Total Pageviews

Thursday, 31 March 2011

City cuts are just a Labour con!

  Stoke-on-Trent city council cuts come into force today, they save £460,000, and cause immense disruption to the population, yet those responsible for these cuts would have you believe they had no choice in the matter, it was forced on them by government.

  Absolute rubbish and lies!

  The main instigator in this politically motivated vandalism is this chubby outsider, a hater of swimming pools, and a brown Adolf Hitler!                                                                                                                               
                                             Wrecking this city with his politically motivated lies! 
     The simple truth is that the libraries, the old folks' homes, the swimming pools, the golf courses and museums, these things do not have to close, the savings can be found elsewhere! This Labour lead council is lying to you about these closures, and it is also lying to you about why the Head of Finance, Paul Simpson, has left the city council! Judging from the rumblings within the Civic Centre, more disastrous news is on its way concerning the finance department, city council officers, and the taking of huge bribes!

  When are the people of Stoke-on-Trent going to wake up and see that Labour and its cronies have taken this city from a vibrant and commercially successful industrial city, and turned it into a desolate wasteland of no jobs, no homes- because they've demolished them!- a dumping ground for third world immigrants- Coventry, Birmingham, and Wolverhampton city councils have all broken their contracts with the UK Borders Agency, stating that they cannot take anymore asylum seekers. Where do you think they will put them? And remember, Stoke already has 586 registered asylum seekers, and they cost you £7.5 million per year approx!- and a lucky dip for thieving council officers, who have skimmed £millions from this city!

  They have systematically ruined our infrastructure, and pilfered the wealth of the people for decades, and it's about time that real Stokies stood up and said, 'no more!'

  If someone walked up and took a tenner from your pocket, the vast majority of Stokes natives would clock them one, but they allow the slimy Labour communists to steal from them on a daily basis, and still vote them in!

  If you people out there don't vote to save this city, it will become as all the others in the West Midlands, filled with immigrants, filled with crime, filled with the echoes of the native people, hard working, rough around the edges, but good hearted.

  The number one priority for the city council should be the care and welfare of its own people. What we get instead is the care and welfare of everybody but our own people! The closing of public amenities, the constant attempts to crush our culture in favour of foreign ones, the total lack of jobs through Labours complete incompetence at attracting firms in, and the wasting of £millions of pounds of taxpayers money, this is what your council give you, and it's about time you stood up for this city!

contact us at; efpstoke@gmail.com

Tuesday, 29 March 2011

Jobs for the boys!


  This city council is absolutely the perfect example of fraud, corruption, and dodgy dealing, and that is highlighted by its latest salaried appointment.

   Hardial Bhogal, the head of Renew, and complete and utter waste of bloody time, has been promised direct employment by the senior officers of this scabby council, as "director of place".

The freemason, Common Purpose infested city council have offered him a position that encompasses that of the previous head of the NSRP( North Staffs Regeneration Partnership), Tom Macartney.
   Read this article from the Guardian, 2002, to give you some idea of the calibre of this drain on council finances.

                                                                                                                 Hardly surprising he's smiling, his Labour party Common Purpose mates just sorted him out with a well paid job that he is clearly unfit to do!



       Walsall chief resigns before sacking vote.
 
A local authority branded a failure by the government was today looking for a new boss after its chief executive resigned hours before a vote on whether to sack him.
Hardial Bhogal quit as chief of Walsall council yesterday - shortly before councillors decided to dismiss him and other senior managers.
Mr Bhogal's resignation follows a damning audit commission report in June which recommended that a private sector management team should be brought in to improve the council's failing services.
A Walsall spokesman said today: "The council voted last night to comply with the recommendations from the audit commission that the senior management team be replaced. It was a very difficult decision for the councillors to make. They felt the council needed to move forward and get government help rather than government interference."
Mr Bhogal is to be temporarily replaced by the chief executive of Telford and Wrekin council, Michael Frater.
Walsall had been referred to the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister by the commission after suffering "severe service failures" and management problems.
The council had earlier been criticised by the commission, in January, when it was given until the end of April to demonstrate change. The steps which it took did not go far enough, the commission said.
Inspectors recommended that a new group of private sector managers should replace the council's current executive management, including the chief executive, for up to two years.
The local government minister, Nick Raynsford, said his department had suspended the threat of private sector intervention following the council's decision on its senior management.
"The government agrees with the council's decision to seek new leadership to take forward the demanding programme of improvement needed to improve local services in Walsall," he said.
"I am very pleased that Walsall has taken such a positive step forward in the light of the constructive criticisms they have received from recent inspection reports.
"I welcome the new role assigned to Michael Frater and have every confidence that he, working with the council's leadership and new management team, will make rapid progress in raising the standard of services provided to local people."

   And then the senior officers of Stoke-on-Trent city council drag 3rd rate crud like him here, and give him a bloody massive salary!
  This man was about to be sacked from his highly council position in Walsall, has made a complete and utter failure out of North Staffs Regeneration, yet is being taken on by Stoke-on-Trent city council!!


  The local elections in May are the last elections for 4 years, so if the people of Stoke-on-Trent want to see change for this city, they had better vote for it, because once that day is gone, we'll be stuck with your choices for 4 bloody years, so please make the right ones!


contact us at; efpstoke@gmail.com

Thursday, 24 March 2011

Labour's propaganda machine bumbles into life!

                                                                    Tony "the" Walley.



 This is going to be a large post, so I'll leave up for a week, please do try to read it though because it cuts to the heart of Stoke-on-Trent's political problems.

  Right, that far left idiot with a website no-one visits- Tony "the" Walley- has been banging his gums and making all kinds of unsubstantiated charges against me, posted on his site to which I am barred from commenting on!

  This is the kind of diarrhoea he spatters his website with.


Just when you thought it was safe to assume that the City of Stoke-on-Trent had recovered from the blip of being Nick Griffin’s BNP ‘Jewel In The Crown.

   Ladies and gentlemen of all creeds, colours and religions - let me introduce you to the England First Party [EFP], headed up locally by two men considered way to(sic) extreme even for the BNP.
Mark Leat was a former BNP Councillor and Craig Pond a former BNP group organiser and they are expected to appear, amongst a few others, on the ballot papers in the local council elections in May. Pond is expected to stand in Goldenhill & Sandyford and Leat in one of the wards in the south of the city.
BNP sources have confirmed that they were kicked out of the BNP for being too extreme in their views and in Ponds case for some of the intolerant bile he spews forth on his tiny PCF blog and on certain other ‘Nationalist’ forums.

      First off, neither Mark nor myself were kicked out for being extreme, we came across the same traitor at different times- Alby Walker- who wasn't interested in seeing the group grow. I resigned from the BNP, along with Terry Cope and Sam Tunstall, Mark was on the receiving end of Walkers dirty tactics and was shoved out of the party.
 Walley has been told on numerous occasions about peddling lies, it hasn't yet sunk in, though to be fair, it's going to take a long time to get through that seriously thick head!


      To give you some background, the England First Party was formed in 2003 by Mark Cotterill, who had been the founder and chairman of American Friends of the BNP. He had been responsible for pumping funds into the BNP until he decided that their politics no longer matched is own.

   Mark formed England First with several other nationalist stalwarts that had been sacked from the BNP for not meeting Nick Griffins low standards, Mark was a founding member of the BNP.



     The EFP have some very worrying policies, up until last June, one of their main manifesto pledges was "the abolition of all non-European faiths and religions". This is something that they later retracted but it gives somewhat of a flavour of the kind of people they hope to engage with.


   What's worrying about trying to protect the religious systems of your own country?

   Why should we let backward and barbaric religions into our country- especially islam- when the religion upon which our democracy is founded, is looked on with hatred and lethal violence by the people they want to flood our country with?
 England is a Christian country with Christian values, this is what made us so successful as a nation, until the communists got in that is!


 They have a white supremacist ideology which marks a clear difference to the ‘modern BNP’ and they are not afraid or have no desire to use electable language. They say that they want to reclaim the country from what they describe as ‘immigrant invaders’. They also advocate ‘repatriation of all immigrants to their lands of ancestral origin’, but nowhere do they say the matter will be voluntary.


Tony, Tony, Tony, how many times do I have to chastise you for telling porkies?
We are not white supremacists, we simply believe that our country belongs to our people, not the mishmash of foreigners that have been unceremoniously dumped here.
  Ask yourselves a question, why are immigrants here, what services do they provide that the English cannot provide for themselves?

Gun toting drug dealer?
Albanian people trafficker?
Yardie hitman?
Bitch slapping pimp?
Muslim heroin trafficker?

 Apart from the first, these are all careers that the English cannot technically perform, but even if we could, you have to ask if these are the sort of jobs we need in this country.

  As for repatriation,  I believe that as much of it as possible needs to be voluntary, but that we have to have the right to involuntarily remove those that refuse to go of their own volition. This is the same stance that all British governments have, it is a case of common sense.


     
The EFP use very derogatory comments when talking about ethnic minorities:
“… their clothes, their food, their culture, their psychology, their biology, their physiology and their history challenges ours at every point of the compass”.
This leaves no uncertainty about the kind of people who support them.

  What the hell is derogatory about saying, "their clothes, their culture, their physiology? Are you trying to suggest that there are no differences between our people and the endless stream of third world tat that government stuffs our country with? Can we not even point these differences out in order to save our own culture, our own traditions?


  Trying to force us into silence whilst you new world order arseholes destroy our country may be your idea of astute political behaviour, but it bloody well isn't ours! If we were talking about white immigration into Africa on the scale of the immigration we are facing here, you and your commie friends would be up in arms, defending the rights of indigenous people to their own homeland, you hypocrite!


   Last year they fielded just 7 candidates across the country in the local council elections, three of them were here in Stoke-on-Trent, the lack of interest was not surprising when you consider the party has as little as 100 members as of the last Electoral Commission figures.

 If we are so small as to not be worth bothering with, why are you bothering with us?
I think you have a secret crush on me, you lefty handbag swinger :)



    They fielded no candidates in last year’s general elections; instead they encouraged their members and supporters to support any National Front candidates.
They also advocate the nationalisation of most national and public services. They want to ban the association between the Unions and the Labour Party and they want to set up workers co-operatives to protect the interests of workers.

   We advocate the nationalising of certain utilities and public services, bodies that are needed to keep the country running. You're damn right we would ban the criminal association between the Labour party and the unions! The Labour party is run by the bloody communists that run the unions because the unions block vote with their members' votes! 
It is clearly corrupt to everyone but the Labour party, who can't see it because they too are so corrupt.


     Having said that one of their chosen candidates has not worked for years and chooses to spend his time writing extremist views in hate fuelled rants on the EFP Stoke website among others.
The fact that this candidate is seeking election and as such deems himself fit enough to undertake ward work alongside civic duties should be investigated by the Department for Work and Pensions.

   How crap does your argument have to be to attack a man over his disability?
I didn't ask for it, I didn't want it, I won't let it turn me into a housebound vegetable.


  Warren Lloyd, who is seeking election to the council as an independent for Meir, has major health issues which may result in him having to undergo a heart transplant. He still manages to work and to contribute to society. The difference is down to personal pride.

 Warrens disability isn't his ill health, it's the fact he's an idiot.


   If you feel the need to cast your vote outside of the mainstream candidates please look at who you are voting for.
There are a number of independent candidates that are standing that seek to represent their communities and will do so with a willing heart. They have no issue with anyone who lives in their wards regardless of skin colour or religion.

 Yes people, take a look at the so called independents. Most of them have been in more parties that Oliver Reed, most of these are ex-Labour. 

Independent?  I don't think so.



     There are also groups like the City Independents and Community Voice that are also outside of the mainstream party structure. No one should have the desire to see the City turn to the extremes of far right politics as an alternative to the main three.

 Community Voice?!


 Just a bunch of hardline marxists, sex offenders, and ex-Labour bullies!


  You know why people are becoming more and more attracted to nationalism Tony, because nationalism will give them the right to choose. 
The electorate have never been given the chance to have their say on whether they want all this immigration, it was forced on us by the politicians that you support, and the people haven't been given the chance to vote on our disastrous membership of the EU, this too has been forced on them by the politicians that you support. 


  Do you want to know why the people have never been given the chance to cast their vote?


  Because if they were to get a vote on these things, the British would send the immigrants and the EU packing, and the politicians that you support and promote know it!


    Still not decided? Let me show you some of the views of a confirmed English First Candidate:

On the local arrest of a number of people suspected of terrorist activities:


At this festive time of the year, I would just like to thank Stoke-on-Trent city council for housing murdering terrorist Muslim scum in this city.
The Potteries Shopping Centre might need modernising, but not by exploding some bloody immigrant with a Semtex waistcoat, and the native people of these parts certainly deserve better than being blown to smithereens whilst out Christmas shopping for their loved ones.
Still, if the Muslims of this city would provide a little more effort in ridding their communities of these extremist morons, instead of sitting back and letting this terrorism blossom, they might get an easier ride from those of us who would like to see them go back to their own continent, where they could beat their wives, shag their own children instead of young white girls, and blow the crap out of each other, rather than us and ours.
The council and the politicians need to understand something though, if ever these cowards manage to blow something up in this city, they'd better run for cover, because the backlash against such behaviour won't just fall on the Muslims, but also on those that have stuffed our communities full of them.

  What's wrong with that?
You fill our city with these foreign terrorists and murderers, rapists and drug dealers, and then complain when we highlight the injustice of this!

  Why should native Stokies have to put up with this council caused crime wave? The caveman like behaviour of far too many of these people is clear to see, or had you forgotten about the boy raping imam from Tunstall, the 13 year old muslim boy that assaulted and raped a white woman in Cobridge in 2010?
 Or how about the four arrested muslim men, charged with terrorist offences?

  Just because you are a supporter of a political regime that is anti-white, anti-British, doesn't mean we all are. If you don't like truthful comments about the filling of our city with third world scroungers, stop filling our city with third world scroungers!



 In another Anti-Muslim rant:

  We simply cannot allow this situation to continue.
Kick this hypocritical, two faced lying scum out of our country, and if the establishment that is there to protect these islands and their native peoples refuse to do so, then matters should be taken into our own hands.
If it comes down to the survival of the indigenous people and their culture, or the backward and neanderthal behaviour of these bloody Muslims, I know where my loyalties lie.
 
   Spoken like a true Englishman, and I stand by every word!


Enough is enough.

 On the EDL:

    It was fantastic to watch so many patriots march against the enforced presence of Islam in what used to be a green and pleasant land, and despite \Tommy Robinsons multiculturalistic claims, there is no place in England for this backward and barbaric religion, or those that wish to practise it.
But just what are these protests achieving?
They are highlighting the fact that numerous governments have ridden roughshod over the democratic rights of the British electorate by forcing these counter culturalists into our communities, but if the EDL don't have the people within the political system to help enforce the changes needed to stop this Westminster displacement, then nothing will change.
What they absolutely must do if they want to see their country re tuned to them, is to vote for the nationalists that stand in their area, and if none are, then they need to bring them in, or stand themselves, because all the shouting and flag waving in the world won't see the current crop of Westminster liars and cheats change the system to suit the EDL.

 If you think that is wrong, it reflects the treason in your character, not mine.
  Once again, I stand by every word of that, because that is the truth of our situation.


On gay people:

   According to Pink News, the majority of people are in favour of same sex marriages. Rubbish and lies. Most people are not in favour of this.
Marriage is a Christian ceremony meant to unite a man and a woman in matrimony before God, and according to the bible, homosexuality is a sin, so how the hell do they figure to let them marry?!
Read this depressingly bad article on how the sexual deviants are being promoted as a new lifestyle choice for our youngsters.
No walk of life, no area of our culture has been left untouched by the poisonous hand of political correctness, even to the point of trying to infect our children with the idea that homosexuality is something to be aimed for.
Our country has no hope of survival if this wicked and reckless behaviour is not stopped.

 Homosexuality is becoming a threat to the fabric of decent lives. If it isn't being used as an excuse for promoting local far left politicians, then the deviants in both local and national politics are trying to force the teaching of it onto our youngsters in school, which is an absolute disgrace!
  The choices you make in life come with consequences, and one of the consequences of a homosexual relationship is the inability to have children, and that is there for a reason. 


  Children need a mother and a father because they learn different things from them, lessons that they will need in life. It also provides stability for the child. 
  What they do not need is two daddies who once a year parade about the city in brightly coloured lycra, bragging about how they don't function normally!
  It is a private thing, and should be kept that way, and bringing back Article 28 is a must.


In other state sponsored rants [by us the taxpayer] all Muslims have been called paedophiles, our council officers have been accused of being corrupt and described as thieves and our current elected councillors have been insulted out of hand.

 All muslims are exposed to the rantings of Mohammed the paedophile.
All muslims are taught that Mohammed the paedophile was the perfect man, therefore whatever he did is acceptable.


 Mohammed the paedophile married Ayisha when she was 6 years old, he connsumated the marriage when she was 9 years old, that makes him a paedophile.


  There is something in islam called Mufa'khathat, it means, "placing between the thighs."  It is specific instructions on how muslim men are allowed to assault children for their own sexual gratifiication. Under sharia, Mufa'khathat becomes worse, allowing muslim males to penetrate a child anally for their own sexual gratification.


All muslims are taught about Mohammed.


  I have accused our council officers of corruption! How the hell can you put that down as a black mark against me?!

  We should change the name of the Civic Centre to Fagin's Den!


3  Fraud Squad investigations, with more to come.

6 council officers suspended, and 1 arrested and charged with fraud and theft.


The disappearence of up to £4 million when the North Staffs Race Equality Council suddenly closed.


Huge goodbye payments to leaving council officers.


The hiring of ex-officers as consultants.


  You know Tony, most people think you're an idiot, you don't have to prove it conclusively.




  Our current councillors- or at least most of them- need to be criticised out of hand! They are elected to run this city, yet they sit back and let the communists of the Labour party do it.


  They are supposed to be the guardians of the public wealth, yet the publics money is squandered in the most shocking ways! The buildings and amenties that belong to the people are abused, closed, sold off to mates, and all the time, the taxpayer is charged more and more, but gets less and less!


  Your defence of these third rate chancers is pathetic.


   I ask, is this the calibre of person that we want to elect to represent us?
To promote our City?
To help attract inward investment?

   You're damn right it is!


Clearly your communist mates haven't achieved these things, or you wouldn't be talking about them. Still, they've only had 60+ years to get it right. :)





The BNP are in decline lot only locally, but nationally
too. Councillors like Michael Coleman, whether you agree with his politics or not, are respected for being hard working councillors.

It appears that there is a more sinister and extreme element, whose politics are way past the ‘far right’ who are seeking to prosper from the downfall of the BNP.


 Who are you calling sinister, fatty? 


Tell me which is more extreme, a man demanding his people come first in their own country, or the man that says foreigners should come first in his country?


  Which is more extreme, a man that says the countries of the middle east should be allowed to sort out their problems, or the man who promotes interference and violence toward those countries?


Which is more extreme, the man that says no to the promotion of sexual deviancy in our schools, or the man that tries to promote sexual deviancy in our schools?


Who is more extreme, the man that says deport the foreign terrorists that threaten the lives of his fellow countrymen, or the man that imports these terrorists to threaten the lives of his fellow countrymen?




  Extremism is the realm of the liars and cheats that make up our government and establishment, with  Labours communists being the main instigators.


All we can hope for is that everyone in our City sees right through the charade, deception, lies, intolerance of these charlatans and that we keep our City free from the embarrassment of being tarnished by the nation of having a racist element.
I am not advocating that we all follow a mainstream party, what I am absolutely saying is that there are alternatives, be them in other political groups, or acting as true independents, that are much more worthy of our vote.
The upcoming elections are the most important in modern times, which will see fewer councillors representing us.
Let’s make the most of them.
Let's get the right people into the chamber, people who will look after our best interests and the interests of the City as a whole.

  Tony, it is my heartfelt belief that you represent exactly what this city doesn't need. You are a liar, a communist,
and if you'll forgive me for being personal, about as useful as tits on a goldfish.

contact us at; efpstoke.gmail.com

Tuesday, 22 March 2011

We're not the only ones who see our city dying.

  I don't know who it was that made this short film, and England First Party had no part in its making, but my mate, and fellow England First candidate, Spencer Cartlidge, sent this over to me to highlight what we had been talking about; how Labour in particular have helped to destroy what was once a vibrant and successful industrial city, and left it looking like a village in Lybia!

  This is why we ask you for your vote at the upcoming elections, because if someone doesn't do something soon, there won't be any city left to save, so remember, come May 5th, vote England First!

contact us at; efpstoke@gmail.com

Thursday, 17 March 2011

Does the stupidity of the city council know no bounds?

  Sometimes, Stoke-on-Trent city council does things that have no earthly sense to them at all, clearly because those people charged with making such decisions have no bloody sense, and the decision to start work on a new bus station that looks like a UFO, after cutting over £300,000 of subsidies to the public transport companies that will result in the loss of 44 bus routes, has to be the stupidest decision of all!


  What the hell is the point of a new bus station if there are no bus routes for the passengers to travel?

                                    A barren wasteland of few passengers and even fewer buses.
                                                 The genius of Stoke-on-Trent city council.

    This is the level of unintelligent decision making in the city council at the present time, at it is just another example of cuts being made not because they are necessary, but because the inconvenience caused is making a political point!

  And this isn't the only ridiculous decisions we've seen come out of the Civic Centre, remember the library services for the blind being cut to save £13,500? 
  But then the city council waste £36,000 of the taxpayers money on Common Purpose!- Common Purpose are political freemasons.

   After trying unsuccessfully to close Dimensions, the city council go after another two swimming pools, closing Shelton and Tunstall under the lie that maintainence and repair costs are too much!

Bollocks!

Maintainence clearly isn't an issue because there has been none, and when it comes to repairs, the city council always bump up the costs when they want to get rid of something, but I'll bet none of you have seen a council breakdown of the repairs needed?
 No, didn't think so.

  And our illustrious council leader, Pervez, has come out and said that they have saved over £1 million by cutting some management positions.

£1 million?!

 The £50,000 and above pay bracket in the council now costs the people of this city £18.9 million!
 This should be at least halved, and the cuts should start with the department heads of those departments who need the aid of outside consultants! What kind of a mental setup allows managers to stay in highly paid jobs, when they can't do those bloody jobs?!

 There needs to be a complete rebuilding of the city councils salary structure in order to get rid of these greedy, moneygrabbing tossers, and fill the positions instead from the large amount of excellent council employees that always get overlooked, or tarred with the same brush that the overpaid underachievers that make up the senior management are always getting painted with.

  Good things can happen if you, the electorate, use your vote wisely and don't just vote the same old faces back in. If you're tired of your amenities and services going, cast a different vote and get a different future, the choice is yours!

  contact us at; efpstoke@gmail.com

Monday, 14 March 2011

Is Tunstall next for giant mosque?

   The grip of islam, that barbaric and backward religion practiced by so many Stoke-on-Trent residents, has blossomed from a small minority, into an overly large and interfering body, and from the looks of it, it is only set to get worse.

  In Hanley- and just about the only new building of note in the entire city- resides this yellow and green monstrosity that represents a foreign culture that the political establishment seem to be replacing British culture with, and it's an ongoing process.


   What hasn't been made clear, or even pointed out to the residents of this city, is that there is now a giant mosque in Hanley, and in 2008, the plans for another giant mosque were passed by Stoke-on-Trent city council, the detailed plans having recently been submitted for a three storey building!

  So out of the three constituencies that make up the city, Stoke South has plans for a massive mosque in Normacot, and Stoke Central has the Shelton eyesore, so when will Stoke North be getting a giant mosque for its ever growing muslim population, and where will it be situated?

  There are whispers and rumours about this, the one that seems to make the most sense being the targetting of Tunstall library for a Tunstall based mosque.
 The police station is closing, the swimming pool has just been closed, and for several years now, there has been talk of closing the library, that leaves nearly all of the block of land these properties sit on, closed down.
  With a city council prepared to do anything to appease these invaders, planning permission from our crooked planning officers will not be a problem, enforcing their multicultural stance upon the native citizens of this city in just the same way that the political parties do, leaving us with nowhere to complain or challenge these decisions.

  My personal opinion is that the native people of this city need to change the political representatives that they currently have, because even those councillors that stand against the city council are being shown to be ineffectual through their inability to unite in the face of a common enemy.

 Just in case you think I'm exaggerating, take a look at this website, and understand that there are dozens of unofficial mosques right across this city, private homes and businesses that are being used for prayer meetings, and not a word from Health and Safety!

http://mosques.muslimsinbritain.org/show-browse.php
I bet the Christians wouldn't get away with that.

contact us at; efpstoke@gmail.com 

Thursday, 10 March 2011

Creams not the only thing that rises to the surface!

  There are local elections fast approaching, and like a flood, it is bringing things to the surface that would have been better left where they were.
 Like Mark Meredith for instance.
                                   Meredith talking at the UAF conference with his fascist mates.

Word is Meredith is going to be running for office as a councillor, which is a ridiculous thought considering the bloody awful mess he made of things as mayor!
 But he seems to have no shame does this one, so perhaps I should point out that this far left, UAF scumbag is hated by even his own!

  This from the Socialist Unity website.

  "Stoke Labour’s fortunes are not all the doing of Brown’s gross ineptitude. Since last year, Labour have been the senior partner in a grand coalition of the LibDems and the Conservative and Independent Alliance groups. Existing as a glorified committee dedicated to rubber-stamping the elected mayor’s neoliberal plans, its most high profile policies have been met with anger and opposition. For example, the mayor’s office are determined to drive through a “shake up” of the city’s high schools by closing and merging some of them into New Labour’s flagship City Academies. This has provoked a storm of protest from those set to be affected by the changes. The depth of the opposition was such that the local party bureaucracy granted recalcitrant Labour councillors permission to fight the programme … as long as they fell into line and voted for the closures at the council’s budget meeting. Every single one of them fell into line, and in so doing many of them sealed their fate at the polls. Labour have also suffered from its attempt to close the popular Dimensions splash pool in Burslem, for the sake of a £60,000 shortfall in the council budget. Announcing such a measure in the lead up to local elections wasn’t the smartest of political moves. But such blunders are typical of the mayor’s office. He has presided over forced demolitions, care homes closures, more council job losses … while thinking nothing off frivolously wasting money on overseas jollies and stays in five star hotels. Shamefully, all this comes from Mark Meredith, ex-Militant and ex-Socialist Appeal. It makes you wonder if he ever feels a twinge of guilt from whatever remains of a Marxist conscience."

  Something else that has bobbed to the surface is Roger "the dodger" Ibbs.
Roger was arrested alogside Mark Meredith when the iffy dealings with Mo Choudary over the Dimensions swimming pool hit the headlines, and although Roger was released from court, he wasn't found not guilty, he was released because the CPS said there was not enough evidence to prosecute, and that is a huge difference.
                                                           Roger "the dodger" Ibbs.

   Still, having failed to close the Dimensions pool, it's good to see that our city council didn't take defeat lying down, and closed two other swimming pools instead. You should thank Pervez for this, and for the attempt to close Dimensions as well. Don't know what it is he has against swimming pools, after all, his mate Mo owns one!

  I notice that the child sex offender Wanger is back on the scene, sucking up to his muslim buddies in an attempt to get re-elected in Tunstall. I find it appaling that city councillors would have anything to do with this retched specimen, but it just goes to show how poorly we are represented in council if our councillors will ignore the past of this man for the sake of his vote. I'd much rather see a display of principles from our councillors than colluding with the likes of Wanger, surely to God, anything this man touches becomes tainted with the nasty habits hidden inside him.

                         Wannabe paedophile, Lee Wanger. Don't hire this guy as your baby sitter!          


   The muslims won't mind that though, mufa'khathat will see them welcome him with open arms.

  I feel sorry for the people of this city- to a certain extent- because for the most, the quality of representative is at best third rate, and it is no wonder that nothing gets done for the people. So it will fall to them to vote in the changes that will see the new faces required to change the system, this is the most important thing about the upcoming elections, getting the people out to vote.

  For our part, we will be looking to stand as many candidates for the England First Party, Stoke-on-Trent division, as we can, so if you have one of our candidates standing in your area, know that a vote for them is a vote for democracy!

contact us at; efpstoke@gmail.com

Saturday, 5 March 2011

We'd be better off with Ken Dodd running our finances!

  I received the Freedom of Information request from the Debt Management Office of the government, and it makes me think that the senior officers of tthe finance department should be done away with, we'd be better off with Ken Dodd running our finances!

  Check out the documents below to see just how well the finance department did when over the space of a year they invested a total of £708 million!

United Kingdom
Debt
Management
Office

Eastcheap Court
11 Philpot Lane
London EC3M 8UD


Tel: 0845 357 6259
Email:recordsmanagementservice@dmo.gsi.gov.uk



2nd March 2011
FOI20110209
response to FOI Request
Dear Mr Pond,

I am writing in response to your email dated 9th February 2011 requesting information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.  Our response is below.

  1. All deposits made by Stoke-on-Trent City Council that made up the £708,511,000 investment, the dates of those deposits and the duration of these deposits.
Please see Sheet 1 of the attached document.

  1. The total interest earned on the £708,511,000 investment.
The total interest earned on this investment was £48,137.54.

  1. Can you please clarify whether the £25.26 million currently in the account was part of the £708 million or whether it was an entirely separate investment

The £25.26m that was the total amount of outstanding deposits as at 14th December 2010 is part of the cumulative sum mentioned above.

  1. Please supply a list of all withdrawals since 5th February 2009 to the current date.

Sheet 2 of the attached spreadsheet lists all deposits made by Stoke-on-Trent from their initial deposit on 5th February 2009 to 9th February 2011 (the date of the FOI request).

Yours sincerely,
Information Manager.

  The following figures are the rate of interest paid, how much was put in, the date the money went in and the date it came out, and finally the amount of interest it earned. Take a look at the top row, the best part of £11 million invested overnight, and all we get is £73.84!!

  The government will take all the pooled money from the different councils that invest in the DMO, invest it in one of the high street banks that since the bailout we are major shareholders in, and give the councils one sixth of the interest earned!

  The real choker about this is the fact that on an investment total of £708 million, all we get is £48 thousand!







 Rate   .......Deposit  ........Trade ...........Date.  ..........Maturity .............Date .............Interest

0.25....... £10,780,000.00 4 Jan 10 5 Jan 10 £73.84

0.25....... £1,000,000.00 6 Jan 10 8 Jan 10 £13.70

0.25........ £1,760,000.00 6 Jan 10 12 Jan 10 £72.33

0.25........ £638,000.00 8 Jan 10 13 Jan 10 £21.85

0.25........ £727,000.00 11 Jan 10 13 Jan 10 £9.96

0.25........ £1,000,000.00 15 Jan 10 18 Jan 10 £20.55

0.25........ £1,000,000.00 15 Jan 10 19 Jan 10 £27.40

0.25........ £1,000,000.00 15 Jan 10 20 Jan 10 £34.25

0.25........ £1,000,000.00 15 Jan 10 21 Jan 10 £41.10

0.25........ £1,200,000.00 15 Jan 10 22 Jan 10 £57.53

0.25........ £1,122,000.00 15 Jan 10 25 Jan 10 £76.85

0.25........ £880,000.00 18 Jan 10 25 Jan 10 £42.19

0.25........ £2,400,000.00 8 Feb 10 9 Feb 10 £16.44

0.25........ £2,424,000.00 8 Feb 10 10 Feb 10 £33.21

0.25........ £1,000,000.00 15 Feb 10 17 Feb 10 £13.70

0.25........ £1,000,000.00 15 Feb 10 18 Feb 10 £20.55

0.25........ £4,347,000.00 15 Feb 10 22 Feb 10 £208.42

0.25........ £2,500,000.00 16 Feb 10 17 Feb 10 £17.12

0.25........ £1,217,000.00 16 Feb 10 24 Feb 10 £66.68

0.25........ £1,000,000.00 16 Feb 10 23 Feb 10 £47.95

0.25........ £3,615,000.00 19 Feb 10 24 Feb 10 £123.80

0.25........ £863,000.00 23 Feb 10 2 Mar 10 £41.38

0.25........ £921,000.00 25 Feb 10 4 Mar 10 £44.16

0.25........ £2,351,000.00 1 Mar 10 2 Mar 10 £16.10

0.25........ £1,872,000.00 2 Mar 10 4 Mar 10 £25.64

0.25........ £2,150,000.00 15 Mar 10 18 Mar 10 £44.18

0.25........ £1,354,000.00 16 Mar 10 18 Mar 10 £18.55

0.25........ £5,972,000.00 19 Mar 10 22 Mar 10 £122.71

0.25........ £5,168,000.00 23 Mar 10 24 Mar 10 £35.40

0.25........ £4,161,000.00 15 Apr 10 16 Apr 10 £28.50

0.25........ £2,000,000.00 15 Apr 10 20 Apr 10 £68.49

0.25........ £1,500,000.00 15 Apr 10 21 Apr 10 £61.64

0.25........ £6,000,000.00 15 Apr 10 23 Apr 10 £328.77

0.25........ £3,000,000.00 16 Apr 10 19 Apr 10 £61.64

0.25........ £1,344,000.00 16 Apr 10 23 Apr 10 £64.44

0.25........ £1,000,000.00 22 Apr 10 23 Apr 10 £6.85

0.25........ £3,119,000.00 22 Apr 10 28 Apr 10 £128.18

0.25........ £2,180,000.00 29 Apr 10 30 Apr 10 £14.93

0.25........ £3,934,000.00 29 Apr 10 4 May 10 £134.73

0.25........ £1,000,000.00 29 Apr 10 7 May 10 £54.79

0.25........ £2,110,000.00 30 Apr 10 10 May 10 £144.52

0.25........ £2,500,000.00 4 May 10 21 May 10 £291.10

0.25........ £1,500,000.00 4 May 10 19 May 10 £154.11

0.25........ £2,525,000.00 4 May 10 18 May 10 £242.12

0.25........ £7,000,000.00 5 May 10 21 May 10 £767.12

0.25........ £7,000,000.00 5 May 10 24 May 10 £910.96

0.25........ £2,410,000.00 5 May 10 26 May 10 £346.64

0.25........ £1,232,000.00 10 May 10 27 May 10 £143.45

0.25........ £1,000,000.00 11 May 10 12 May 10 £6.85

0.25........ £1,469,000.00 11 May 10 20 May 10 £90.55

0.25........ £3,000,000.00 11 May 10 27 May 10 £328.77

0.25........ £1,346,000.00 13 May 10 24 May 10 £101.41

0.25........ £1,000,000.00 14 May 10 26 May 10 £82.19

0.25........ £4,516,000.00 14 May 10 27 May 10 £402.11

0.25........ £6,809,000.00 17 May 10 28 May 10 £513.01

0.25........ £1,875,000.00 18 May 10 4 Jun 10 £218.32

0.25........ .£3,500,000.00 20 May 10 21 May 10 £23.97

0.25........ £3,120,000.00 20 May 10 4 Jun 10 £320.55

0.25........ .£1,134,000.00 24 May 10 4 Jun 10 £85.44

0.25........ £791,000.00 26 May 10 4 Jun 10 £48.76

0.25........ £2,000,000.00 27 May 10 8 Jun 10 £164.38

0.25........ £1,000,000.00 27 May 10 9 Jun 10 £89.04

0.25........ £2,920,000.00 27 May 10 11 Jun 10 £300.00

0.25........ £2,458,000.00 28 May 10 16 Jun 10 £319.88

0.25........ £4,000,000.00 28 May 10 17 Jun 10 £547.95

0.25........ £5,000,000.00 28 May 10 18 Jun 10 £719.18

0.25........ £1,445,000.00 1 Jun 10 21 Jun 10 £197.95

0.25........ £665,000.00 2 Jun 10 21 Jun 10 £86.54

0.25........ £2,000,000.00 3 Jun 10 21 Jun 10 £246.58

0.25........ £2,000,000.00 3 Jun 10 22 Jun 10 £260.27

0.25....     £1,357,000.00 3 Jun 10 23 Jun 10 £185.89

0.25........ £7,000,000.00 3 Jun 10 24 Jun 10 £1,006.85

0.25........ £1,127,000.00 4 Jun 10 7 Jun 10 £23.16

0.25........ £3,000,000.00 4 Jun 10 8 Jun 10 £82.19

0.25........ £935,000.00 7 Jun 10 16 Jun 10 £57.64

0.25........ £4,686,000.00 8 Jun 10 25 Jun 10 £545.63

0.25........ £1,211,000.00 9 Jun 10 10 Jun 10 £8.29

0.25........ £1,500,000.00 10 Jun 10 24 Jun 10 £143.84

0.25........ £1,677,000.00 10 Jun 10 25 Jun 10 £172.29

0.25........ £2,193,000.00 11 Jun 10 29 Jun 10 £270.37

0.25........ £1,000,000.00 15 Jun 10 16 Jun 10 £6.85

0.25........ £2,000,000.00 15 Jun 10 28 Jun 10 £178.08

0.25........ £3,000,000.00 15 Jun 10 29 Jun 10 £287.67

0.25........ £9,247,000.00 15 Jun 10 2 Jul 10 £1,076.71

0.25........ £1,596,000.00 21 Jun 10 5 Jul 10 £153.04

0.25........ £719,000.00 22 Jun 10 30 Jun 10 £39.40

0.25........ £3,924,000.00 24 Jun 10 6 Jul 10 £322.52

0.25........ £763,000.00 25 Jun 10 5 Jul 10 £52.26

0.25........ £1,561,000.00 28 Jun 10 8 Jul 10 £106.92

0.25........ £5,955,000.00 29 Jun 10 9 Jul 10 £407.88

0.25........ £1,339,000.00 30 Jun 10 8 Jul 10 £73.37

0.25........ £2,000,000.00 1 Jul 10 13 Jul 10 £164.38

0.25........ £5,602,000.00 1 Jul 10 16 Jul 10 £575.55

0.25........ £5,000,000.00 2 Jul 10 5 Jul 10 £102.74

0.25........ £3,821,000.00 2 Jul 10 7 Jul 10 £130.86

0.25........ £3,000,000.00 5 Jul 10 6 Jul 10 £20.55

0.25........ £3,150,000.00 5 Jul 10 7 Jul 10 £43.15

0.25........ £2,970,000.00 6 Jul 10 12 Jul 10 £122.05

0.25........ £6,212,000.00 7 Jul 10 19 Jul 10 £510.58

0.25........ £2,290,000.00 8 Jul 10 20 Jul 10 £188.22

0.25........ £5,312,000.00 9 Jul 10 21 Jul 10 £436.60

0.25........ £3,409,000.00 12 Jul 10 21 Jul 10 £210.14

0.25........ £1,828,000.00 14 Jul 10 19 Jul 10 £62.60

0.25........ £8,080,000.00 15 Jul 10 23 Jul 10 £442.74

0.25........ £3,000,000.00 15 Jul 10 28 Jul 10 £267.12

0.25........ £648,000.00 16 Jul 10 27 Jul 10 £48.82

0.25........ £3,922,000.00 19 Jul 10 29 Jul 10 £268.63

0.25........ £2,000,000.00 20 Jul 10 23 Jul 10 £41.10

0.25........ £2,560,000.00 20 Jul 10 26 Jul 10 £105.21

0.25........ £2,222,000.00 21 Jul 10 22 Jul 10 £15.22

0.25........ £3,841,000.00 23 Jul 10 26 Jul 10 £78.92

0.25........ £1,000,000.00 26 Jul 10 27 Jul 10 £6.85

0.25........ £1,000,000.00 26 Jul 10 28 Jul 10 £13.70

0.25........ ,£4,863,000.00 26 Jul 10 30 Jul 10 £133.23

0.25........ £2,000,000.00 28 Jul 10 2 Aug 10 £68.49

0.25........ £2,624,000.00 28 Jul 10 4 Aug 10 £125.81

0.25........ £1,500,000.00 29 Jul 10 4 Aug 10 £61.64

0.25........ £2,616,000.00 29 Jul 10 5 Aug 10 £125.42

0.25......... £2,367,000.00 30 Jul 10 12 Aug 10 £210.76

0.25........ £2,471,000.00 30 Jul 10 13 Aug 10 £236.95

0.25........ £1,000,000.00 2 Aug 10 6 Aug 10 £27.40

0.25........ £2,900,000.00 2 Aug 10 18 Aug 10 £317.81

0.25........ £1,932,000.00 2 Aug 10 20 Aug 10 £238.19

0.25........ £5,000,000.00 3 Aug 10 20 Aug 10 £582.19

0.25........ £2,438,000.00 3 Aug 10 23 Aug 10 £333.97

0.25........ £1,153,000.00 4 Aug 10 23 Aug 10 £150.05

0.25........ £1,393,000.00 5 Aug 10 6 Aug 10 £9.54

0.25........ £1,500,000.00 16 Aug 10 17 Aug 10 £10.27

0.25........ £3,058,000.00 16 Aug 10 24 Aug 10 £167.56

0.25........ £2,372,000.00 18 Aug 10 24 Aug 10 £97.48

0.25........ £5,026,000.00 19 Aug 10 24 Aug 10 £172.12

0.25........ £1,000,000.00 20 Aug 10 26 Aug 10 £41.10

0.25........ £1,354,000.00 20 Aug 10 27 Aug 10 £64.92

0.25........ £3,000,000.00 23 Aug 10 25 Aug 10 £41.10

0.25........ £8,769,000.00 23 Aug 10 27 Aug 10 £240.25

0.25........ £1,500,000.00 25 Aug 10 26 Aug 10 £10.27

0.25........ £1,858,000.00 25 Aug 10 2 Sep 10 £101.81

0.25........ £1,205,000.00 25 Aug 10 3 Sep 10 £74.28

0.25........ £6,345,000.00 27 Aug 10 31 Aug 10 £173.84

0.25........ £1,000,000.00 31 Aug 10 2 Sep 10 £13.70

0.25........ £2,000,000.00 31 Aug 10 3 Sep 10 £41.10

0.25........ £5,733,000.00 31 Aug 10 6 Sep 10 £235.60

0.25........ £1,307,000.00 1 Sep 10 7 Sep 10 £53.71

0.25........ £6,000,000.00 1 Sep 10 9 Sep 10 £328.77

0.25........ £6,000,000.00 1 Sep 10 10 Sep 10 £369.86

0.25........ £1,009,000.00 2 Sep 10 3 Sep 10 £6.91

0.25........ £1,360,000.00 3 Sep 10 9 Sep 10 £55.89

0.25........ £3,450,000.00 6 Sep 10 14 Sep 10 £189.04

0.25........ £1,122,000.00 7 Sep 10 13 Sep 10 £46.11

0.25........ £3,227,000.00 9 Sep 10 16 Sep 10 £154.72

0.25........ £4,584,000.00 10 Sep 10 20 Sep 10 £313.97

0.25........ £636,000.00 13 Sep 10 21 Sep 10 £34.85

0.25........ £5,936,000.00 14 Sep 10 21 Sep 10 £284.60

0.25........ £1,615,000.00 15 Sep 10 23 Sep 10 £88.49

0.25........ £9,800,000.00 15 Sep 10 24 Sep 10 £604.11

0.25........ £2,898,000.00 16 Sep 10 27 Sep 10 £218.34

0.25........ £2,866,000.00 17 Sep 10 27 Sep 10 £196.30

0.25........ £3,892,000.00 20 Sep 10 1 Oct 10 £293.23

0.25........ £8,701,000.00 21 Sep 10 5 Oct 10 £834.34

0.25........ £4,960,000.00 22 Sep 10 7 Oct 10 £509.59

0.25........ £2,838,000.00 24 Sep 10 8 Oct 10 £272.14

0.25........ £622,000.00 27 Sep 10 13 Oct 10 £68.16

0.25........ £2,000,000.00 28 Sep 10 29 Sep 10 £13.70

0.25........ .£2,323,000.00 28 Sep 10 8 Oct 10 £159.11

0.25........ £3,500,000.00 30 Sep 10 11 Oct 10 £263.70

0.25........ £1,500,000.00 30 Sep 10 14 Oct 10 £143.84

0.25........ £2,600,000.00 30 Sep 10 18 Oct 10 £320.55

0.25........ £4,700,000.00 30 Sep 10 20 Oct 10 £643.84

0.25........ £3,200,000.00 30 Sep 10 21 Oct 10 £460.27

0.25........ £8,200,000.00 30 Sep 10 22 Oct 10 £1,235.62

0.25........ £6,500,000.00 30 Sep 10 25 Oct 10 £1,113.01

0.25........ £1,284,000.00 30 Sep 10 27 Oct 10 £237.45

0.25........ £6,536,000.00 1 Oct 10 27 Oct 10 £1,163.95

0.25........ £2,500,000.00 1 Oct 10 28 Oct 10 £462.33

0.25........ £1,500,000.00 1 Oct 10 29 Oct 10 £287.67

0.25........ £4,390,000.00 4 Oct 10 20 Oct 10 £481.10

0.25........ £1,512,000.00 7 Oct 10 1 Nov 10 £258.90

0.25........ £5,035,000.00 8 Oct 10 11 Oct 10 £103.46

0.25........ £1,000,000.00 11 Oct 10 12 Oct 10 £6.85

0.25........ £4,490,000.00 11 Oct 10 13 Oct 10 £61.51

0.25........ £725,000.00 12 Oct 10 22 Oct 10 £49.66

0.25........ £9,000,000.00 15 Oct 10 18 Oct 10 £184.93

0.25........ £1,805,000.00 15 Oct 10 18 Oct 10 £37.09

0.25........ £4,484,000.00 19 Oct 10 25 Oct 10 £184.27

0.25........ £4,500,000.00 19 Oct 10 27 Oct 10 £246.58

0.25........ £2,000,000.00 20 Oct 10 25 Oct 10 £68.49

0.25........ £2,088,000.00 20 Oct 10 1 Nov 10 £171.62

0.25........ £5,000,000.00 20 Oct 10 5 Nov 10 £547.95

0.25........ £1,775,000.00 22 Oct 10 25 Oct 10 £36.47

0.25........ £1,000,000.00 25 Oct 10 8 Nov 10 £95.89

0.25........ £1,000,000.00 25 Oct 10 9 Nov 10 £102.74

0.25........ £1,623,000.00 25 Oct 10 11 Nov 10 £188.98

0.25........ £4,000,000.00 25 Oct 10 26 Oct 10 £27.40

0.25........ £3,776,000.00 26 Oct 10 27 Oct 10 £25.86

0.25........ £5,231,000.00 27 Oct 10 28 Oct 10 £35.83

0.25........ £1,600,000.00 28 Oct 10 1 Nov 10 £43.84

0.25........ £1,000,000.00 28 Oct 10 2 Nov 10 £34.25

0.25........ £1,000,000.00 28 Oct 10 12 Nov 10 £102.74

0.25........ £4,188,000.00 28 Oct 10 16 Nov 10 £545.01

0.25........ £1,000,000.00 29 Oct 10 17 Nov 10 £130.14

0.25........ £3,707,000.00 29 Oct 10 18 Nov 10 £507.81

0.25........ £1,000,000.00 29 Oct 10 23 Nov 10 £171.23

0.25........ £4,000,000.00 1 Nov 10 2 Nov 10 £27.40

0.25........ £5,687,000.00 1 Nov 10 8 Nov 10 £272.66

0.25........ £5,226,000.00 2 Nov 10 5 Nov 10 £107.38

0.25........ £4,960,000.00 3 Nov 10 9 Nov 10 £203.84

0.25........ £3,270,000.00 4 Nov 10 18 Nov 10 £313.56

0.25........ £7,030,000.00 5 Nov 10 12 Nov 10 £337.05

0.25........ £7,249,000.00 8 Nov 10 16 Nov 10 £397.21

0.25........ £1,475,000.00 9 Nov 10 17 Nov 10 £80.82

0.25........ £1,055,000.00 10 Nov 10 22 Nov 10 £86.71

0.25........ £6,771,000.00 12 Nov 10 24 Nov 10 £556.52

0.25........ £2,000,000.00 15 Nov 10 23 Nov 10 £109.59

0.25........ £7,273,000.00 15 Nov 10 26 Nov 10 £547.97

0.25........ £2,440,000.00 16 Nov 10 25 Nov 10 £150.41

0.25........ £1,000,000.00 16 Nov 10 29 Nov 10 £89.04

0.25........ £2,000,000.00 16 Nov 10 2 Dec 10 £219.18

0.25........ £6,000,000.00 16 Nov 10 3 Dec 10 £698.63

0.25........ £2,754,000.00 17 Nov 10 24 Nov 10 £132.04

0.25........ £4,291,000.00 18 Nov 10 26 Nov 10 £235.12

0.25........ £1,586,000.00 23 Nov 10 2 Dec 10 £97.77

0.25........ £2,755,000.00 24 Nov 10 3 Dec 10 £169.83

0.25........ £802,000.00 25 Nov 10 6 Dec 10 £60.42

0.25........ £2,000,000.00 26 Nov 10 30 Nov 10 £54.79

0.25........ £1,500,000.00 26 Nov 10 7 Dec 10 £113.01

0.25........ £1,500,000.00 26 Nov 10 8 Dec 10 £123.29

0.25........ £1,500,000.00 26 Nov 10 9 Dec 10 £133.56

0.25........ £1,500,000.00 26 Nov 10 13 Dec 10 £174.66

0.25........ £1,339,000.00 26 Nov 10 14 Dec 10 £165.08

0.25........ £1,430,000.00 29 Nov 10 10 Dec 10 £107.74

0.25........ £1,973,000.00 30 Nov 10 14 Dec 10 £189.19

0.25........ £2,000,000.00 1 Dec 10 2 Dec 10 £13.70

0.25........ £5,000,000.00 1 Dec 10 16 Dec 10 £513.70

0.25........ £5,730,000.00 1 Dec 10 17 Dec 10 £627.95

0.25........ £2,965,000.00 2 Dec 10 13 Dec 10 £223.39

0.25........ £5,893,000.00 3 Dec 10 6 Dec 10 £121.09

0.25........ £3,472,000.00 6 Dec 10 7 Dec 10 £23.78

0.25........ £3,220,000.00 7 Dec 10 22 Dec 10 £330.82

0.25........ £1,828,000.00 8 Dec 10 20 Dec 10 £150.25

0.25........ £2,790,000.00 10 Dec 10 22 Dec 10 £229.32

0.25........ £1,756,000.00 13 Dec 10 22 Dec 10 £108.25

0.25........ £4,938,000.00 14 Dec 10 23 Dec 10 £304.40









£708,511,000.00

£48,137.54 .