Educating the masses.

  That is the target for nationalism, and it will take some time to achieve, but educating you in the ways of LibLabCon cheating is perhaps the best way to open eyes and minds to what is really happening today.

 Right, so you will have read me on numerous occasions blaming the politicians for all sorts of unacceptable behaviour, so I thought it might be time to provide you with conclusive proof of what I say, though this might involve you having to look up a couple of websites.

  Here's your starter for ten.

SCRUTINY OVERRIDE!

  This harmless sounding term is one of the most damaging of the EU's programmes currently running in this country. It refers to the fact that this programme is used by parliament to fast track unpopular EU laws and regulations through the House of Commons, without having to come before the MP's for scrutiny. Instead, it is muscled through without your representatives getting even a say on it!

    And it gets worse. This programme has also been used to pass laws and regulations through parliament when it is in recess!

 http://www.lindsayjenkins.com/

 This is who I contacted about Override when it first came to my attention, check out what she has to say.

  Now, I want you to consider the two most damaging policies the government has at the minute- that's our enforced membership of the EU, and unlimited and endless immigration- and think about how these two policies help us. Do they make for more stable communities, or do they unsettle communities that have existed for hundreds of years?

  How does stuffing this country full of third world immigrants- and without our consent!- make our communities stronger or more cohesive?

IT DOESN'T! that is the simple answer. If the only people in England were the English, and we were represneted by the colour blue, the entire map of England would be blue.

  Start cto introduce foreigners into the map, and colour them red, what you have is spots of red appearing in a sea of blue. Now give it a couple of years of insane immigration rules, and what used to be a united and solid blue map is fractured in hundreds of places with red shards that represent cultures and traditions directly at odds with our own.

  Here are a couple of the cheats that the establishment use to kid you into thinking things are better than they are.

  1)
       When accepting immigrants into this country, Labour used to list the applicants name as an immigrant, but not those of the family members! So the fathers name would go on the list as an immigrant, but the wife and children were not listed! This is why Labours figures on immigration are distrusted by everyone, and why no-one knows the true size of Britains immigrant population!

  2)
      The LibLabCon will tell you that, for instance, 300,000 immigrants have arrived in this country this year.
 RUBBISH!
      What has really happened is this. 500,000 immigrants have come into this country, but 200,000 Brits have upped sticks and left, so the establishment simply subtract the numbers leaving from the numbers coming in, and proclaim that to be the immigration figure for the year.
 BUT IT ISN'T!
 What it means is there are 300,000 extra people in the country, but 500,000 extra immigrants in the country!

contact us at; efpstoke@gmail.com

What we want for this city.

  England First Party are standing in the upcoming elections with the sole purpose of changing how the city council is currently mismanaged, from finances to education, through to parks and play areas, but there are key areas we must focus on, and the first two are clawing back control of the city council from the council officers to the elected councillors, and the allocation of council property throughout the city.

  City councillors need to have control because they are elected by the people to run the city, and you cannot run the city with someone else calling the shots, so the delegated powers that council officers use must be removed.

  The England First Party, Stoke-on-Trent, believe that solving the gross ineptitude of the councils allocations policy is vital to the success of the city. How many times have community groups and residents associations fought for funding to provide playgrounds and recreational areas for the young, only to have them wrecked by scum the second they are completed?
  And this is a very regular problem, so why not sort out problem tenants and fresh allocations with an eye to reducing trouble in a certain area?

  The city council have the right to do background checks on prospective tenants, so introduce regulations along the lines of;

 You will not be housed in a council property if,

 1) you have in the past 5 years received a conviction for drugs/drug dealing,
2) you have in the past 5 years received a conviction for violence,
 3) you have in the past 5 years received a conviction for anti-social behaviour.

 Straight away, this reduces the city councils responsibilities toward those that cannot behave in a civilised manner, and immediately means that the community will become a better place to live, especially if there is a rolling programme of evictions for nuisance tenants.

  I am sick to death of hearing about the human rights of the scum we have, the focus of the city council should be aimed primarily at the decent, law abiding residents, and it should be about providing them with the best quality of life available. That quality will not be achieved by housing the sort of dross this city is littered with, or by the way they are selected for housing. Houses should be allocated according to your connection to the city and the community of which you want to become a part.
  As long as you are law abiding, you should be head of the housing list for property if you have this kind of ancestral longevity, your connections to the city are strongest, you get to be housed first, instead of the pisspoor system that operates at the minute, where as long as you are foreign, or have no connection to the city at all, you will get whatever you want.

 I find it particularly galling to see asylum seekers and refugees getting whatever they want from the public purse and the city council, but our sons and daughters are refused places in the city, despite them being connected to the place through family history!

  These two policies are the first in a long line of required changes in order to bring back some semblance of common sense to the city council, and the strengthening of our communities by re-introducing the idea of family and tradition as the starting points of housing people within them.

    contact us at; efpstoke@gmail.com

 

The council's biggest problem is disunity.

  I've had a look at the past achievements of this city council, and the problems that lead to nothing happening back then was the fact that they were all Labour councillors, whereas the fractious nature of local politics today, means that there are too many factions.

  It's a fact that the city councillors have for decades, been a disappointment in their failure to guide the city back to economic success, having sat back and done nothing as the industries that were the lifesblood of this region were taken from us by the laissez faire politics of both the Tories and Labour, seeing our skills and jobs decimated by cheap imports. How can the industries of the first world countries like Britain compete with those of the likes of China, where labourers and workers are paid 50p and a bowl of rice a day?

  Our city councillors should have been pushing for a certain amount of protectionism from third world countries that rode roughshod over basic human rights, in order to protect their constituents from the unfair advantage these countries had, but instead of standing up for their voters, these bloody marxists forewent the rights of the British workers, preferring instead to replace them with third world immigrants.

  And apart from bits and bobs, a park here, getting the litter picked up there, what have the city councillors honestly achieved?

  The time has come to replace these same old faces that get in at every election and then achieve nothing of note, and this has to happen because the way the city council operates has to change as well. It is clear that the way they do things now simply isn't working, it's just wasting huge amounts of money, so we need to change the very fundamentals that the city council is built on.

   One of the perennial problems faced by the people of Stoke-on-Trent is the underhandedness of the Labour group within the city council, and if this city is to be turned into an economic success, then these old school, pocket lining communists have to go, so those of us with genuine affection for this city can implement the policies that will help it back to its feet.

  Over the next few weeks, we'll publish policy ideas on as many areas of council control as we can, and we'll show you that there is a better way to run this city, a more efficient and successful way that uses your money to its maximum benefit.

   Please pass this on to friends, family, or acquaintances, we don't have long but we need to get the message out that another round of Labour third raters will kill this city off for good. If you have any questions, or would like to hear our ideas on a particular council service, drop us a line at the following address.

  contact us at; efpstoke@gmail.com