Bloody council hypocrites!

  As a follow on to yesterdays blog about cuts being made by the city council in order to find £7 million of savings, I posted an article from the Sentinel that explained how the city council was removing talking books for the blind from library services, in order to save a paltry £13,600 per year.

   Take a look at the table below. This is from a freedom of information request by Councillor Mike Coleman, asking these corrupt council officers what was spent on the marxist programme of Common Purpose, and remember, this is paid for out of the public purse!




  They stop talking books for the blind to save £13,600, then waste just under £36,000 on undermining the bureaucracy that the city is supposed to run on!
Damn near three times what they save by punishing a small group of disabled people is eaten up by what they waste on this communist bullshit!
Common Purpose needs to be proscribed by the city council, its graduates banned from working for the city council in ANY capacity, and this should be the message put out by all local parties genuinely interested in democracy. The BNP in particular should ignore the ruling of their maniacal leader and unite with the rest of the city to fight this, no personal interests should come before the wellbeing of the city and its people.

  contact us at; efpstoke@gmail.com

Taking candy from babies, or books from the blind.

  How low can a group of council scumbags get?
In the hunt for the £7 million of savings required of them by the government, this city council will leave no stone unturned, except the one they're hiding under of course!
Childrens day centres closed, community halls disposed of, the mobile library history, and now, for the massive saving of £13,600 per year, talking books for the blind!

  Why are these thieving, lying, moneygrabbing tossers bringing harrassment to the lives of people who plainly have enough to contend with?
Why don't these masonic, Common Purpose sorts start making cuts and savings that will actually reduce the deficit?

  I'll tell you why, because to do so would mean hitting themselves in the pocket!

   Why should the blind go without talking books, but the city council still enjoy free parking, a perk which costs the taxpayers of this city £700,000! Now that would make a good saving!

  Why should the children have to lose out on the mobile library, but the city council still enjoy subsidised meals in their canteen, or spend hundreds of thousands of pounds tarting up their offices?

  Why should our communities do without community halls, but an evergrowing section of the council take £50k or more in salary?
And if they're not taking it for themselves, then they're giving it to their mates in the shape of cushy quango jobs.

   We absolutely must continue to bang away at this message to the electorate, and continue to highlight just how poor and corrupt the service is from these council deadbeats.
Only with a change of personnel will things get better, and the only chance you'll get for change in the next 5 years(!) will be the elections in May.

  contact us at;  efpstoke@gmail.com, or text to; 07955 142 653