and it shows that it was done to achieve these specific aims.

   The policy comes from that chubby idiot Ed Balls. Ironic isn't it, that a man named Balls talks b*llocks.
He had an idea for dropping from the schools curriculum both geography and history, replacing them with blogging and social networking!

  You cannot know where you're going, if you don't know where you've come from.
History is vitally important in showing children what the ancestors fought and died for, what they achieved and why they achieved it, it puts into perspective their nations place in the world, and therefore their place in it too, but most importantly, it instills in our children a sense of belonging, of knowing that before they were born, and after they've gone, their traditions and culture will continue!

  If you remove the right from our children to learn about their ancestors deeds and beliefs, then you cut them off from what it was their forefathers wanted for them, so in effect, you cut the children off from their identity, seeing as history and tradition are where identity come from.
If you take from a people their sense of belonging, you also remove their sense of loyalty to the nation state, and that is, and always has been, part of the plans of the NuLabour marxists!

   If you take a look at other Labour policies, you will see the same effect caused by them as well, this deliberate breaking of any nationalist feeling in favour of the creation of  a global, universal population, with no nationalist tendencies or loyalties at all.
Our membership of the communist, corrupt EU is designed to break our nationalism, as is the unending torrent of immigration, forced upon our communities to specifically break down our strong and just feelings of nationalism, and to encourage the belief that all peoples have just as much right to these lands as we indigenous do, in fact, everything that Labour have done has been aimed at breaking the nationalist spirit of the native peoples of these islands.

  Don't take anything at face value from our politicians, because the three so called mainstream parties have shown time and again to be equally as bad as each other, and they have shown time and again that their loyalties do not lie with the people they are supposed to represent, but with the forces of internationalism, and the totally criminal and corrupting influence of international finance.
We need to step back from this rush into national destruction through global/international/laissez faire bullshit, and take a look at what's really important to Britain. Do you honestly believe that it is coincidence that our children, our communities, and our society have become violent and selfish?
It is no coincidence!
It is the specific aims of the political establishment to break up Britain to make it easier to sell off and give away to new world ideologies, so their creation of a single world population can come to fruition, bringing with it their chance to install the real aim of all this treachery, a world government!

   It sounds like the plot from a James Bond film, but with a minimum of research you will discover that George Bush Sr and Jr both push for a new world order, and have stated so publicly, as has that one eyed treasonous b*****d Gormless Brown, and his gang of marxists.
  The stakes are as high as they could get, we nationalists have to make sure that we are ready to fight for this nation, be it in the political chambers, or on the streets of what used to be the home of modern democracy.

  contact us at;

Wednesday, 24 November 2010

Why isn't the local media all over this?

  This is the question I asked myself.
Why are the local media not all over this? Why would they sit by and say nothing as a small group of disabled people are persecuted for that disability, yet the senior council officers are allowed to waste almost three times the savings made from taking away books for the blind?

  The answer is simple; those that control the local media are a part of the same group that run the council and steal the taxpayers money!

  The editor-in-chief of our local newspaper, the Sentinel, is Mike Sassi, who underwent his Common Purpose training in 2005.
  Perhaps this has something to do with why this criminal waste of public funds hasn't been mentioned in his paper?
  And the problem is clearly the same at the BBC, a publicly funded organisation riddled with Common Purpose.
But just to give you a taste of just how deeply our services have been infiltrated by this scum, here's a brief list of some of the local bodies that are home to Stoke-on-Trent Common Purpose.

  The Learning and Skills council.
  North Staffs victim support.
  North Staffs carers association.
  North Staffs Regeneration Zone.
  Stoke-on-Trent PCT.
  Staffs University.
  Age Concern.
  Stoke-on-Trent city council.
  Business Broker centre, Shelton Enterprise Centre.
  Saltbox Christian Centre.
  Local Education Authority.
  Disability Solutions.
  Staffs fire and rescue.
  Blue Mountain Housing association.
  Choices Housing Association.
  Keele University.
  NHS Trust.
  The Furniture Mine.
  Potteries Housing Association.
  Bentilee Volunteers.

   I could go on for hours with this example of just how comprehensive the Common Purpose infiltration of our society has been, but I'm sure you get the message.
  The media is being manipulated so you only get to see what they want you to see, and this is how they have gotten away this treacherous undermining of our communities for so long.
  Staffs Police is another organisation that is run through with CP. All these people and bodies that are supposedly there to protect our society are actually manipulating it for their own ends. You need to wake up to the dangers of this group and its affiliates, or you'll find yourselves sleepwalking into a nightmare.

  contact us at;

Monday, 22 November 2010

Bloody council hypocrites!

  As a follow on to yesterdays blog about cuts being made by the city council in order to find £7 million of savings, I posted an article from the Sentinel that explained how the city council was removing talking books for the blind from library services, in order to save a paltry £13,600 per year.

   Take a look at the table below. This is from a freedom of information request by Councillor Mike Coleman, asking these corrupt council officers what was spent on the marxist programme of Common Purpose, and remember, this is paid for out of the public purse!

  They stop talking books for the blind to save £13,600, then waste just under £36,000 on undermining the bureaucracy that the city is supposed to run on!
Damn near three times what they save by punishing a small group of disabled people is eaten up by what they waste on this communist bullshit!
Common Purpose needs to be proscribed by the city council, its graduates banned from working for the city council in ANY capacity, and this should be the message put out by all local parties genuinely interested in democracy. The BNP in particular should ignore the ruling of their maniacal leader and unite with the rest of the city to fight this, no personal interests should come before the wellbeing of the city and its people.

  contact us at;

Sunday, 21 November 2010

Taking candy from babies, or books from the blind.

  How low can a group of council scumbags get?
In the hunt for the £7 million of savings required of them by the government, this city council will leave no stone unturned, except the one they're hiding under of course!
Childrens day centres closed, community halls disposed of, the mobile library history, and now, for the massive saving of £13,600 per year, talking books for the blind!

  Why are these thieving, lying, moneygrabbing tossers bringing harrassment to the lives of people who plainly have enough to contend with?
Why don't these masonic, Common Purpose sorts start making cuts and savings that will actually reduce the deficit?

  I'll tell you why, because to do so would mean hitting themselves in the pocket!

   Why should the blind go without talking books, but the city council still enjoy free parking, a perk which costs the taxpayers of this city £700,000! Now that would make a good saving!

  Why should the children have to lose out on the mobile library, but the city council still enjoy subsidised meals in their canteen, or spend hundreds of thousands of pounds tarting up their offices?

  Why should our communities do without community halls, but an evergrowing section of the council take £50k or more in salary?
And if they're not taking it for themselves, then they're giving it to their mates in the shape of cushy quango jobs.

   We absolutely must continue to bang away at this message to the electorate, and continue to highlight just how poor and corrupt the service is from these council deadbeats.
Only with a change of personnel will things get better, and the only chance you'll get for change in the next 5 years(!) will be the elections in May.

  contact us at;, or text to; 07955 142 653

Friday, 19 November 2010

Stoke-on-Trent city council couldn't organise a gangbang in a brothel.

  How is it that those at the top of the city council foodchain are paid for skills they plainly do not possess?

   Where is the legal knowledge that stops the council from straying into criminal behaviour, or the financial control and understanding that stops fraud and waste?
Where is the business acumen to guide us through fiscally tough times in order for us to continue our lives without the withdrawal of those services we most require and use?

  Well, one thing is abundantly clear, there's no point asking those morons heading the city council, because their actions display that they have no understanding of what's required to save this city!

   Yesterday, it was revealed that these brilliant minds at the top of the city council- yes, I am taking the p***- have a cunning plan to cover the £7 million reduction in their budget, they are going to introduce parking charges at both Dimensions and Fenton Manor swimming pools!

 They are going to raise an extra £300,000 or so from charging an already overcharged public, for the use of public services! Even as I write, I can hear Mohammed Pervez on the phone to his muslim mucker Mo Choudry............

   One of the basic rules of sound economic behaviour is the understanding that when times are financially tough, the way to alleviate the strain of business outgoings is to reduce local business taxes, because lower taxes provide the stimulus for growth, or continued usage.
Lower charges in order to attract more people into using your services is clearly an idea that has not made it to the top people in the city council, but if this simplest of sensible economic ideas hasn't registered ith these halfwits, what chance is there of any forseeable or lasting recovery?

  If the people in charge of this city council don't have the financial or business know-how to guide us through this chain of recessions, then why the hell do we continue to pay them such exorbitant salaries?
What are we paying them for? It clearly isn't for their sound financial planning, or their creative business ideas,
so why continue to throw money down the toilet?

   Their big idea for today is to increase charges on leisure and sporting facilities.
If you increase the prices, less people will attend. The less people that attend mean that jobs in these places will have to be lost, and that revenues will fall.
I sometimes think this is exactly what some of these chisellers want. Drive council businesses to the point where they become economically unviable, then these clowns at the Civic Centre can close them down and sell them off to their friends.

   At the next elections in May, you'd better make your choices wisely, or there won't be a city left.

   contact us at;, or, 07955 142 653.

Wednesday, 17 November 2010

More mosques, and more city council lies.

  At present, there are 14 mosques in use in Stoke-on-Trent, but with the Regent street mosque nearly ready, and another £2 million mosque planned for Chaplain Road, Normacot, our tally of mosques will be brought up to 16.

  But hang on a minute, the crooks and appeasers of Stoke-on-Trent city council are deliberately peddling misleading figures in a bid  to fool the people of this city into thinking that numbers of muslim immigrants are very low, but if that is the case, why has the number of mosques doubled over the past 5 years?

  I think we should take a closer look...................

  Despite the doubling of the number of mosques over 5 years, the city council are deliberately misleading the electorate as to the numbers of asian immigrants in the area, and the best way to highlight this is by using the city councils own figures.

   According to figures published in the city councils propaganda rag, "Our Tenants", Autumn, 2010, the figures are as follows;

  This may look sound, but it isn't.
First off, these are council tenants we are talking about, so does the council actually think we believe they don't know who they are housing?
They know exactly who, and how many, are housed in these properties!

  The second point is, who classes themselves as white British?
Turkish, Albanian, Romanian, Polish, Lithuanian, all class themselves as white British, so that original figure of 80.59% will be very misleading.

   Thirdly, if the asian muslim population is so small, why has the number of official mosques doubled?
The only reason for this is that the muslim population has grown significantly, despite the attempts of the city council to play down the numbers.
And whilst we're on the subject of mosques, let us not forget the unofficial ones! Private houses and businesses used as mosques all over the city, some of which cause problems within the communities in which they are set.
  One such unofficial mosque of which I've heard numerous complaints, is on William Coltman Way in Tunstall, where visitors to the house park across the neighbours drives, down both pavements, and block access for the residents, yet the council refuse to do anything about it. The city council also refuse to keep any information on the location, or the numbers, of these unofficial mosques.

  Finally, I'm adding the web address of a website that lists all the mosques in the UK, so you can check just how many there are in your neck of the woods.
  We can reverse this trend, we can stop the establishments refusal to put us native folk first, and all we need to do to stop it is vote these tossers out!
Please make sure you are registered to vote, and that you take the time to cast it, this is all we need to do to change the future of our towns and cities for good.   contact us at;

Friday, 12 November 2010

Show me yours, I'll show you mine.

The degradation of our political systems is well known to everyone with more than two operating braincells, but it is at local level, council politics, that I want to take a look at, and perhaps highlight some of the pitfalls from Stoke-on-Trent city council in order to throw a spotlight on what stupid things are happening in other parts of the country, perhaps your part of the country!
                     The number one financial problem in my humble opinion, because if you slash council officer salaries to a sensible level, the greedy b*****ds taking huge sums at the minute would pack up and bugger off to another council where they could continue taking vast amounts of public money under false pretences.
Stoke-on-Trent city council has 269 people getting- I won’t say earning because they don’t- £50,000 or more, the total bill for which is now an astronomical £18.9 million!
  And that 269 is up from 90 in 2005!
This is the criminal influence of Common Purpose, freemasonry, and the personal greed driven Labour Party, a body fairly equated with that of a sewer, it being so full of sh*t.
  Our new CEO came up from Devon, not because he had any genuine affection for the city or its people, and not because he felt the urge to put right what the Labour party has mismanaged and destroyed over 60 years, no, this southern surfer dude showed up on our doorstep because the position he applied for came with a gut wrenching salary of £195,000!
 His big idea for getting this city back on the straight and narrow is to invite in his consultancy mates at an initial cost of £400,000, but with the potential to rise to £4 million!
 And as we speak, this suntanned skidmark is in the process of spending hundreds of thousands of pounds on refurbishing one floor of the Civic Centre, with decking and water features to make it feel like a garden.
I’d personally like to drown him in his bloody water feature.
Remember, at this time the city council is in the process of finding £7 million of savings every year, for the next 4 years!
 This is also the same city council that gave the job of head of North Staffs Regeneration Partnership to a thief and a liar. The man put in charge of Regens £3 billion budget, stole his wifes rare book collection during their divorce, a collection valued at £35,000, and sold it a dealer for £4,000!
He was dragged before the courts and had to be told by the judge not to take or sell anything else of his wifes!!
And this is the quality of the top people in and around Stoke-on-Trent city council! Is it any bloody wonder this city looks worse now than it did after the Germans bombed it in WW2?!
 This city council is now undergoing its third fraud investigation, with 6 officers of the North Staffs Regeneration Partnership being suspended, and a man in the north east being arrested for contractual fraud and theft. Funnily enough, the description given by the police of the arrested man fits exactly with that of the former head of NSRP! A spooky coincidence, or something a bloody blindman could have seen coming?
  By the way, the head of North Staffs Regeneration Partnership was taking home a very respectable £150,000 a year in salary, but you know what they say, once a thief............
  Be sure and leave the details of your worst councillors and council officers as comments, we’ll have a measuring contest!

contact us at;

Tuesday, 9 November 2010

Changing Tack.

  What the hell is going on in British politics?!

  How can it be that the very people responsible for the dreadful state of this nation, are the same clowns elected and re-elected by what seems to be the majority of the electorate?  
More to the point, why would the electorate do such a damaging thing?

One part of the answer to that question is the unsuitability of a nationalist candidate in whom the handing over of Britains interests could be trusted to, and as time goes on, it becomes clearer that the most well known nationalist- Nick Griffin- simply isn’t fit to rule, or have anything to do with the running of a nation.
Nationalism stands bereft of the leadership needed to make a realistic challenge for the right to rule, not that there is a lack of quality, experience, or skill, far from it, the nationalist cause has a wealth of talent from which to choose, it is the splintered, factional nature of nationalism that is holding back any serious attempts to put together a shadow government, that and the far too numerous ego’s that always seem to intervene before common sense.

  Before I go on, let me just explain what I mean by nationalism.
  Nationalism is about blood and culture.  Being handed a passport 5 minutes after arrival does not make you British, being here for 2 or 3 generations does not make you British.
The first rule of being British indigenous, is of course the fact that we are white northern European, and have been for 20,000 years. This idea that the ownership of a piece of paper or the say so of some petty anti-British official reverses or negates these facts, is idiotic.
    So this civic nationalism is no nationalism at all, it is just another facet of PC liberalism, just another way of including foreigners in something to which they have no right of inclusion. If they find themselves moved towards the causes of nationalism, then they should take up that cause in their ancestral lands, the lands from which their families originate, and re-build them to the point where national pride returns. This trying to take the nations of Britain for themselves, is a cuckoo syndrome that is greatly damaging to the British, giving the viewpoint that the separate nations of Britain are not home to any indigenous peoples at all, something that is keenly promoted by those political traitors that currently infest what used to be the home to modern day democracy, Westminster.

Westminster will have to be fumigated before real Brits can operate from there again.

   In order to make the advances required in political structuring, nationalism needs to set aside those things that allow the continuance of factionalism. Racial nationalists need to unite behind those things upon which they are agreed, not argue over those things upon which we disagree, only in this way can we direct the protests of an entire movement at  the single target we need to destroy; government!
    We now suffer under a political system that is corrupted throughout. Local, regional, national, and international politics are all riddled with liars, cheats, thieves, and deceivers.
  We exist under the rule of a political ideology that states the lives of the indigenous white Europeans within their respective countries, are not as important as those of the immigrants that have colonised those countries, that believes the care and welfare of its armed forces personnel should come second to the technicalities of the human rights act in pandering to those same immigrants, that foist upon the native taxpayers the burden of footing the education bill for hundreds of thousands of foreign students, to the direct detriment of our children.
  And in particular, we see that islam is being used more and more to usurp both power and position from the native peoples, driven by a political establishment intent on breaking our communities, our social cohesion, and any feelings of nationalism, in favour of PC liberalism, globalism, and their undying yearning for a new world order with a single global race as its trophy.
 Of course, the Westminster scum have no worries on these matters, they are stealing enough money through the allowance schemes to allow them to choose the best performing schools, the safest neighbourhoods, the private hospitals, not for them the failing standards of a nations infrastructure, the no go areas imposed by immigrant colonisation, or the decimated NHS services that have slid further down the rankings as the number of immigrant workers increases.

   So what will it take to put right these deliberate attempts to derail Britain?
What it won’t take is new labels for old ideologies, for new fangled descriptions for ideas that have been dragged from the depths of political history, like the “big society”. Once again, Cameron shows he’s no Tory, just a socialist with a blue tie.
  This is the worst kind of Marxist crap, recycled, relabelled, and sold to the public as a panacea for the effects of a stale economy and downtrodden communities, despite the fact that these things were spawned by the very people now telling you what you should do!
There is no need of new ideologies, or of new labels for old ideas, any nationalist push for governance should be based on the one thing that will revive the interest in politics and their reason to vote, and that is the truth!


  We have an entire establishment floated on a raft of lies and bullshit, protected by a media that acts to mask the malfeasance of this rancid political connivance, and that is overseen by the vast numbers of Common Purpose, freemasons, Bilderbergers and illuminati that have been actively put into places of influence in order to stop this landtrain of deceit from crashing before its objectives are met.
  But any structure built on iffy foundations; and they don’t come more iffy than Britains  current political system; is open to damage, and if we shake it hard enough, we can bring the whole lot down about their ears.

When the footsoldiers of this corrupt regime, the uaf/searchlight scum, start to shout in the streets about Nazis, we should be right there at them, with the chant, traitors!
And when our meetings or demonstrations are met with the shouts and lies of these people, then they should be met with similar inconveniences at their meetings and demonstrations, and when in their bravery, they physically attack nationalists or the nationalist cause, then this too should be returned to them, only ten times harder or ten times more than what they gave out. It is time these people were shown that if the political system refuses to uphold our basic rights and freedoms, then we’ll bloody well uphold them ourselves!
As to winning victory in either local or national elections, it’s simply a case of getting the right message out, and that consists of policies that will change the face of your towns, cities, or even countries positively.
There is so much upon which nationalism is agreed. Stop all immigration, then reverse the process, withdrawal from the EU, the re-introduction  of corporal and capital punishment, proper prison sentences and policing, a return to the three ‘r’s curriculum, the need for an English parliament, stricter controls on banks and their investments, and a whole host of other policies.
The point is that this is the weapon with which we can shake the establishment, this is how we crash the house of cards their establishment is built on! Explaining to the electorate in clear and simple English how what we would enact as policy would affect them positively, is one of several vital points to be achieved, along with uniting the racial nationalists behind a nationwide manifesto, and bringing to the fore a selection of nationalists fit to lead a national government.

It’s a big ask, but it is certainly achievable, yet it stands or falls on the ability of the nationalist movement to persuade its best and brightest to put aside ego’s and technical differences, and to gather together to form a manifesto behind which we all stand, so that the people the length and breadth of Britain understand our aims. In one clear, concise document, we could explain our targets countrywide.
  These are the things that I genuinely believe will make the difference between success and failure for the nationalist movement, and if we can forego the pettiness of the past and create a set of policies behind which we can all stand in support, then irrespective of Griffin and the BNP, we can push nationalism on further in two years than its moved in ten.

Craig Pond, England First Party, Stoke-on-Trent Division.

  contact us at;